Putting FX on Master Buss (A summary)

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
outbound
Posts: 1565
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: Nottingham

Putting FX on Master Buss (A summary)

Post by outbound » Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:30 pm

Seems that there have been a lot of threads posted atm regarding putting FX on the master buss, which ones should you put on, which should you not. Should you leave it blank etc etc. This post is going to hopefully sum things up a bit.

Firstly I'm not here to tell you what to do or what not to do. There are so many things you can do with audio and like most things there are no rules, all I (and others) can do is explain what results you can get by following a certain path, it's then down to yourself to decide what to do with that knowledge and how you want to use it. Finally it may be worth noting that I'm speaking of somebody who both masters other musicians tracks as well as producing my own.

Why put FX on the Master Buss?

- It can makes things sounds louder / more aggressive
- It can make things sound more cohesive (think ssl style compression)
- It can make things sound clearer / weightier
- It may give a unique sound (maybe reverb for a far-off / dreamlike style sound)

Why not put FX on the Master Buss?

- It makes it harder to tell exactly what's going on in the mix

When you have FX that are designed to saturate / distort the sound of the mix or 'glue' things together. It can make it much harder to hear exactly what is happening in the mix and because of that you may miss something. I guess the beer goggles example is fitting here. It's like if you're out on the pull, yes the alcohol is going to make the whole social interaction a lot more fun and easier but it's going to make it a damn sight harder to tell which girl to bring home ;-)

- It can steer the mixing process in an unnatural way

Okay so you have the drums and bass in the mix. Things are sounding good but a bit dull. Nevermind whack the high end up on the master buss and everything is balanced again right? Well yes but what happens when you bring in the next sound which is now too bright so you have to EQ that out, now the hats are too bright in the mix as well so those have got to be EQ'd to compensate. An initial problem which could have been fixed earlier in the chain (EQ'ing the drums and bass) has now escalated into a global issue of everything being too bright. It's better to fix these things earlier on to give you more flexibility.

- It makes things sound better than they actually are

It's great that putting saturation or similar on the master buss will make things sound edgier but it may take away from processing individual channels because of it. The reason this can be bad is that you are more likely to get a 'harder' sound if you build up the loudness from the word go. So get a kick that sound good mix it with a good sounding snare which you've processed. Maybe Get some processing on the drum buss as well so that by the time you even get to the master buss you have something sounding great. The master buss in this instance is just adding that final layer of 'goodness' :D

Final Thoughts

Just to sum up my thoughts on using master buss processing. If all is sounding loud, clear and coherent then using master processing is great for bringing another layer to a great mix. The more that can be done in the mix to improve the sound though the better. If you do want to add something on the master buss then fair enough no ones going to stop you but just stop and think for a second, 'is there anything I can do in the mix instead to improve the sound instead?'
Soundcloud
Online Mastering//FAQ//Studio
Evolution Mastering (Analogue/Digital) : 1st track Free sample + 50% off.
What Is Mastering?
http://www.facebook.com/outbounduk

User avatar
Khazm
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:31 am

Re: Putting FX on Master Buss (A summary)

Post by Khazm » Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:56 am

I don't put effects on the master bus until I'm at the stage where I've finished my track and need to give it a quick master. Normally it's just a multiband compressor and two EQs with a limiter, but I can't imagine using FX when making the track. I prefer to use an effect rack on a group of channels or single channels.

Dankstep
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: Putting FX on Master Buss (A summary)

Post by Dankstep » Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:14 am

Lol this reminds me of how in fl studio 9 (not sure if it's like this in the newest version, i seriously hope not) whenever you opened a new project it would automatically have a limiter on the master. I remember first starting out and not realizing this. Mixing was such a pain.

The only thing i ever use on master is a limiter after my tune is finished just to kinda normalize it, and occasionally slight compression. Usually though if i compress the individual tracks properly It's not even necessary.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests