Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
I'm looking into buying one of these and I'd like some professional thoughts about them.
How do they compare ?
How do they compare ?
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Fabfilter Pro Q FTW
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
-
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:05 am
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
professional thoughts? so you don't care about my views on the GUIs?daft tnuc wrote:I'm looking into buying one of these and I'd like some professional thoughts about them.
How do they compare ?
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Not tried Pro-Q (yet).
Also not tried GlissEQ v3, but it was quite literally THE general track eq (for corrections before UAD etc for tone) when I had time to make tunes. Great plugin, full stop. However I never ever liked it for mastering, jst didn't. Perhaps it was the material, but there was a run of things where it just didn't seem to work
I use PSP Neon HR when mastering now, excellent plugin, nice handling, and having the linear phase option is nice. I know Pro-Q has that too... but I just don't feel any particular need to move away from Neon tbh. Only thing is (deliberately) incorrect plugin delay reporting in HQ LP mode - in mastering that's not such a problem, but on a track that channel will be so far out of sync it's not even funny
Pro-Q is the newest one of the lot and has probably taken care of a lot of it... but I'm investing in a new analogue eq so I'm saving them pennies
In short - you can't really go wrong. In normal minimum phase non-oversampling mode they're all essentially the same thing anyway. So GUI matters!
Also not tried GlissEQ v3, but it was quite literally THE general track eq (for corrections before UAD etc for tone) when I had time to make tunes. Great plugin, full stop. However I never ever liked it for mastering, jst didn't. Perhaps it was the material, but there was a run of things where it just didn't seem to work

I use PSP Neon HR when mastering now, excellent plugin, nice handling, and having the linear phase option is nice. I know Pro-Q has that too... but I just don't feel any particular need to move away from Neon tbh. Only thing is (deliberately) incorrect plugin delay reporting in HQ LP mode - in mastering that's not such a problem, but on a track that channel will be so far out of sync it's not even funny

Pro-Q is the newest one of the lot and has probably taken care of a lot of it... but I'm investing in a new analogue eq so I'm saving them pennies

In short - you can't really go wrong. In normal minimum phase non-oversampling mode they're all essentially the same thing anyway. So GUI matters!
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
yea they are basically the same but Fabfilter is so damn SEXYYYYYY


Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
The price makes a difference as well, GlissEQ is half cheaper and it's discount time at Voxengo'shurlingdervish wrote:yea they are basically the same but Fabfilter is so damn SEXYYYYYY

Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Download the demo 

jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Yea still gotta do that indeed but I don't have time for proper try out atm... 

Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
would consider myself more as hobbyist but : 
The voxengo stuff is realy nice, sounds good, avarage gui and is a bit cheaper. Fabfilter has outstanding guis , great support and some of the best sounding native plugs that are around (pro-c is still by far the best Compressor for me + timeless and volcano of course ).
I dont own any PSP stuff, but tried the vintage warmer sometime ago and it was pretty good. From the specs it seems to have coloering options .The gui of neon looks a bit overburden if you ask me and it need a fucking iLok dingledongle, i think.
Hard descision: i would go with pro-Q if you allrdy own some other plugs and get a price reduction. Its a top of the notch eq with 24 bands. I could send you a 10% discount mail for pro-Q if you pm me, but i think its just for new costumers. Dont forget that you may have to add taxes to the prices. If you want spend less money go for the voxengo or wait till xmas there might be some deals.
heres a demo vid of the fabfilter one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9WdaU6HxzM

The voxengo stuff is realy nice, sounds good, avarage gui and is a bit cheaper. Fabfilter has outstanding guis , great support and some of the best sounding native plugs that are around (pro-c is still by far the best Compressor for me + timeless and volcano of course ).
I dont own any PSP stuff, but tried the vintage warmer sometime ago and it was pretty good. From the specs it seems to have coloering options .The gui of neon looks a bit overburden if you ask me and it need a fucking iLok dingledongle, i think.
Hard descision: i would go with pro-Q if you allrdy own some other plugs and get a price reduction. Its a top of the notch eq with 24 bands. I could send you a 10% discount mail for pro-Q if you pm me, but i think its just for new costumers. Dont forget that you may have to add taxes to the prices. If you want spend less money go for the voxengo or wait till xmas there might be some deals.
heres a demo vid of the fabfilter one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9WdaU6HxzM
Re: Voxengo GlissEQ vs Fabfilter Pro Q vs PSP Neon
Thanks for that and thanks for offering the 10% discount! Much appreciated!whet wrote:would consider myself more as hobbyist but :
The voxengo stuff is realy nice, sounds good, avarage gui and is a bit cheaper. Fabfilter has outstanding guis , great support and some of the best sounding native plugs that are around (pro-c is still by far the best Compressor for me + timeless and volcano of course ).
I dont own any PSP stuff, but tried the vintage warmer sometime ago and it was pretty good. From the specs it seems to have coloering options .The gui of neon looks a bit overburden if you ask me and it need a fucking iLok dingledongle, i think.
Hard descision: i would go with pro-Q if you allrdy own some other plugs and get a price reduction. Its a top of the notch eq with 24 bands. I could send you a 10% discount mail for pro-Q if you pm me, but i think its just for new costumers. Dont forget that you may have to add taxes to the prices. If you want spend less money go for the voxengo or wait till xmas there might be some deals.
heres a demo vid of the fabfilter one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9WdaU6HxzM
Still didn't try it yet but since they're about the same quality I'll certainly go for the cheaper.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests