No Porn In The UK

ChadDub · Post by **ChadDub** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:55 pm

I don't know what this means but I'm pretty sure it means you can't watch porn in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/ ... -providers

Suuuuuuuuuuucks.

Gewze · Post by **Gewze** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:14 pm

ChadDub wrote:I don't know what this means but I'm pretty sure it means you can't watch porn in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/ ... -providers

Suuuuuuuuuuucks.

''There will also be a website, Parentport, which parents can use to complain about television programmes, advertisements, products or services which they believe are inappropriate for children.''

stuff likes this really fucks me off. PUSSY NEVER HURT ANYONE FOR FUCK SAKE, stop being prudes and shut the fuck up

knell · Post by **knell** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:26 pm

Fascists! Leave poontang alone!

Oh well, from what I understand it means you just have to click a couple more times than usual to get your dose of slippery slant.

ThomasEll · Post by **ThomasEll** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:37 pm

Would have made more sense to have it as an Opt-Out, rather than an Opt-In

Sheff · Post by **Sheff** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:39 pm

Gewze wrote:
ChadDub wrote:I don't know what this means but I'm pretty sure it means you can't watch porn in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/ ... -providers

Suuuuuuuuuuucks.

''There will also be a website, Parentport, which parents can use to complain about television programmes, advertisements, products or services which they believe are inappropriate for children.''

stuff likes this really fucks me off. PUSSY NEVER HURT ANYONE FOR FUCK SAKE, stop being prudes and shut the fuck up

amen, i hate this country, everyone above 30 is a pussy and is scared of everything

BAN EVERYTHING

ThomasEll · Post by **ThomasEll** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:57 pm

Favourite comment so far:

First they came for the porn, and I did not speak out.

borrowed · Post by **borrowed** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:58 pm

People who want to watch pornography online

you mean every fucking one?

mylon · Post by **mylon** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:03 pm

thank god i dont live in the uk. that would be a very awkward conversation with my mom.
also

restrictions on aggressive advertising campaigns and certain types of images on billboards

JimmaJamJamie · Post by **JimmaJamJamie** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:22 pm

Saw this earlier, it's fucking stupid. Who are the ISP's and government to say what we are allowed to view on the internet. If it's not illegal then we should have the right to view it.

It's down to the parents to control what there child views, not the ISP.

TL_ wrote:Would have made more sense to have it as an Opt-Out, rather than an Opt-In

Exactly what i said to a mate.

wubstep · Post by **wubstep** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:26 pm

Tories in Christian-backed campaign shocker.

test_recordings · Post by **test_recordings** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:33 pm

mylon wrote:thank god i dont live in the uk. that would be a very awkward conversation with my mom.
also
restrictions on aggressive advertising campaigns and certain types of images on billboards

Yeah, asking to opt in would be embarassing but my dad would probably agree!

abelard · Post by **abelard** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:34 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/20 ... ilter-isps

what's actually happening is that you'll have to select between "parental controls" and "no parental controls" when signing up for a new contract which hardly anyone does.

not like you'll have to ask your parents to tick the box to give you porn

standard case of claiming big shit for headlines when you've done nothing

jameshk · Post by **jameshk** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:42 pm

wubstep wrote:Tories in Christian-backed campaign shocker.

noam · Post by **noam** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:44 pm

govt in money grabbing advertising bullshit shocker!!

oh.

emm.

gee.

Duffman · Post by **Duffman** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:55 pm

Cameron's such a wanke......oh wait

Duffman · Post by **Duffman** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:56 pm

The Guardian reported this wrong the diffs, the blocking system is actually opt-in rather than opt-out.

noam · Post by **noam** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:58 pm

forum poster in jumping to conclusion shocker.

oh

emm

gee....

Dub_freak · Post by **Dub_freak** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:00 pm

magma · Post by **magma** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:01 pm

*repeats comment from the Happy thread about the picture being of a one handed typist*

I imagine this probably won't work. Someone's had a bright idea and probably not thought it through terribly well, but whoever that was is a tnuc.

noam · Post by **noam** » Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:12 pm

genuinely dont care after half reading one post shocker

so THIS is why its great to be drunk when judging irrelevant, inconsequential bullshit...

amazing

No Porn In The UK

No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Re: No Porn In The UK

Who is online