But I didn't want to go too much offtopic, and also, I think this is an important question so that's why I'm starting a new thread about it.
In that thread, one guy says that he doesn't like Hijak. Judging from the responses this was not considered to be an OK thing to say openly. Everybody should obviously love all dubstep artists.
I think the tone in debates about dubstep is waaay to respectful towards the artists - can't you see that making it taboo to say that something is bad stifles the debate and lowers the intellectual level?
I've experienced the same thing when talking with reggae fans, and I've always felt that this is very frustrating and constricting. You can't be all about one love and positivity all of the time, that's very limiting!
If this was an indiepop/britpop/whatever forum and I would say "I fucking hate The Arctic Monkeys!" nobody would raise an eyebrow. I think that is the way it should be - although I realise that this was not an example of raising the intellectual level

Would I respect a book lover who said all books are great? No, I would say that he/she had no taste, or that he/she was too polite or scared of conflicts. No intellectual person should be scared of conflicts. To me, dubstep fans seems to be really smart people (blatant flattery
