Quick Question About Limiting
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- AndreiStephen
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:37 pm
Quick Question About Limiting
Why do people prefer to leave plenty of headroom in their mixdown and then rely on a limiter in the mastering chain to induce loudness as opposed to mixing hot? Does it retain clarity AND make the track louder?
Re: Quick Question About Limiting
There's not really much difference in having your limiter threshold set to 0dB and mixing into it versus having 8dB of headroom and having to pull your threshold down that much. But conserving headroom is nice from a workflow perspective and keeps you from clipping plugins or any bounced out wavs. Think how weird it'd be to have your monitors turned way down but have all your tracks turned up 800dB and clipping wildly all over the place. It's just messy and prevents you from getting a nice view of what's going on in the mix. Much better to mix at the standard analog reference with your monitors turned up. Then you can send signal through plugins or out to hardware at the nominal level, set dynamics plugin thresholds intelligently instead of at arbitrary values, get accurate measurements from vu meters and spectrograms, etc.
Assuming you're not clipping any plugins, there's no real difference in terms of sound quality, but there are workflow benefits that might help you get a better mix.
Edit: I should also add a note about inter-sample peaks and how they can cause clipping even when a meter reads the signal as under. Best to leave yourself some headroom just in case, and also for the reasons outlined above.
Assuming you're not clipping any plugins, there's no real difference in terms of sound quality, but there are workflow benefits that might help you get a better mix.
Edit: I should also add a note about inter-sample peaks and how they can cause clipping even when a meter reads the signal as under. Best to leave yourself some headroom just in case, and also for the reasons outlined above.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests