deep dubstep vibes and parts here:
http://label.bassmusicblog.com/
the tunes:

ahaha shit, thanks for the link! i missed that one - really should spend more time on DSF! hahapompende wrote:are you joking?
http://www.dubstepforum.com/post2022881.html
not even a week ago braaaaaah.
But surely, that would make it a different song. Since, a different drum, bass, percussion means, a different song.lukki wrote:I have been chatting with my computer programmer brother off and on about something like this for a couple years, but my idea was more listener-based than DJ-based, as it revolved around a new file type that had alternate versions of each element of any given song.
IE: 4 drum tracks, 4 atmos tracks, 4 bass tracks, 4 perc tracks all encoded into 1 song
The media player would then randomly select which track of each element to play, giving you many different versions of the same song, or you could program in which version you liked best to hear it again.
Just a goofy lil idea that never got off the ground
I like the idea of selling stems with tunes for DJ's, great idea!!
i like it! write 4 tunes at the same tempo, in the same key. then pow - 256 possible different tracks.apmje wrote:But surely, that would make it a different song. Since, a different drum, bass, percussion means, a different song.lukki wrote:I have been chatting with my computer programmer brother off and on about something like this for a couple years, but my idea was more listener-based than DJ-based, as it revolved around a new file type that had alternate versions of each element of any given song.
IE: 4 drum tracks, 4 atmos tracks, 4 bass tracks, 4 perc tracks all encoded into 1 song
The media player would then randomly select which track of each element to play, giving you many different versions of the same song, or you could program in which version you liked best to hear it again.
Just a goofy lil idea that never got off the ground
I like the idea of selling stems with tunes for DJ's, great idea!!
I actually really like this idea!!!bassmusic wrote:i like it! write 4 tunes at the same tempo, in the same key. then pow - 256 possible different tracks.apmje wrote:i really like this as well!lukki wrote:I have been chatting with my computer programmer brother off and on about something like this for a couple years, but my idea was more listener-based than DJ-based, as it revolved around a new file type that had alternate versions of each element of any given song.
IE: 4 drum tracks, 4 atmos tracks, 4 bass tracks, 4 perc tracks all encoded into 1 song
The media player would then randomly select which track of each element to play, giving you many different versions of the same song, or you could program in which version you liked best to hear it again.
Just a goofy lil idea that never got off the ground
I like the idea of selling stems with tunes for DJ's, great idea!!
But surely, that would make it a different song. Since, a different drum, bass, percussion means, a different song.![]()
argh i used to have a link to a site that did thisdecree wrote:I actually really like this idea!!!bassmusic wrote:i like it! write 4 tunes at the same tempo, in the same key. then pow - 256 possible different tracks.apmje wrote:argh i used to have a link to a site that did thislukki wrote:I have been chatting with my computer programmer brother off and on about something like this for a couple years, but my idea was more listener-based than DJ-based, as it revolved around a new file type that had alternate versions of each element of any given song.
IE: 4 drum tracks, 4 atmos tracks, 4 bass tracks, 4 perc tracks all encoded into 1 song
The media player would then randomly select which track of each element to play, giving you many different versions of the same song, or you could program in which version you liked best to hear it again.
Just a goofy lil idea that never got off the ground
I like the idea of selling stems with tunes for DJ's, great idea!!
extlabs.com i think
i really like this as well!
But surely, that would make it a different song. Since, a different drum, bass, percussion means, a different song.![]()
I would love to start working with someone (or a coder) to make a platform and make this possible and accessible
P Daley wrote:Ended up at a party last night with a bunch of people I don't know and blacked out,
Woke up this morning with an email about ordering a $70 pair of UFO pants.
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
COUGH er, shushskimpi wrote:setspeed is ID right?
Soundcloudwub wrote:All the Dubstep sub genre names are joke. Dungeon. Purple. Bro. Sounds like bunch of retarded Teletubbies.
As per usual man's in form.. Just copped the tracks, but this is a nice idea..bassmusic wrote: COUGH er, shush
the more shitty remixes the better!triggy wrote:Yeah sounds like an alright idea, would prob get a load of shitty remixes but we can ignore them
love these tracks aswell
quality work
Very good point, i didnt think of it this way,bassmusic wrote:the more shitty remixes the better!triggy wrote:Yeah sounds like an alright idea, would prob get a load of shitty remixes but we can ignore them
love these tracks aswell
quality work![]()
well, the more good remixes the better really,but shitty ones will do; if 1000 bedroom producers all put remixes up on their soundcloud, and people start going "hey, where did you get those stems from?" - then it's all good from a promotion point of view
Soundcloudwub wrote:All the Dubstep sub genre names are joke. Dungeon. Purple. Bro. Sounds like bunch of retarded Teletubbies.
basically, 'don't sell it'.test recordings wrote:It's a good idea but what's the deal with releasing remixes for copyright purposes and royalties etc?
These stems are free to use for 'personal' use; put them in your DJ sets, live sets, remix the tracks, make mashups, put them on your soundcloud, offer them for free download, so long as it is non-commercial. You must credit the original track, and you can't sell the stuff you've made with them, unless you've sampled it so cunningly that we probably won't notice. (i.e. a snare drum here or a hihat there).
If you come up with something *really* good, feel free to send it to us: thebassmusicblog at gmail dot com. We can't promise we'll be releasing anything, but it'll be good to hear what people are doing!
The stems are, of course, not mastered; if you're trying to put them all together to recreate the original track we'd suggest throwing a limiter on the master output.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests