
number 1 on beatport and look at that waveform...
anyone pointing out the problem i and you all should have get a cookie

From the looks of things I'd say that's where the sub bass is. (The bricked parts)wub wrote:If I'm reading that right, it's been brickwalled in some places but not in others
deadly habit wrote:this my friends is what a 10 quid master sounds and looks like heh
me mate trevor has dem reasons and only charges a tenner, has all the waves plugins and everythingwub wrote:deadly habit wrote:this my friends is what a 10 quid master sounds and looks like heh
How do you know it cost $10?
deadly habit wrote:me mate trevor has dem reasons and only charges a tenner, has all the waves plugins and everythingwub wrote:deadly habit wrote:this my friends is what a 10 quid master sounds and looks like heh
How do you know it cost $10?
Sonika wrote:hey can someone explain brickwall/brickwalling to me? is that basically when there's absolutely no headroom left and you've got the mix biting at 0.0 decibels the entire time?
sunny_b_uk wrote:the laughs i got was sitting there pressing playing quite a few times, realising after that its just an image
Because we pay for records, not distorted, over-limited shite. And because in this case, the looks really do explain the shiteness.joshisrad wrote:You realize it's because of the sub right? Look at the buildup when the sub drops out of the mix, that brickwalled shape is gone.
Why do you give a fuck what a waveform looks like? People love this shit, you could learn a thing or two from it. Don't act like you're above the loudness war. You're just a reluctant soldier.

The sub sounds fine to me. No reason to reduce the limiting. I think you're just mad because the track sounds huge and everyone loves it, and you can't do it like that.Basic A wrote:Because we pay for records, not distorted, over-limited shite. And because in this case, the looks really do explain the shiteness.joshisrad wrote:You realize it's because of the sub right? Look at the buildup when the sub drops out of the mix, that brickwalled shape is gone.
Why do you give a fuck what a waveform looks like? People love this shit, you could learn a thing or two from it. Don't act like you're above the loudness war. You're just a reluctant soldier.
And yeah... so the sub hit, and it pushed the limiter to hard... reduce the limiting.
You act like I made the thread, Im not remotely jealous, if I saw a tune on here that was brickwalled, Id laugh just the same.joshisrad wrote:The sub sounds fine to me. No reason to reduce the limiting. I think you're just mad because the track sounds huge and everyone loves it, and you can't do it like that.Basic A wrote:Because we pay for records, not distorted, over-limited shite. And because in this case, the looks really do explain the shiteness.joshisrad wrote:You realize it's because of the sub right? Look at the buildup when the sub drops out of the mix, that brickwalled shape is gone.
Why do you give a fuck what a waveform looks like? People love this shit, you could learn a thing or two from it. Don't act like you're above the loudness war. You're just a reluctant soldier.
And yeah... so the sub hit, and it pushed the limiter to hard... reduce the limiting.
Do you even know what audio sounds like when it's over-limited? Do you know what the proper term for that is? Do you actually know anything regarding DSP, mastering, the properties of sound, basically anything at all?
The track is not shitty. It's number one on beatport. Don't be jealous. Do your thing and stop worrying about what others are doing.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests