Zebra (synth)
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:12 pm
Zebra (synth)
Seems to be loads of threads dealing with Massive, but not many on Zebra. I think it's an amazing synth, brilliantly and intuitively set out and uncluttered.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdW3Z-gm ... re=related - uhe's own tutorial are great, but demand a basic understanding of what you're doing beforehand tbh.
Anyone use Zebra/have any tips?
My main discovery so far is how good the comb filters are for making realistic string and horn sounds. Just brilliant; these filters make evenly spaced harmonics that I think it's difficult to get form a synth in any other way (unless you programme each individual harmonic, which btw you can also do in the spectroblend (?) mode in Zebra.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdW3Z-gm ... re=related - uhe's own tutorial are great, but demand a basic understanding of what you're doing beforehand tbh.
Anyone use Zebra/have any tips?
My main discovery so far is how good the comb filters are for making realistic string and horn sounds. Just brilliant; these filters make evenly spaced harmonics that I think it's difficult to get form a synth in any other way (unless you programme each individual harmonic, which btw you can also do in the spectroblend (?) mode in Zebra.
- OfficialDAPT
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 am
Re: Zebra (synth)
Just commented to say I highly recommend the zebra synth... It's great!
7 year old BROstep/Trapstep/Chillstep producer from India. Young. Talented. 7 Years Old. Super skilled for age. Signed to NOW22. Biography written in 3rd person on soundcloud OBVI. The next Skrillex. Wait I don't even like him anymore LOL. Super talented. Only 6 years old.
Re: Zebra (synth)
I've used Zebra couple of times and it sounded great 

Re: Zebra (synth)
would be my lonely island synth.
My Tip: Check out the FMO modules. Modulate the Oscillators waveform that is used as input to the FMO.

- BloomingAudioLife
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:29 pm
- Location: tacompton
Re: Zebra (synth)
downloading demo now. this looks really nice!
original track
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
Plastician wrote:what did the multivoice synth say to the lumberjack? TIMBRE
- PhotonOfficial
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:41 pm
- Location: Newcastle Wey Aye
- Contact:
Re: Zebra (synth)
You can make some sweet sounding progressive house-like chordal plucks in Zebra. It's pretty much my synth of choice when making that sort of stuff.
Re: Zebra (synth)
Dont forget zebrafy as an effect
There was a good video posted not long ago which had some good Zebra usage..
I quite like modulating the sync function.
Posted previous by someone and wub.
Also thought this from the User handbook was quite handy when I read up on it.
Resolution ((Found in the Osc Edit page at the bottom btw))
This parameter controls the interval (in time) between successive waveform calculations.
This trick ensures that Zebra2 is still very CPU-efficient compared with other synthesizers
that calculate their waveforms in realtime.
The range is from 4 seconds (at 1.00) to less than one millisecond (at 9.00). Theoretically,
high resolution leads to more precise transitions at the cost of higher CPU load.
Low resolution can actually make transitions smoother (intermediates are interpolated),
but can also introduce other unwanted effects (e.g. during rapid pitch-modulation). For
most purpose, the default value of 5.00 is best.

There was a good video posted not long ago which had some good Zebra usage..
I quite like modulating the sync function.
Posted previous by someone and wub.
Also thought this from the User handbook was quite handy when I read up on it.
Resolution ((Found in the Osc Edit page at the bottom btw))
This parameter controls the interval (in time) between successive waveform calculations.
This trick ensures that Zebra2 is still very CPU-efficient compared with other synthesizers
that calculate their waveforms in realtime.
The range is from 4 seconds (at 1.00) to less than one millisecond (at 9.00). Theoretically,
high resolution leads to more precise transitions at the cost of higher CPU load.
Low resolution can actually make transitions smoother (intermediates are interpolated),
but can also introduce other unwanted effects (e.g. during rapid pitch-modulation). For
most purpose, the default value of 5.00 is best.
hurlingdervish wrote:The true test of an overly specific, pretentious, genre name, is how many sycophants line up to defend its bullshit when the copy-cats arrive on the scene, imitating the styles of people who had no conscience for the styles they were innovating.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests