CAN FILTH BE A NEW GENRE NOW?

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:50 am

I am sick of it killing my dubstep.

djelements · Post by **djelements** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:51 am

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:51 am

DJelements wrote:

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:57 am

inb4 locked

inb4 "listen to something else"

inb4 "but i like it"

DRTY · Post by **DRTY** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:02 am

Every 'genre' has 'sub-genres' just something you gotta deal with

djelements · Post by **djelements** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:03 am

EDIT: Nothing.

djsupple · Post by **djsupple** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:20 am

Im all for sub genres as it gives variation, and attracts differnt listeners.
But PLZ No more new genres. New genres just break up big scenes into small seperate scenes.

Havnt we got enough genres at 140bpm already.

sines · Post by **sines** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:25 am

ST100 · Post by **ST100** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:36 am

Dubstep is dubstep.

no sub genres.

no bullshit.

chronicrecords · Post by **chronicrecords** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:42 am

haha funny yong made this like after the dubstep.fm live show (dented BBQ sessions), played like 10 richie august type tracks in a row :

was getting a little sick of that sound myself

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:55 am

djsupple wrote:Im all for sub genres as it gives variation, and attracts differnt listeners.
But PLZ No more new genres. New genres just break up big scenes into small seperate scenes.

Havnt we got enough genres at 140bpm already.

Genres and sub genres are the same thing basically. I don't see a difference, just different levels.

mattron wrote:Dubstep is dubstep.

no sub genres.

no bullshit.

I'd agree with you,

but dubstep isn't really dubstep anymore.

bandshell · Post by **bandshell** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:57 am

dammit Yong, play with your balls.

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:57 am

yong · Post by **yong** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:59 am

Sines wrote:

I know man, I know.

ahier · Post by **ahier** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:12 am

everyone knows house is better anyway so why worry

umryan · Post by **umryan** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:19 am

sub genres, get it

surface_tension · Post by **surface_tension** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:20 am

It's not a legitimate genre until Blackdown blogs about it. Even then, it's not as good as whatever he likes.

shaan · Post by **shaan** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:22 am

Surface_Tension wrote:It's not a legitimate genre until Blackdown blogs about it. Even then, it's not as good as whatever he likes.

MikeE · Post by **MikeE** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:26 am

BZPstep

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Sun Aug 30, 2009 2:41 am

mattron wrote:Dubstep is dubstep.

no sub genres.

no bullshit.

if only
so many subgenre offshoots now due to dnb producers coming in and garage/grime
we need some sub genres tbh

CAN FILTH BE A NEW GENRE NOW?

CAN FILTH BE A NEW GENRE NOW?

Who is online