Why is burial considered dubstep?
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Why is burial considered dubstep?
Is it because this is what early dubstep sounded like or something? Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now, and i do think most burial tunes are incredible, but cant see how they are labeled as dubstep. they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes. Does he want his tunes labeled dubstep? seems more like downtempo or some shit
answers are here...
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
good read thatseckle wrote:answers are here...
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/

- swiftguyver
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:41 pm
i think people connect his name with 'dubstep' because he is signed to Hyperdub which is one of the scene's biggest, most influential labels (even though most of the stuff they put out is left of centre and sometimes not really dubstep at all...)
it is also probably because his sound ties in with old 2 step garage/pirate radio vibes and because he is friendly with many of the big names in the 'dubstep' scene and collaborates with some of them...
i doubt he would want his music to be labelled as 'dubstep' or anything else for that matter...he is just doing his thing, Kode9 heard it, liked it and released it...
it is also probably because his sound ties in with old 2 step garage/pirate radio vibes and because he is friendly with many of the big names in the 'dubstep' scene and collaborates with some of them...
i doubt he would want his music to be labelled as 'dubstep' or anything else for that matter...he is just doing his thing, Kode9 heard it, liked it and released it...
Corpsey wrote:Maybe if I murder my parents, Martyn will adopt me.
djake wrote:Youngsta is a machine sent back in time to mix like a badman...
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
yeah basically at the time (of his first release) there wasn't really a better genre for it. South London Boroughs isn't as 'ambient' sounding as his later stuff, and there were fuck all tunes coming out at the time with any kind of rolling halfstep vibe. so it was almost by default, i suppose...ChronicRecords wrote:Is it because this is what early dubstep sounded like or something? Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now, and i do think most burial tunes are incredible, but cant see how they are labeled as dubstep. they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes. Does he want his tunes labeled dubstep? seems more like downtempo or some shit
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
so all dubstep should sound the same?ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.

Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
oh give the lad a break...mattron wrote:so all dubstep should sound the same?ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.
It's easier to promote Burial records that way. 2-step has long left the media's limelight, while dubstep was just blowing up internationally around the time his first record came out. Might as well lump him in with the hippest, trendiest, hottest scene at the moment, no?
No hate, tho'. That's just the way the industry works and I'm glad a great producer like Burial has as much critical and commercial acclaim as he's gotten.
No hate, tho'. That's just the way the industry works and I'm glad a great producer like Burial has as much critical and commercial acclaim as he's gotten.

namsayin
:'0
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
similar, thats generally how genres workmattron wrote:so all dubstep should sound the same?ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.

-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Thanks for posting that, had two burial albums for a while but never really listened to them. Just been having a proper listen and it's some of the most inspirational stuff i've heard in ages and ages.seckle wrote:answers are here...
http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/347/
-
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:46 pm
- Location: Albuquerque,NM, USA
- Contact:
140 BPM + Bass Heavy.
http://www.twitter.com/djillkid
Follow me
Why don't you follow me
To a place
Where we can be free - Aly-Us
Follow me
Why don't you follow me
To a place
Where we can be free - Aly-Us
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Tkun wrote:It's a valid question. What exactly is dubstep?ChronicRecords wrote:what a clever new and original jokeMumble wrote:Whats dubstep ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubstep
there ya go mate
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
then you shouldn't talk.ChronicRecords wrote:Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
oh, really? so genre's sound all exactly the same?ChronicRecords wrote:similar, thats generally how genres workmattron wrote:so all dubstep should sound the same?ChronicRecords wrote:they sound nothing like the majority of dubstep tunes.


- cosmic revenge
- Posts: 711
- Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Bay Area
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Re: Why is burial considered dubstep?
ya who the fuck do i think i am trying to learn and become more knowledgeable about a topic that interests me.Ory wrote:then you shouldn't talk.ChronicRecords wrote:Ive only been listening to dubstep for a few months now
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests