Page 6 of 12

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:53 pm
by hackman
:( :( :( :( :( :( :(

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:55 pm
by parson
don't make me adblock that smiley

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:57 pm
by parson
:t:

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:58 pm
by hackman
i can't lucid dream, but i bet if you were really good at it, and went to an event in the past that you had no prior knowledge of, other than the name and date
and then when you woke up checked what you saw in the dream with what actually happened they would be near identical

anyone with super lucid skills want to try it out?

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:04 pm
by parson
i always wake myself up pretty shortly after becoming lucid

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:06 pm
by BLAHBLAHJAH
Should rename this thread "Time travLOL"

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:07 pm
by hackman
witty

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:10 pm
by parson
i just hypnotically suggested that with time travelology. see how it works

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:45 pm
by fractal
parson wrote:
fractal wrote:isn't string theory an antiquated notion?
no. m-theory has made it more relevant than ever.
not everyone agrees with this

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/1 ... at_atlarge

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:51 pm
by parson
if everybody is in agreement, somebody is not thinking.

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:10 pm
by fractal
well we're clearly all thinking then!


:w:


if i could time travel i'd bring back the gumby

Image

Re: time travel

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:14 pm
by WhosZena
I believe in time loops and gaps and stuff.
I could have sworn at times the same things are repeating over and over, like Deja vu.. I used to go through days getting them every 5 minutes or so. Nobody can proper explain what it really is, I see it as a kinda gap filler between you and a 'distant you'.
Maybe it could be possible to jump in that gap? who knows.

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:16 am
by noam
fractal wrote:
parson wrote:
fractal wrote:isn't string theory an antiquated notion?
no. m-theory has made it more relevant than ever.
not everyone agrees with this

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/1 ... at_atlarge
excellent article that mate, ive read a bit of Popper and didnt agree with it all but the thing that still stands out is that there may genuinely be a limit to human potential, this is something ive thought about a lot, the endless succession of zero's and the lack (thought not total) of greats with outstanding idea's only furthers the point that the human race isn't engendered to much beyond proliferation

also the fact that the scientific and philosophic community generally runs in factions/trends adds to my scepticism, the logical positivists to the relativists to the classical physicists, quantum theorists and string theorists

anyway, all interesting reading

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:28 am
by parson

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:29 am
by parson
the mystics know whats up. the scientists who have had mystical experiences know what is up. it's the scientists who have not had mystical experiences who are holding up the show.

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:39 am
by AllNightDayDream
I thought this was supposed to be about time travel? It has nothing to do with your guys' post-modern/nihilist/pseudo-mystic "Is it real, or do I just think it's real?" Argue for days man, but the answer is that it does not matter. This is a scientific debate, and if you don't think it's real, cool, but we didn't create the incredible machine you're staring at right now by looking at everything and asking "is this real?". The only thing limited by your perception is what time travel really is, more specifically, what function time has in time-travel.

Let's talk real.

First, look at the characteristics of time itself as we experience it. It is linear, and we travel in one direction always, regardless. Also, time as we perceive is relative. I'm sure it's common knowledge by now that the stars we see in the sky appear as they were thousands, millions of years ago, because light can't be everywhere at once and needs to catch up to longer distances. This means that a lot of the stars we see could very possibly be black holes now (Again, this is probably common knowledge, but JIC)

Time travel is completely possible, it's been proven in rockets with built-in atomic clocks, and just as the relativity theory states, the closer you get to the speed of light, the less light, and matter, is associated with whatever happens to be traveling. The faster you go, the less mass the speeding object has. This has all been established in Einstein's theory.

So imagine this rocket, speeding through space, trying to beat light and the very mass it's made of in a race. Now, imagine if SOMEHOW the rocket actually WAS speeding faster than light, and the rocket is leaving energy, mass, and light the light of its homeworld behind. You're covering INCREDIBLE distance!

Now, some simple math.
Speed of light = about 300,000 meters a second, which is 25,920,000,000 (about 26 billion) kilometers in 24 hours.
1 Light year = about 10 trillion kilometers.

Traveling at the speed of light, you can cover a light year in 385.8 earth days (almost a year, durr). The nearest star to our solar system at this moment, proxima centauri, is 4.2 light-years away.

Are you starting to get it?

Obviously this isn't some scientific theory, it's just some conclusions you can draw with basic facts. Theoretically, if you surpassed the speed of light, all the particles that are traveling can disperse due to the loss of mass and you will just turn into more particles floating in outer space. But imagine if we understood the science more and managed to keep ourselves intact. If you're like me, and think it's impossible to deny the existence of other species in the universe, then logically SOMEONE SOMEWHERE has done it.

I know it's a long post, but I'm on topic! tell me what you think. There's just so many ideas that you can stumble onto if you really think about the logistics of it.

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:42 am
by parson
we already covered that this has nothing to do with accelerating velocity to distort time. these guys are distorting gravity

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:44 am
by AllNightDayDream
It's been speculated with some decent science behind it that gravity distortion is exactly how UFO's achieve the speed they do. Everything's relative, man

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:53 am
by parson
yeah thats what ralph ring says

Re: time travel

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:54 am
by upstateface
Sorry to hijack the thread but could you please explain deja vu and why shit I see in dreams comes true etc. Mr. Parson?