Why is burial considered dubstep?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by chronicrecords » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:04 am

Is it because this is what early dubstep sounded like or something? Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now, and i do think most burial tunes are incredible, but cant see how they are labeled as dubstep. they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes. Does he want his tunes labeled dubstep? seems more like downtempo or some shit

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Post by seckle » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:12 am


User avatar
drokkr
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Post by drokkr » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:16 am

seckle wrote:answers are here...
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
good read that :wink:

User avatar
swiftguyver
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:41 pm

Post by swiftguyver » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:16 am

i think people connect his name with 'dubstep' because he is signed to Hyperdub which is one of the scene's biggest, most influential labels (even though most of the stuff they put out is left of centre and sometimes not really dubstep at all...)

it is also probably because his sound ties in with old 2 step garage/pirate radio vibes and because he is friendly with many of the big names in the 'dubstep' scene and collaborates with some of them...

i doubt he would want his music to be labelled as 'dubstep' or anything else for that matter...he is just doing his thing, Kode9 heard it, liked it and released it...
Corpsey wrote:Maybe if I murder my parents, Martyn will adopt me.
djake wrote:Youngsta is a machine sent back in time to mix like a badman...

setspeed
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:36 pm

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by setspeed » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:20 am

ChronicRecords wrote:Is it because this is what early dubstep sounded like or something? Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now, and i do think most burial tunes are incredible, but cant see how they are labeled as dubstep. they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes. Does he want his tunes labeled dubstep? seems more like downtempo or some shit
yeah basically at the time (of his first release) there wasn't really a better genre for it. South London Boroughs isn't as 'ambient' sounding as his later stuff, and there were fuck all tunes coming out at the time with any kind of rolling halfstep vibe. so it was almost by default, i suppose...

ST100
Posts: 8665
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by ST100 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:24 am

ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.
so all dubstep should sound the same?

:roll:

setspeed
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:36 pm

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by setspeed » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:27 am

mattron wrote:
ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.
so all dubstep should sound the same?

:roll:
oh give the lad a break...

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Post by Genevieve » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:28 am

It's easier to promote Burial records that way. 2-step has long left the media's limelight, while dubstep was just blowing up internationally around the time his first record came out. Might as well lump him in with the hippest, trendiest, hottest scene at the moment, no?

No hate, tho'. That's just the way the industry works and I'm glad a great producer like Burial has as much critical and commercial acclaim as he's gotten.
Image

namsayin

:'0

chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by chronicrecords » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:37 am

mattron wrote:
ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.
so all dubstep should sound the same?

:roll:
similar, thats generally how genres work :roll:

mumble
Posts: 621
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:32 pm

Post by mumble » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:54 am

Whats dubstep ?

chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Post by chronicrecords » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:56 am

Mumble wrote:Whats dubstep ?
what a clever new and original joke

User avatar
jikay
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:32 am
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Post by jikay » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:57 am

seckle wrote:answers are here...
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
Thanks for posting that, had two burial albums for a while but never really listened to them. Just been having a proper listen and it's some of the most inspirational stuff i've heard in ages and ages.

dj ill kid 505
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Albuquerque,NM, USA
Contact:

Post by dj ill kid 505 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:07 am

140 BPM + Bass Heavy.
http://www.twitter.com/djillkid
Follow me
Why don't you follow me
To a place
Where we can be free - Aly-Us

tkun
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:47 pm

Post by tkun » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:07 am

ChronicRecords wrote:
Mumble wrote:Whats dubstep ?
what a clever new and original joke
It's a valid question. What exactly is dubstep?

vactom
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:56 am

Post by vactom » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:10 am

I enjoy classic Burial. I love his ambient tunes. Unite, Near Dark, and Ghost Hardware are all wonderfully ambient and as equally dark.

chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Post by chronicrecords » Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:08 am

Tkun wrote:
ChronicRecords wrote:
Mumble wrote:Whats dubstep ?
what a clever new and original joke
It's a valid question. What exactly is dubstep?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep

there ya go mate

User avatar
ory
Posts: 1429
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:50 pm

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by ory » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:07 am

ChronicRecords wrote:Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now
then you shouldn't talk.

ST100
Posts: 8665
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by ST100 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:11 am

ChronicRecords wrote:
mattron wrote:
ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.
so all dubstep should sound the same?

:roll:
similar, thats generally how genres work :roll:
oh, really? so genre's sound all exactly the same?

:lol:


:roll:

User avatar
cosmic revenge
Posts: 711
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Bay Area
Contact:

Post by cosmic revenge » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:21 am

alot of his stuff is based around 2 step beats, which is one of dubstep's predecessors, so naturally alot of people into dubstep will be drawn to 2 step artists... why is this so confusing for people?

chronicrecords
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Location: England

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?

Post by chronicrecords » Tue Aug 11, 2009 5:39 am

Ory wrote:
ChronicRecords wrote:Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now
then you shouldn't talk.
ya who the fuck do i think i am trying to learn and become more knowledgeable about a topic that interests me.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests