david lynch on sept 11, 2001

parson · Post by **parson** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:05 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyVTkf8TnHc&eurl=

joseph-j · Post by **joseph-j** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:26 pm

The mans a don, but he thinks too far much.

capsule · Post by **capsule** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:24 pm

Its true, it was a set up...

1.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzF_BNRkRJs

2.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd1-Dp_-7WI

3.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5kF9ldtgrc

watch very closely at the 3rd vid and pause at 5.50 and 5.52 you can see little sparks right before it collapsed!

nirz · Post by **nirz** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:25 pm

Im not prone to believing in conspiracy theories but How The buildings went down does like a demolition ,,

capsule · Post by **capsule** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:29 pm

And then i didnt even started about Pentagon and Pennsylvania (right?).

There was no skitmark from the plane in front of the Pentagon! And in Pennsylvania there was no parts of a plane at all, just a whole in the ground. Its some weird shit that i dont trust. Ive seen a documentary about it but cant find it on the net. If i do i will post it immediatley!

parson · Post by **parson** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:34 pm

i think people who trust the governent enough to srsly doubt it was an inside job are the nutters

nirz · Post by **nirz** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:29 pm

they used the same tried and tested ploy to galvanise the American public Roosevelt did when he let Pearl Harbour happen, bring the horror home and people will stand behind a President who vowes to destroy the perpetraitor.

jim · Post by **jim** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:38 pm

I like the "it looks exactly like a demoltion" reasoning. Yeah, because you know what a skyscraper getting knocked down by a 747 looks like normally to compare it with?

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:47 am

its very hard to make a building fall like a demolition

it doesn't happen by accident

bob crunkhouse · Post by **bob crunkhouse** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:39 am

i was a bit skeptical until i saw "screw loose change" that put a lot of stuff in perspective for me, theres definately some weird stuff that does need to be explained, not denying that, but the way in which its presented in Loose change and a lot of the other stuff ive seen is so badly resourced and so badly put together, it just leaves me a bit confused

feel like im being lied to by everyone....

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:14 am

well lets just say for a minute that it was an inside job

lets suppose that this inside job went way higher than GWB

perhaps it was the Illuminati

george washington said no one was more aware of the illuminati's nefarious plans AND infilatration of american politics than he

so anyway if it was the illuminati, one of their most notorious strategies for population control is the fabian war of attrition. a large part of this war of attrition is setting up dummy parties representing the people, but they are incompetent and ineffectual. another thing they do is spread lies and disinformation disguised as as dissent in an attempt to discredit the real dissent.

the web of deceit and misinformation is a complex one.

it takes the ability to see the big picture for things to start making more sense

paolo · Post by **paolo** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:49 am

If there is a big conspiracy that's prepared to take down the world trade centre then wouldn't they go around killing the people who expose their evil deeds, eg the makers of loose change?

bob crunkhouse · Post by **bob crunkhouse** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:20 pm

Parson wrote:well lets just say for a minute that it was an inside job

lets suppose that this inside job went way higher than GWB

perhaps it was the Illuminati

george washington said no one was more aware of the illuminati's nefarious plans AND infilatration of american politics than he

so anyway if it was the illuminati, one of their most notorious strategies for population control is the fabian war of attrition. a large part of this war of attrition is setting up dummy parties representing the people, but they are incompetent and ineffectual. another thing they do is spread lies and disinformation disguised as as dissent in an attempt to discredit the real dissent.

the web of deceit and misinformation is a complex one.

it takes the ability to see the big picture for things to start making more sense

sorry mate, but that ain't convincing me in the slightest, i havent even heard anyone mention illimunati about 9/11..

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:22 pm

maybe you should dig deeper

parson · Post by **parson** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:23 pm

or not

most people prefer to believe that things are like they are told

capsule · Post by **capsule** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:02 pm

Also funny fact is that it happened on 9-11. Their emergency number 911...

And i just want to say that why people wont believe it was an inside job!
Employees that survived 911 have experienced strange things before that day. There were a group of 'technicians' inside the WTC 2 weeks before 911. They had to fix some problems (forgot what...) when there werent any problems. The employees of that specific floor find this really odd...
Now they suggest that these 'technicians' settled the explosives...

You may believe this or not, but i find this very interesting...

jim · Post by **jim** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:59 pm

If they wanted to fake blowing up the towers why didn't they just say terrorist blew it up with explosives (like they'd tried before) rather than flying some planes into it and then blowing it up?

bob crunkhouse · Post by **bob crunkhouse** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:07 pm

lighten up mr.Parson as u can see from my post i definatley admit there is some weird stuff going on, not denying that. and that im interested in finding out more, ive watched a few films on both sides of the argument and just kind of feel a bit lost!

seems that most of the stuff thats really striking and memorable evidence from Loose change was just bullshit, dunno if you have seen "screw loose change" but everything seems a lot better in terms of just presenting u facts, not opinions from people such as the "American free press" who along with a lot of other things are holocaust deniers! as well as believing and suporting most conspiracy theories going, that aint someone i really wanna trust.

seems like a lot of people are having there minds made up by 1 amatuer film, not saying youre part of that at all, but i see a lot of people my age jsut kind of agreeing it was an inside job because they watched loose change....its crazy!

bob crunkhouse · Post by **bob crunkhouse** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:08 pm

jim wrote:If they wanted to fake blowing up the towers why didn't they just say terrorist blew it up with explosives (like they'd tried before) rather than flying some planes into it and then blowing it up?

bob crunkhouse · Post by **bob crunkhouse** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:11 pm

Parson wrote:or not

most people prefer to believe that things are like they are told

sorry....but i really hate this elitist attitude that if u dont believe it was ain inside job, ure just a follower and cant gather your own opinions from the information u take in. its a bit paphetic really....

david lynch on sept 11, 2001

david lynch on sept 11, 2001

Who is online