Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

?
User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:54 am

After a brief experiment today, I realised that some tracks pressed to vinyl are cut 0.2 bpm slower than their digital versions. This is probably common regardless of music style, but I noticed it in house tracks with their straight 4/4 kick (hence posting in house). Odd thing is that it is almost precisely 0.2, and some tracks arent slowed at all.

I'm guessing it is something to do with the mastering/cutting process. Anyone know?

User avatar
dublerium
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: London UK

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by dublerium » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:56 am

Not your turntables, might not be perfectly pitched ?

User avatar
vertx
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 12:31 am
Location: ➫ ➬ ➩ ✈

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by vertx » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:14 am

I notice a slight tempo change when I rip my vinyl, could be the turntables though, some tracks more than others too

User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:16 am

dublerium wrote:Not your turntables, might not be perfectly pitched ?
i thought that might be the case at first, so i checked a few different releases that ive got on digital as well. some of them are exactly the same tempos (as expected), but some of the vinyl tracks are slowed by .2bpm as mentioned ...

webstarr
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by webstarr » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:34 am

you have too much time on your hands

User avatar
gwa
Posts: 14561
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:08 am
Location: LOW PASSING YER EAR DRUMZ.

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by gwa » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:21 pm

i reckon it's your turntable, i have my pitch altered so the bpm on the 0 is actually 1 bpm faster
Soundcloud

AUGUST 2012 MIX / DEEP / TECH / HOUSE
Follow me on Twitter
@malcolmzulu

These users Little Downed! this user:
Everyone

User avatar
incnic
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 5841
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by incnic » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:05 pm

hello mate if i were you i would:

1)rip your vinyl with a good turntable
2)warp it in abelton to the right tempo plus 0.2 bpm to get it back to normal (use repitch warp mode)
3)then bounce it out (WAV)
4)send it to your local vinyl cutter to be recut at the correct tempo
5)play it at home and marvel at the similiar bpm's
6)winrar

good luck with it
:w:
brostep

User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:57 pm

incnic wrote:hello mate if i were you i would:

1)rip your vinyl with a good turntable
2)warp it in abelton to the right tempo plus 0.2 bpm to get it back to normal (use repitch warp mode)
3)then bounce it out (WAV)
4)send it to your local vinyl cutter to be recut at the correct tempo
5)play it at home and marvel at the similiar bpm's
6)winrar

good luck with it
:w:
ha! i like this.

obviously not much of a bother really. just more of a curiosity. i do, in fact, have too much free time, so i ran through a bunch of other recent releases. i think the -.2 only occurs consistently on records that go through ST Holdings for distribution...

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by noam » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:25 pm

scrap that that was absolute bollocks

User avatar
LA_Boxers
Posts: 6411
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Croydon

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by LA_Boxers » Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:48 pm

Maybe some of the vinyls are slightly heavier? Try weighing the vinyl that is 0.2bpm and comparing it to the ones that are spot on.

............as you obvs have alot of spare time. lol.
Soundcloud - LPR006. Due 20/05/13.

http://www.rood.fm - EVERY OTHER THURSDAY 8-10pm //
http://www.corruptradio.net - EVERY OTHER SUNDAY 6-8pm//

User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:02 pm

LA_Boxers wrote:Maybe some of the vinyls are slightly heavier? Try weighing the vinyl that is 0.2bpm and comparing it to the ones that are spot on.

............as you obvs have alot of spare time. lol.
havent got a scale, but im not sure if it makes a difference for my setup. the technics 1200s were designed pretty well to stay locked at the right speed despite (small) variations of opposing force on the platter

i think it comes down with who cuts the master, and what speed the lathe is running at. also, although i noticed -0.2 bpm, it is most likely more correct to say -0.15%.

ive noticed that "Sam from Precise Mastering" is fairly spot on, while "Bean" (not sure who that is) cuts at that -0.15% (or whatever it is). also, ST holdings (with the block stamp info in the runout groove) stuff seems to do that same slowing business.

i feel like my OCD has been satisfied at this point

User avatar
rorz9992
Posts: 1251
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:43 pm

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by rorz9992 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:04 pm

baseband wrote:
LA_Boxers wrote: ive noticed that "Sam from Precise Mastering" is fairly spot on, while "Bean" (not sure who that is) cuts at that -0.15% (or whatever it is). also, ST holdings (with the block stamp info in the runout groove) stuff seems to do that same slowing business.
That's most likely Beau Thomas, hardcore/jungle producer back in the day and now a mastering extraordinaire.

The issue you have mentioned is most likely to do with the calibration of your turntables, although it's not really an issue because they are hardly out at all. Either that or you really do have too much time on your hands. lol

User avatar
HRKRT
Posts: 1466
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:59 am
Location: York/Reading
Contact:

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by HRKRT » Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:45 am

this thread gave me lulz
IABT RECORDS

http://www.facebook.com/iabthing
harkirit@breakzdjs.com
collige wrote:I would never try to use my production to get women in the first place


That's what DJing is for.

User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:41 pm

im still convinced of this phenomenon. 33rpm are spot on but 45 gets slowed the same amount. cant let this go

didi
Posts: 3788
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 7:52 pm
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ
Contact:

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by didi » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:31 pm

webstarr wrote:you have too much time on your hands
[+]
bennyfroobs wrote:cool it vip is one of the best funky tracks of all time, hands down
[+]
Agent 47 wrote:photek? who is photek

photek is my mate whos a house dj from london lol
[+]
wolf89 wrote:Me and my mates play a game where we remember the worst or most obscure nu metal bands we can and listen to them when drunk

User avatar
Raad
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:17 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by Raad » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:44 pm

I don't really understand what's bugging you.

This happens loads on a bunch of my records and I just use the FUCKING PITCH SLIDER

User avatar
baseband
Posts: 861
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: DC

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by baseband » Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:13 pm

trust me kompis, the use of a pitch slider doesnt bug me.

the thing that bugs me is that there might be a good reason for the consistent 0.15% slowdown on records that are cut at 45 but not at 33. but if there is a reason, i dont know it and cant find it documented.

User avatar
Func
Posts: 1406
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:02 pm

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by Func » Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:47 pm

If it bugs you that much email him beau.thomas@masterpiece.net
AxeD wrote:Kind of harsh guys. He got sentenced and he admits it was a huge mistake.

It's not like he dislikes Vivek or something.
TopManLurka wrote:inshallah your ears find their path in life m7.
m8son666 wrote:
OGLemon wrote:when did you become a father?
when i say son what i mean is cat

sully_harmitage
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by sully_harmitage » Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:58 pm

it's pretty simple, it just means the lathe used to cut those records is running slightly fast when running at 45. so when you play dead on 45 it runs slower...

User avatar
incnic
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 5841
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Some vinyl tracks cut 0.2 bpm slower?

Post by incnic » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:45 pm

i only play pure 140bpm dubstplates
139.80bpm is brpstep tempo
brostep

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests