Dubstepforum.com

yeh it only snips ya jizz-pipe

Mr Hyde wrote: there is no way it should be considered a method of population control!

it is a method of population control... you could look at lots of things as a method of population control, like disease. im not saying it should be used as a primary method of it but its IS a form of it. and denying it to people who wish to have it only increases population.

Just got a warning that I am intending to start trouble with this thread. Which I am not. I have a decent topic and remain civil. People come in and threaten me and my family and I am the one who gets the warning for abuse.

Well. I am out of this thread now. Last post.

I'd hazard the guess if there was no abortion the difference in birth rate would be negligible. Most kids are born in the third world where infant morality is high, and also the assumption that abortion is at such a level it would dramatically effect population levels if it were banned. For that to happen there would have to be abortions on an industrial scale, hundreds of millions of women every month, year upon year.... nah can't see that happening.

But to say abortion at it's current rate dramatically effects population levels, to such an extent, that it could ease global overpopulation is a total fantasy.

Besides which it's a straw argument logistically. And this argument is a shit one.

butt jolokia wrote:Just got a warning that I am intending to start trouble with this thread. Which I am not. I have a decent topic and remain civil. People come in and threaten me and my family and I am the one who gets the warning for abuse.

Well. I am out of this thread now. Last post.

Oh yeah, I used to get abusive PMs too. Kind of funny, wish I kept them though.

how is this still open?

lol, sheff inb4!!

THREAD GETS GHOSTED!

Sheff wrote:how is this still open?

Because I already had to lock four and it was getting tiresome. I'm half minded to merge them all into one glorious Political/Religion/Sarah Palin/Abortion clusterfuck of a thread and drop it back in here.

No, this is the last post.

Or maybe this is.


Who fucking knows

this is

This passage from Exodus seems to say that causing death to a fetus is not as serious a crime as causing death to a person:

"And if men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband may demand of him; and he shall pay as the judges decide. "But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, (NAS, Exodus 21:22-24)

this is

no this is

YES in b4lock

tnuc wobble

Religion. Why does it always have to go and ruin things.

titwank