STUDIO - No MIX

tipz · Post by **tipz** » Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:08 pm

1Love

dopelabs · Post by **dopelabs** » Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:10 pm

goaway

tipz · Post by **tipz** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:59 am

xi · Post by xi » Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:43 pm

http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t ... sc&start=0

=\

Sub Shifter · Post by **Sub Shifter** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:56 pm

DopeLabs wrote:goaway

lol
AGREED

peace riddim and unity aint no Thugstep round ere
go change your nappy

AFL · Post by **AFL** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:17 pm

personally I think it looks interesting. I'm a fan of the hip hop so it could be aight. I'll dl and see tho.

kulture · Post by **kulture** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:26 pm

it's kinda like mixing the best music in the world with some of the worst music in the world... so it comes out distinctly average in my head. Good effort though.

ufo over easy · Post by **ufo over easy** » Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:18 pm

Luke Envoy asked you time and again to stop using his tunes without permission..

d-nile · Post by **d-nile** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:48 am

I haven't d/led these as I dont think I will like them but am I right in thinking these are mash ups?

Hmmm - I think it's a bit dodgy to put an accapella over a well known beat when dubstep is such a niche scene - fair play to people who do 'proper' pirate soul remakes and write their own fresh backing tracks - yam who, blackbeard etc... but surely if your gonna try to invent this 'thugstep' genre - you should at least manage to write your own dubstep backing tracks...

Don't think many of these producers will be happy with you using their beats and taking a joint writers credit on the title!

Maybe it's the US hip hop mixtape versions culture thing not translating well over the water?

south3rn · Post by **south3rn** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 1:24 am

not even mashups. just acapellas over dubstep tunes.

tipz · Post by **tipz** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:32 am

ok im sorry if i offened any1 by postin this up here,
the reason i put these together was to push a genre abit that id neva heard b4, i like the transition.
i can see u guys aint interested

marsyas · Post by **marsyas** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:46 pm

i wouldnt call it a genre.

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:23 pm

Marsyas wrote:i wouldnt call it a genre.

i would....

I think it would fall into the same catergory as "static" and "crying babies"....oh yeh sorry, genre called NOISE...

crazydave · Post by **crazydave** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:49 pm

Don't get people's beef at all (apart from the permission thing, obviously).

Live and let live, whatever your style is. I'm personally partial to a bit of crunk, so will check this out!

ufo over easy · Post by **ufo over easy** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:19 pm

tipz wrote:ok im sorry if i offened any1 by postin this up here,
the reason i put these together was to push a genre abit that id neva heard b4, i like the transition.
i can see u guys aint interested

The reason was there was a lot of drama on here - Nappy vs. pretty much everyone else on the forum in a massive 15 page argument.. wasn't pretty. I assumed you were him actually, posting under an alias. Nothing against you personally

khal · Post by **khal** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:31 pm

D-Nile wrote:I haven't d/led these as I dont think I will like them but am I right in thinking these are mash ups?

Hmmm - I think it's a bit dodgy to put an accapella over a well known beat when dubstep is such a niche scene - fair play to people who do 'proper' pirate soul remakes and write their own fresh backing tracks - yam who, blackbeard etc... but surely if your gonna try to invent this 'thugstep' genre - you should at least manage to write your own dubstep backing tracks...

Don't think many of these producers will be happy with you using their beats and taking a joint writers credit on the title!

Maybe it's the US hip hop mixtape versions culture thing not translating well over the water?

1) how is the idea of a mashup or blend something that's US and not translating, when the term "mashup" is international? and wouldn't providing an original back track, like the sick remixes XI does, not make these mashups? are you basically saying you don't like the idea of mashups?

2) no one is trying to invent a genre. when nappy did these remixes, he was doing what he's done with hiphop and other genres - he's just making blends.

it must be b/c dubstep is a "niche" genre, as you put it. everyone is so protective of the music... i just don't get it.

in any case, shouts to dj tipz for this one. big up dj cable as well. and, as per usual, big up dj nappy each and every.

sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.

ufo over easy · Post by **ufo over easy** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:33 pm

khal wrote: sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.

That has nothing to do with tipz, and everything to do with the way Nappy conducted himself on here first time round.

khal · Post by **khal** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:39 pm

UFO over easy wrote:
khal wrote: sry tipz, although i am in no way shocked that the forum regulars came at you like this.
That has nothing to do with tipz, and everything to do with the way Nappy conducted himself on here first time round.

you say he conducted himself one way, but i saw the progression for what it was, and yourself and the rest of the mods did what you had to do, i guess. no need to get into a round of us disagreeing with each other, esp on that point.

in any case, big up tipz. proper DJ.

ufo over easy · Post by **ufo over easy** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:43 pm

I'm not a mod

khal · Post by **khal** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:46 pm

UFO over easy wrote:I'm not a mod

weird. thought you were for some random reason. oh well.

STUDIO - No MIX

STUDIO - No MIX

Who is online