Dubstepforum.com

reso wrote:I'm think i'll play an all spicegirl riddim set to mark their refomation.

reso wrote:I'm think i'll play an all spicegirl riddim set to mark their refomation.

reso wrote:I'm think i'll play an all spicegirl riddim set to mark their refomation.

roko wrote:hold tight all those hundreds peeps reading this thread, lurking, not saying anything! lurker kru MASSIVE!

tronman wrote:

dubluke wrote: ah no i never meant your party! nah any abacus ones i've been to have been great, it was that one in hackney and i have since realised like you say that its not a proper squat party...

we never said it was a squat party at all let alone a 'proper' one.
and that place is ok, but yes, the guy who runs it is an absolute cock who deserves a beating.

roll on this friday... i hope (going by the vague location description) thats it is in Bermondsey, there are some sick buildings around there.

dubluke wrote:

tronman wrote:

dubluke wrote: ah no i never meant your party! nah any abacus ones i've been to have been great, it was that one in hackney and i have since realised like you say that its not a proper squat party...

we never said it was a squat party at all let alone a 'proper' one.
and that place is ok, but yes, the guy who runs it is an absolute cock who deserves a beating.

roll on this friday... i hope (going by the vague location description) thats it is in Bermondsey, there are some sick buildings around there.

ok ok call it what you want there, but the main point is that the guy is a twat and gives a bad name to real squat parties

masstronaut wrote:

dubluke wrote:

tronman wrote:

dubluke wrote: ah no i never meant your party! nah any abacus ones i've been to have been great, it was that one in hackney and i have since realised like you say that its not a proper squat party...

we never said it was a squat party at all let alone a 'proper' one.
and that place is ok, but yes, the guy who runs it is an absolute cock who deserves a beating.

roll on this friday... i hope (going by the vague location description) thats it is in Bermondsey, there are some sick buildings around there.

ok ok call it what you want there, but the main point is that the guy is a twat and gives a bad name to real squat parties

It was an excellent party regardless, as was the first one. As I understand it there was a last minute change of venue and there was a message here about the booze situation. Not ideal but there was no deception involved.

heva wrote:

dubluke wrote: bruuuuuuuv this sounds SICK!! its bring your own booze yeah?? cos last one of this i thought it was but then they took my beers off me at the door and charged me inside! also how much is it again??

that wasn't our party. we would never have taken your booze off you, no squat party would have done that because squat party soundsystems are not in it to make money off the people who attend - in fact, thats the whole point of doing squat parties! escaping dickhead clubs who just want to make cash off the people who come to their establishments, and instead creating a space where people come together to make and enforce their own rules, and decide their own kind of fun. thats what makes them so exciting and different - i know people felt it at the last one, and this one is going to be even more of that! its addicting to feel like you get to make your own fun and no one who is looking to make money from you is making decisions about what kind of fun that is, based on how it eats into their profit. i hope this is reflected throughout the party - in the lineup we chose, the people we have involved and the venue we're using.

thats why we call it a free party - as in freedom! ...but not free cash, it does cost a fiver to cover costs, theres no other way to do it, these things take money so you all chip in and absolutely no one makes a profit.

you are probably talking about the lord napier venue in hackney wick - thats definitely NOT a squat. no offense to promoters who use that venue but we aren't a big fan of it... its just any guy making money for himself off promoting his club as a fake 'squat' using a squat chic aesthetic, and experiences like yours are the classic result.

however if you forget or elect not to bring booze, i'm sure *someone* at the party with a rather large, bar-sized stash would be willing to share theirs for reimbursement... wink wink...

tronman wrote:BUMP

TNT wrote:MAD SKANKS, BOTTLE OF BRANDY IN ONE HAND, ZOOT IN THE OTHER...

tronman wrote:

TNT wrote:MAD SKANKS, BOTTLE OF BRANDY IN ONE HAND, ZOOT IN THE OTHER...

im on them ones. involvin some other shit aswell prob!

its payday so i may treat myself to a little mandy