Page 6 of 10
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:54 pm
by hackman
of course it can be qualified you mong
go astral project
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:55 pm
by the acid never lies
Have you been to a Catholic church? DUHHHHHH!
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:10 pm
by lloydnoise
hackman wrote:of course it can be qualified you mong
go astral project
isn't astral projecting just imagining what you want to see?
"In the dark forest, one may experience a tree as a tiger, but it is still in fact only a tree."
Please answer my previous question hackman;
If those videos are not the best available proof of the reptilian theory, please point me toward more convincing material.
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:12 pm
by hackman
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:16 pm
by DRTY
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:34 pm
by lloydnoise
lloydnoise wrote:
Please answer my previous question hackman;
If those videos are not the best available proof of the reptilian theory, please point me toward more convincing material
God damn you are blind
Please answer my previous question hackman
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:39 pm
by hackman
google, i'm not going to make the effort of gathering evidence for someone who mocks my beliefs
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:42 pm
by HamCrescendo
Have you been to a Catholic church? DUHHHHHH!
Yeah the bread turns into christs body, scientists can't prove it but believers can.
You're a hateful person in these threads Hackman and it's a shame because you're funny and nice in others. Your superior attitude and dismissing of people who want their own appropriate level of empirical evidence before believing the far-fetched is quite unbecoming. You get incredibly defensive when faced with argument and paint all comments with a hint of incredulity as snide or trolling.
Do we have reptillian overlords? I
don't know, but I doubt it. Do you think you
know, or do you not know either but think it highly plausible?
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:44 pm
by hackman
hateful? i spose all you lot are all full of love with your stupid jokes and snide remarks
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:47 pm
by lloydnoise
hackman wrote:google, i'm not going to make the effort of gathering evidence for someone who mocks my beliefs
I have never 'mocked' you beliefs, I have simply asked for adequate proof when you make what I feel are outlandish claims IN A PUBLIC DISCUSSION FORUM
You and alien pimp come off as the angriest most defensive guys on this forum, it doesn't help when you are trying to turn people on to your way of thinking. At least Parson is damn funny
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:48 pm
by helix
hackman wrote:hateful? i spose all you lot are all full of love with your stupid jokes and snide remarks
I love you, Hackman.
Sometimes I don't agree with you, but I love you.

Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:52 pm
by HamCrescendo
I've never called you a mong.
I've never called you an idiot.
I've never called you blind.
You seem to do these things to alot of people who express doubt. Would you rather us challenge beliefs put forward or simply believe whatever you post?
I challenge your sources just as I challenge mainstream sources. I express incredulity at incredible statements.
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:52 pm
by the acid never lies
Guys it's very simple. You will find the answer in the Spirit of Jazz
http://www.astralproject.com/old/music/ ... nspace.mp3
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:54 pm
by hackman
Helix [Delay] wrote:hackman wrote:hateful? i spose all you lot are all full of love with your stupid jokes and snide remarks
I love you, Hackman.
Sometimes I don't agree with you, but I love you.


Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:55 pm
by hackman
danrev wrote:I've never called you a mong.
I've never called you an idiot.
I've never called you blind.
You seem to do these things to alot of people who express doubt. Would you rather us challenge beliefs put forward or simply believe whatever you post?
I challenge your sources just as I challenge mainstream sources. I express incredulity at incredible statements.
i've never called you blind or an idiot, i called you a mong which was probably uncalled for, but it's hardly that much of an offensive term
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:58 pm
by the acid never lies
hackman wrote:i called you a mong which was probably uncalled for, but it's hardly that much of an offensive term
Have you asked this guy what he thinks about that?
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:03 pm
by DRTY
are you calling HIM a mong?
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:06 pm
by hackman
who?
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:06 pm
by HamCrescendo
hackman wrote:danrev wrote:I've never called you a mong.
I've never called you an idiot.
I've never called you blind.
You seem to do these things to alot of people who express doubt. Would you rather us challenge beliefs put forward or simply believe whatever you post?
I challenge your sources just as I challenge mainstream sources. I express incredulity at incredible statements.
i've never called you blind or an idiot, i called you a mong which was probably uncalled for, but it's hardly that much of an offensive term
You've called me blind before. and misinformed. I find it offensive because I at least
try to be civil and you consistently resort to namecalling, your approach to argument is one of the main reasons I cant take it seriously. It's like anyone who has a devout belief, religious, atheist or conspiracy theorist.
I am not averse to conspiracy theories, I just approach them with as much wariness as I do a government source. That is part of being a responsible thinker.
Re: Major can of worms
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:08 pm
by hackman
well i'm sorry danrev
if you met me in real life, you'd find it funny all these names i sling out anyway
i'm not an aggressive person lol, it's easy to come across that way on here though
it's only text, with no emotion
i'm just passionate about what i believe in, as i'm sure you are to