Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Hi guys, just to help finalise my thesis i've put together this really short questionnaire, literally only 5 questions. Would be a massive help if you could fill it out for me.
A bit of background info, my dissertation is about how successfully software can model hardware inside the modern recording studio. With the help of a mastering engineer we've recorded several different instruments and applied instances of hardware processing (compression etc), and also with the software version modelled on the hardware. I've done a blind A/B test with several people to see how the two stack up, and to note any differences if you are not told which is which first.
However part of my dissertation is on how people PERCEIVE software versions of hardware units to be, so you can take part in this questionnaire even if you do not own any hardware or any of the software modelled on hardware. This is more just to see if people still perceive software to be inferior etc.
http://kwiksurveys.com?u=Hardwaremodelling
Thanks to anyone who takes part in the questionnaire!
A bit of background info, my dissertation is about how successfully software can model hardware inside the modern recording studio. With the help of a mastering engineer we've recorded several different instruments and applied instances of hardware processing (compression etc), and also with the software version modelled on the hardware. I've done a blind A/B test with several people to see how the two stack up, and to note any differences if you are not told which is which first.
However part of my dissertation is on how people PERCEIVE software versions of hardware units to be, so you can take part in this questionnaire even if you do not own any hardware or any of the software modelled on hardware. This is more just to see if people still perceive software to be inferior etc.
http://kwiksurveys.com?u=Hardwaremodelling
Thanks to anyone who takes part in the questionnaire!
Tearing black holes into clinically spatial grooves.
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
How appropriate!PERCEPT wrote:part of my dissertation is on how people PERCEIVE
Filled it in
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
- Promise One
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:22 pm
- Location: London
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Easy man, so you've used real outboard and processed and compared the same audio to a version processed with the software equivalent? Can I ask what was the software, an official emulation like the UAD stuff, Waves or something else? Interested to know which plugs and hardware you used in this. Will do the questionnaire now.PERCEPT wrote:With the help of a mastering engineer we've recorded several different instruments and applied instances of hardware processing (compression etc), and also with the software version modelled on the hardware. I've done a blind A/B test with several people to see how the two stack up, and to note any differences if you are not told which is which first.
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Hardware wise, Lexicom PCM70 for reverb, and the SSL X-Rack for EQ, and then the Lexicom Native and the Waves SSL G-EQ.Promise One wrote:Easy man, so you've used real outboard and processed and compared the same audio to a version processed with the software equivalent? Can I ask what was the software, an official emulation like the UAD stuff, Waves or something else? Interested to know which plugs and hardware you used in this. Will do the questionnaire now.
Thanks for all the replies so far!
Tearing black holes into clinically spatial grooves.
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Hit is up with some lengthy replies in those tiny little boxes 
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Sorry about that, no idea how to make them bigger! Thanks for all the replies so far gents.nowaysj wrote:Hit is up with some lengthy replies in those tiny little boxes
Tearing black holes into clinically spatial grooves.
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
Re: Short questionnaire for my thesis: Hardware modelling
Just to clarify the 'same settings' that i mentioned, a few people picked up on that.
I didn't mean blindly setting everything to the same numerical value and going from there - more so that the overall sound coming out of both was as close as possible.
I didn't mean blindly setting everything to the same numerical value and going from there - more so that the overall sound coming out of both was as close as possible.
Tearing black holes into clinically spatial grooves.
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
http://www.soundcloud.com/percept
http://www.facebook.com/perceptdubstep
http://www.twitter.com/perceptUK
perceptmusicUK@aol.co.uk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
