THE BOOTLEG BOYCOTT - VINYLS TO AVOID
THE BOOTLEG BOYCOTT - VINYLS TO AVOID
If anyone knows of any vinyl being distributed without the authors permission
please reply with a link.
I'll go first with the obvious new batch of "Skream - In for the kill" vinyl that Skream has quoted as "not legit".
WARNING: DO NOT PURCHASE ANYTHING THESE LINKS LEAD TO. THEY WILL BE OF POOR QUALITY AND WERE NOT CREATED WITH THE AUTHORS CONSENT.
(I realise there is another thread for the Skream bootlegs but they still needed to be mentioned.)
THIS THREAD IS TO BOYCOTT THESE RELEASES SO THEY WILL NO LONGER MAKE ANY MONEY
please reply with a link.
I'll go first with the obvious new batch of "Skream - In for the kill" vinyl that Skream has quoted as "not legit".
WARNING: DO NOT PURCHASE ANYTHING THESE LINKS LEAD TO. THEY WILL BE OF POOR QUALITY AND WERE NOT CREATED WITH THE AUTHORS CONSENT.
(I realise there is another thread for the Skream bootlegs but they still needed to be mentioned.)
THIS THREAD IS TO BOYCOTT THESE RELEASES SO THEY WILL NO LONGER MAKE ANY MONEY
Last edited by batman on Wed May 06, 2009 3:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
FIGHTING CRIME, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO.
- WhoAmI - NXT Records
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:10 pm
- Location: AKA whoami
I saw Smut's "Badman" was on Chemical as a shitty bootleg.
But they called it "Badnam Place." And made the other track "Smuck" as a kicker.
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ck=LMAO001
And they made it Unknown Artist. Bastards.
But they called it "Badnam Place." And made the other track "Smuck" as a kicker.
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ck=LMAO001
And they made it Unknown Artist. Bastards.
Last edited by WhoAmI - NXT Records on Mon May 04, 2009 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TRAX :: http://www.myspace.com/producerswithcomputers
SOUNDCLOUD :: http://www.soundcloud.com/NXT-whoami
SOUNDCLOUD :: http://www.soundcloud.com/NXT-whoami
- WhoAmI - NXT Records
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:10 pm
- Location: AKA whoami
There is another thread specifically about it and Skream himself says that it is not legit.
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=87225
http://dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=87225
TRAX :: http://www.myspace.com/producerswithcomputers
SOUNDCLOUD :: http://www.soundcloud.com/NXT-whoami
SOUNDCLOUD :: http://www.soundcloud.com/NXT-whoami
Are you sure this is Bootleg!?whoami wrote:I saw Smut's "Badman Place" was on Chemical as a shitty bootleg.
But they called it "Badnam Place." And made the other track "Smuck" as a kicker.
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ck=LMAO001
And they made it Unknown Artist. Bastards.
I know there was a release of this just last week and i got a copy from Redeye and it's all good.
Could just be a mistype, didn't think chemical did dodgy stuff.
Apollogies if you are correct.
LOCK IN:
http://www.renegaderadio.co.uk
every Wednesdays 8-10pm
Every now and again:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/steshinedub
Odds & ends:
http://www.soundcloud.com/ste-shine
http://www.renegaderadio.co.uk
every Wednesdays 8-10pm
Every now and again:
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/steshinedub
Odds & ends:
http://www.soundcloud.com/ste-shine
- mondays child
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:35 pm
- Location: south
- Contact:
I would be very careful about using the word illegal and linking it to a specific retailer, you could run the risk of having yer arse sued for defamation.
Sorry but it's just i know how the law works and this kind of legal minefield is a solicitors wet dream.
Not to mention getting the whole forum into a lot of hot water, i would please ask you to consider contacting a forum moderator before you go ahead on this, if they say it's fine no then problem.
Far better to suggest that bootleg copies are being sold unknowingly by a particular shop, least that way, if they were unaware the copies they had were suspect, it gives them a chance to do something about it.
Of course if they're knowingly selling the bootlegs, they may see the feedback and decide in the interests of good publicity to stop!
Cheers.
Sorry but it's just i know how the law works and this kind of legal minefield is a solicitors wet dream.
Not to mention getting the whole forum into a lot of hot water, i would please ask you to consider contacting a forum moderator before you go ahead on this, if they say it's fine no then problem.
Far better to suggest that bootleg copies are being sold unknowingly by a particular shop, least that way, if they were unaware the copies they had were suspect, it gives them a chance to do something about it.
Of course if they're knowingly selling the bootlegs, they may see the feedback and decide in the interests of good publicity to stop!
Cheers.
dont point fingers to shops please
go to the source (distributors)
and this whouldnt be the only time it whould have happened some big dnb labels back in day did the same with some bigggg tunes...
go to the source (distributors)
and this whouldnt be the only time it whould have happened some big dnb labels back in day did the same with some bigggg tunes...
SUBWAY MUSIC (Subway / Tube10 / SCUM)
Events / Music Group / Agency
http://www.subwaymusic.nl/
for bookings & demo's:
geoff@subwaymusic.nl
Events / Music Group / Agency
http://www.subwaymusic.nl/
for bookings & demo's:
geoff@subwaymusic.nl
Load Media did "Badman" without my permission and put some SHITE on the flip...they're trying to say it was some cock up with the wrong cd sent to master or some wank...I'm not going for it though, everytime I try and speak to the main geezer he's in a meeting but will call back...it's been a month now.
Heard they pressed up 500...please boycott it and just download it for free here (this is the most recent version...the one that was bootlegged is like 1.0!)
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... light=smut
ENJOY, so far approx 4000 downloads!!!!
Heard they pressed up 500...please boycott it and just download it for free here (this is the most recent version...the one that was bootlegged is like 1.0!)
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.p ... light=smut
ENJOY, so far approx 4000 downloads!!!!
is this legit?
http://www.htfr.com/more-info/MR298309
only on htfr, suspect
its the kromestar remix of erykah badu, on & on
http://www.htfr.com/more-info/MR298309
only on htfr, suspect
its the kromestar remix of erykah badu, on & on
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
- kingcannibal
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 3:28 pm
i hate to be picky, but its VINYL not VINYLS. Much like SHEEP.
http://www.ninjatune.net
http://www.myspace.com/KingCannibal
http://www.myspace.com/BewilderdBeatHedz
Archived mixes over at....... http://godsofwar.wordpress.com/
http://www.myspace.com/KingCannibal
http://www.myspace.com/BewilderdBeatHedz
Archived mixes over at....... http://godsofwar.wordpress.com/
Nicon wrote:dont point fingers to shops please
go to the source (distributors)
and this whouldnt be the only time it whould have happened some big dnb labels back in day did the same with some bigggg tunes...
exactly
http://www.bunzer0.com
http://soundcloud.com/bunzer0
https://www.facebook.com/FOBShow
http://www.mixcloud.com/BunZer0/
BOOKINGS : booking AT bunzer0 DOT com
http://soundcloud.com/bunzer0
https://www.facebook.com/FOBShow
http://www.mixcloud.com/BunZer0/
BOOKINGS : booking AT bunzer0 DOT com
I fully understand that this thread is about illegal pressings of vinyl, but from the shops point of view this can be compared to selling a whitelabel that rely heavily on a sampling of some classic tune... which I don't see many dsf users point their fingers at.
of course the people behind these pressings should stop this (or instead ask for permission to press up a small amount of a certain tune), but I hardly believe that it is the shops themselves that does kind of stuff.
and as long as it is 500 copies or so, sold for 5-6 quid (if they can sell them all), it is not big bucks that is made.
of course the people behind these pressings should stop this (or instead ask for permission to press up a small amount of a certain tune), but I hardly believe that it is the shops themselves that does kind of stuff.
and as long as it is 500 copies or so, sold for 5-6 quid (if they can sell them all), it is not big bucks that is made.
my latest dark UK garage mixtape:
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
Soundcloud
http://www.factmag.com/2013/01/23/downl ... l-b-mixes/
http://revealomaniac.blogspot.com
No this was in chemical the other day mate!hackman wrote:is this legit?
http://www.htfr.com/more-info/MR298309
only on htfr, suspect
its the kromestar remix of erykah badu, on & on
http://www.mixcloud.com/Etc/etc-no-6
- alex deadman
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:27 pm
- Location: Sheffield
- Contact:
[quote="Alex Deadman"]What about all the proucers who bootleg reggae vocalists and then make them into 'official' releases, is that still cool?[/quote]
you've got a good point i think.
the skream one is a bit more odd, so i'm guessing the remix was for a major, it was a big radio hit so the major would probably have made its money back that way, skream presumably got paid and the artist got alot of publicity thru her association with skream. The label gave the mp3 away so djs up and down the planet are playing it too, and it's a current record you can get it easily.
so everyones happy there no?
I imagine these bootleggers pressed up maybe 500 copies, probably make a couple of hundred off it, not bad a bit naughty but there you are, the major probably doesn't care, it hasn't bothered to fill that market with its own product.
But what about the jamaican guys whos tracks are sampled, accapellaed up, the unnamed singers who probably aren't even aware that someone is sampling or accapellaing their track to use on their own production, it kinda smacks of double standards and makes me question why those things are used in the first place, maybe it would be good to get some better practices of reference and possibly even payment on tracks that make money?
you've got a good point i think.
the skream one is a bit more odd, so i'm guessing the remix was for a major, it was a big radio hit so the major would probably have made its money back that way, skream presumably got paid and the artist got alot of publicity thru her association with skream. The label gave the mp3 away so djs up and down the planet are playing it too, and it's a current record you can get it easily.
so everyones happy there no?
I imagine these bootleggers pressed up maybe 500 copies, probably make a couple of hundred off it, not bad a bit naughty but there you are, the major probably doesn't care, it hasn't bothered to fill that market with its own product.
But what about the jamaican guys whos tracks are sampled, accapellaed up, the unnamed singers who probably aren't even aware that someone is sampling or accapellaing their track to use on their own production, it kinda smacks of double standards and makes me question why those things are used in the first place, maybe it would be good to get some better practices of reference and possibly even payment on tracks that make money?
First version of Cotti ft Doctor - Calm Down. Proper release on Bass Face.
Give me a jungle or garage beat and admit defeat.
http://www.soundcloud.com/rubadubs - Free tunes!
http://soundcloud.com/controlledproductionunit
http://soundcloud.com/thefamousgrouse
Latest tune: Soundcloud
http://www.soundcloud.com/rubadubs - Free tunes!
http://soundcloud.com/controlledproductionunit
http://soundcloud.com/thefamousgrouse
Latest tune: Soundcloud
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

