Re: Yours, for $43.8m...
Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 4:26 pm
To noam's point -
1 - That isn't what the artist intended with the painting. How could he have? Therefore any artistic merit in that regard is nil.
2 - Trident is very expensive and causes people to think 'why do people pay for this??''. Is that art?
1 - That isn't what the artist intended with the painting. How could he have? Therefore any artistic merit in that regard is nil.
2 - Trident is very expensive and causes people to think 'why do people pay for this??''. Is that art?