RANE TTM 68 vs PIONEER DJM 800

[grubstep]

anyone used the 68? Is it worth the extra money?

[the dub lemon]

I've not used it but I would love to have one. I world imagine it is constructed and sounds far better and generally a little bit better quality than a pioneer but I can't promise that. The Rane faders are also stunning if you're into the turntablism side of things but if not it's probably neither here or there.

The things with the six-eight is that you're not just paying for a mixer, you're paying for the seemless serato integration and the ability to use 4 decks with serato, if you don't use and don't plan on using serato then this mixer would probably be a bit of a waste of money, if you do use serato then I doubt there's anything better.

[serox]

anyone used the 68? Is it worth the extra money?

Rane is 100x better than Pioneer.

Hands down, no questions asked.

[gwa]

TT68 if you want serato and 4 deck madness. otherwise I'd choose an A&H xone92 if you want the performance of a club mixer.

many people find this offensive but pioneer don't cut it for me when it comes to sound quality. although if you want FX then yeah djm800.

A&H 92 + pioneer efx machine would be what I'd go for.

[rawali]

if you want a 4 channel mixer, no effects plain and simple, ecler nuo 4 wins