Highpassing

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
fiziks
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: West Virginia

Highpassing

Post by fiziks » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:24 am

Okay. After reading the macc gain structure thread for the 100th time, I think it finally sunk in. I've got a few tunes that I'm going to give a fresh mixdown to. One thing I noticed is all the high pass filters I've got. Not like multiple filters per channel, but I've got one on the kick channel, one on the snare, on on the shakers, one on the synth, basically I've got one on everything except for the sub(individual channels, not final busses).

Generally, the filters aren't real drastic. More or less to tidy things up so there aren't any sneaky spikes. They filter usually sits just below or around where the majority of the synth, snare, whatever is hitting at. However, sometimes they are drastic filters. I've got a conga/bongo line on one track that I highpassed the shit out of for effect. But I suppose that's different because it's as an effect. I almost always, regardless of the kick or combo of 2 kicks, high pass some where between 60-80 or so. Again, depending on the kick and aim of the track. But, for your average tune, it's a given.

Basically, I'm just wondering if this is frowned upon or if I should be trying something different. Maybe use the linear phase eq a bit more? I do use it on occassion, but is generally just a few db's and the q is usually pretty wide.

I'm using Logic's built in high pass filter btw.

User avatar
yeager
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:48 am

Post by yeager » Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:48 am

i do the same thing bro, i got simplon on nearly every channel.
as far as i am concerned it is required procedure.

User avatar
mr ads
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:45 pm
Contact:

Post by mr ads » Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:43 am

aye, pretty much standard procedure as far as I’m concerned too.

I do the same, try and use EQ rather than filters where possible as they offer more control, however I still usually end up with high pass filers on half my channels / buses aswel for filter sweeps.

monotic
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:26 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by monotic » Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Yeah, I'd have to agree. I tend to use EQ but it comes to much the same thing. You can overdo it, though, and take out too much warmth and thickness. As with most things, it's a matter of judgement. Sounds like you're on the right lines, though.

User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Post by Sharmaji » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:29 pm

definitely not a problem, though do try backing off/bypassing 'em from time to time to see if it puts more body back in the track.

if you've got shakers or hats that have weird spikes under 400hz or so, it's a really good thing to do. ditto for pads that have weird bits of sub business going on-- don't be afraid to put them bitchez in their place.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

User avatar
fiziks
Posts: 289
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: West Virginia

Post by fiziks » Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:29 pm

Word.

Thanks for the replies :)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests