If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Akira
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:06 pm

If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Akira » Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:53 pm

Man i have just returned here after a long time away from the whole dubstep scene, i got dissillusioned with it before but now...jesus christ...
To lay it all out there, There are good producers, the likes of dmz hyperdub etc who make really good music that is more original than alot of songs in all genres out there. However dubstep has become dominated by songs that feature a bass done at a higher frequency so there is not much sub bass, for me that is what the genre and the whole scene is based on. Its what made going to Exodus/DMZ when i was 15 so special.

It seems that this is becoming less frequent and i suppose what has happened is that people have dismissed the power of the sub. which, for me at least is what dubstep and bass culture is all about. I have decided to just let it go really I mean there are no nights in leeds now for good dubstep...literally none.... and after london and bristol Id say leeds is the next home of dubstep so i dont quite understand why theres such a dearth.

But i suppose that is just the way these things go. Hopefully as the scene expands, be it through the over commercialisation or whatever it increases the chance that people will be turned onto the brilliant music by the likes of mala, loefah, burial, quest , silkie etccc. Because if it wasnt popular the chance that people would be turned onto those artists would be alot smaller. The biggest beef alot of people have I think is that on one hand although the growth and mainstream success of a genre is pretty much inevitable with anything that gets abit of populairty, my problem and alot of other peoples is that the type of sound that has got popular is actually quite hurtful to your eardrums. It has a harsh, whining shrill quality that lacks depth and subtlety. This combined with a what is now overused drum pattern(you know which one I mean) results in bad music that has a substance to it one would equate with pop. Only at least most pop tracks feature differnt types of bass, whereas with dubstep you just have an lfo'd wobble. If there was more variety to the wobble side of things id probably feel it more, the problem is many tracks sound very similiar. With the deeper sound though you have a lot more variety from artist to artist and i feel this creates a more interesting and overall listenable genre.

Brostep just hurts my ears. Like literally, its painful to listen to, im trying to be honest and not ott here but its rather ridiculous isnt it? That side of dubstep is just a one trick pony and is as sonically pleasing as an out of time gabba set.... Nuff Said

User avatar
beerz
Posts: 1188
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:46 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by beerz » Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:39 pm

soz for harshness......shouldnt give mates free range on my account lol :roll:
Last edited by beerz on Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lectric
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Lectric » Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:50 pm

tld;dr: OP say brostep is ghey
<keep it heavy>

Molzie
Posts: 7566
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:09 am
Location: CHCH, NZ

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Molzie » Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:11 pm

Lectric wrote:tld;dr: OP say brostep is ghey
lol

User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by tacospheros » Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:20 pm

dont worry about the retards yo, some of us can read. and agree with you


i also don't thin k threads like this should be locked. let the record show how people feel
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by garethom » Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:28 pm

tacospheros wrote:dont worry about the retards yo, some of us can read. and agree with you
:z: Why even bother to comment on it if you supposedly didn't read it.

Occasionally dip onto youtube for a laugh at some horrible bro-step, and my sub is doing nothing, may as well not be there.

horsefeather
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Brussels

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by horsefeather » Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:55 pm

Akira wrote:Brostep just hurts my ears. Like literally, its painful to listen to
:z:
It's about dropping a track at the wrong speed, and it sounding better than the real thing.

User avatar
Lectric
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Lectric » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:00 pm

GuY$ uR Ju$t J3al0u$ y0u C4nT b3 AS C00L A$ SkR1LL3XXX. Y0u Ju$t L1k3 b0r1Ng DrUM B3at$ W1tH L1ke st00pid b0r1nG $uB B4$$.

oh my god i cant do it anymore. i cant troll...

but yeh brostep is kinda really shite
<keep it heavy>

User avatar
sigbowls
Posts: 11188
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 7:31 am
Location: sigland

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by sigbowls » Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:08 pm

id switch out gabba and put punk
blazen the raisin

User avatar
InternetSlaveMaster
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Marengo, Illinois
Contact:

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by InternetSlaveMaster » Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:33 am

What? Reading on a text-based internet forum? How dare you!

But anyways, there is no point in complaining about this sort of matter. While I whole-heartedly agree with you, what's popular is popular whether we like it or not. Yes, it's sad a lot of artists aren't gaining the respect they deserve, but in the end, I believe good music will triumph because in 20 years artists like Skrillex will be seen as "Oh jeez, I can't believe I listened to that stuff", while Burial will still mean a lot to people. I think that's more of an accomplishment than anything. (No dis to Skrillex of course, but he seemed the obvious example in all of this.)

dro524
Posts: 277
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by dro524 » Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:33 am

For me, dubstep is music where the sub-bass frequencies take control of the song and are a driving force in it. For brostep, most of the song is led by noise, wobbles, etc, with the bass thrown on to give it more "oomph".

User avatar
Teknicyde
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:19 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Teknicyde » Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:42 am

I think its pretty common to take anything with midrange and say it has no sub, which outright isnt true and everyone in the thread knows it. Theres loads of tearout midrange with solid subs, just as much as there is without them.

OP, seems like moaning to me.

Stop using skrillex as an example. if your going to at least have to nuts to admit its his image your hating on... There are alot better, longer established bro producers then him...

Live with it. Bro is here to stay.

User avatar
InternetSlaveMaster
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: Marengo, Illinois
Contact:

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by InternetSlaveMaster » Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:15 am

Teknicyde wrote:Stop using skrillex as an example. if your going to at least have to nuts to admit its his image your hating on... There are alot better, longer established bro producers then him...
I assume you are referring to me? I like Skrillex, I didn't give a hint of negativity towards him. Was just using him as an example of a new producer everyone goes crazy over but then everyone forgets once the trend shifts. Didn't even really mention his music. No need to take things so personal.

User avatar
budsteq
Posts: 852
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:07 pm
Location: Dunedin, NZ

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by budsteq » Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:12 am

no it is not dubstep.

User avatar
Teknicyde
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 1:19 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Teknicyde » Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:13 am

InternetSlaveMaster wrote:
Teknicyde wrote:Stop using skrillex as an example. if your going to at least have to nuts to admit its his image your hating on... There are alot better, longer established bro producers then him...
I assume you are referring to me? I like Skrillex, I didn't give a hint of negativity towards him. Was just using him as an example of a new producer everyone goes crazy over but then everyone forgets once the trend shifts. Didn't even really mention his music. No need to take things so personal.
Not at you at all, its sad to hear you like him, and didnt take anything personally? Where on earth was there anything personal in my post? A bunch of sarcasm, if you read between the lines my post was saying 'Stop bitching on dubstepforum'....

User avatar
Mr Hyde
Posts: 2148
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:37 am
Location: SE26
Contact:

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Mr Hyde » Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:03 am

yeah, i'd agree- doesn't really seem like its actually dubstep if it doesn't even have sub. but this sort of anti-brostep talk has been done and done to death.

http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=172790
Last edited by Mr Hyde on Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
monkers
Posts: 282
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:37 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by monkers » Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:04 am

in my opinion
no
epochalypso wrote: Hardout, mix a whole set of coki 128kbs bangers on cdjs while using the guy the played before you's headies, and have wet tshirt competitions during the breakdowns.. and stage dive everytime you pull a reload.

can't go wrong.
Soundcloud
HTTP://WWW.SOUTHEASTSYNDICATE.COM

Akira
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:06 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Akira » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:30 pm

I dont get it tho, IDM is not that popular cos it sounds pretty out there, brostep is kinda takin shit to the extreme but people love it, IDM is alot more listenable to than brostep as well...I just dont understand how a genre that has sounds akin to a serious death metal band/bunch of powertools has become so popular when really its alot more extreme than say a lot of quests or pinch's or etc tracks.

User avatar
incnic
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 5841
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:28 am

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by incnic » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:32 pm

SOME RLY INTESRING PEOPLE IN HERE
brostep

Akira
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:06 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Akira » Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:59 pm

incnic wrote:SOME RLY INTESRING PEOPLE IN HERE

:a: Dont you go trollin on my posts!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests