Dubstepforum.com

masstronaut wrote:

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:The only "conspiracy" that really makes me me wonder is Dr. David Kelly.

Real conspiracies abound, history is the pretty much the history of conspiracy. The truth of events is very often not known at the time they occur. It's not a matter of conjecture at all. Do some reading before you turn yourself into a boorish mouthpiece of the ignorant status quo. Oops, too late.

ive done loads of reading on the subject thanks, was pretty obsessed with it for a few weeks tbh. A story like the David Kelly one has credibility and some genuinly interesting evidence to support its theorys. I feel that after looking at some of the so called evidence for the aids conspiracy, 9/11 and aliens/humanoids, that its frankly laughable. So thats exactly what i do

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:

masstronaut wrote:

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:The only "conspiracy" that really makes me me wonder is Dr. David Kelly.

Real conspiracies abound, history is the pretty much the history of conspiracy. The truth of events is very often not known at the time they occur. It's not a matter of conjecture at all. Do some reading before you turn yourself into a boorish mouthpiece of the ignorant status quo. Oops, too late.

ive done loads of reading on the subject thanks, was pretty obsessed with it for a few weeks tbh. A story like the David Kelly one has credibility and some genuinly interesting evidence to support its theorys. I feel that after looking at some of the so called evidence for the aids conspiracy, 9/11 and aliens/humanoids, that its frankly laughable. So thats exactly what i do

Ha ha. A couple of weeks versus people doing lifetime research? But the thing is I'm not talking about conspiracies that are still generally unacknowledged, I'm talking about ones that are well known and on record. Saying that there is no such thing as conspiracy is just inaccurate. Of course you can find some things that you find unbelievable, and those things may be incorrect, but you'd have to go much further to disprove everything that is being suggested.

You have to ask yourself what it is that compels you to laugh at and insult the people who are trying to discover the truth rather than engage them in conversation.

my LIST is of people i do not LIKE

i do not like you stanton

i sent you an email saying to keep my name out of your goddamn mouth.

i didn't send you shit saying you were on a LIST because you don't believe in what i believe.

i do not like you because you're an asshole.

i've done loads of reading on islam and have chosen not to believe in it.

i don't go into the faces of muslims however and aggressively mock them.

Top Ten Real Conspiracies

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread83236/pg1

I love it when threads like this pop up in the hideout, cos, while skeptical i am genuinely interested in people's beliefs about these things. Talking to Parson is usually interesting, cos he is obviously not a nut job, but also believes things most would consider weird, so it's good to hear from someone willing to argue these things in a more logical way than most.

Although when you say you "know" about aliens and stuff, how is that possible?

I'd agree about democracy being a sham, but soley for the reason that ticking a box on a sheet of paper once every seven years and deciding which group of politically and visually indistinguishable middle aged men in suits makes all the decisions has fuck all to do with people power.

As for the masons, a friend of mine's dad is one and he is a boring bastard, so if the world does turn out to be run by them i am not going to lose a lot of sleep.

And there was definitely something wrong with Dr Kelly's death, that I am fairly sure of, but would quite like to see that debunking video if possible

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:A story like the David Kelly one has credibility and some genuinly interesting evidence to support its theorys.

You could say that in a case like this the whole point of killing this man was to send a message to others who might be thinking about saying stuff they're not supposed to. So of course it's made apparent what has happened to him. Just saying.

it is possible because i know. because it is true.

Parson wrote:i've done loads of reading on islam and have chosen not to believe in it.

i don't go into the faces of muslims however and aggressively mock them.

i also don't stand by people who aggressively mock muslims either and nod my head saying they've got point

masstronaut wrote: It's funny how Robert Anton Wilson and Robert Shea wrote Illuminatus! ostensibly lampooning 'conspiracy nuts' by taking the whole thing to what they thought was ludicrous extremes. Later RAW had to admit that a lot of it seemed to be becoming very plausible to him.

Various medical authorities swarm in and out of here predicting I have between two days and two months to live. I think they are guessing. I remain cheerful and unimpressed. I look forward without dogmatic optimism but without dread. I love you all and I deeply implore you to keep the lasagna flying.

Please pardon my levity, I don't see how to take death seriously. It seems absurd.

RAW

Parson wrote:it is possible because i know. because it is true.

Come on man, you can do better than that. I've asked you things about your beliefs before and like i say, i've been impressed by you not using arguments like that.

What i meant was, "know" requires some kind of absolute hard evidence, which i wanna see. Not so i can mock it, but because i want to be able to make my own mind up about it.

Parson wrote: i like you stanton

i like you're asshole.

No one is aggressively mocking you mate. They just wish you could spell 'your' properly within a given context.

Seriously though, when I wrote at the beginning of this thread that someone should show you that video I meant it. Most people who believe this kind of stuff are nut jobs and can't structure a basic argument to save their lives, you seem to be a reasonably intelligent fellow and it's interesting to hear someone talk about such things with a degree of rationality. I haven't called you names or rubbished your ideas without some sort of reasoned argument so I really don't understand or appreciate your animosity towards me.

Slim wrote:

Parson wrote:it is possible because i know. because it is true.

Come on man, you can do better than that. I've asked you things about your beliefs before and like i say, i've been impressed by you not using arguments like that.

What i meant was, "know" requires some kind of absolute hard evidence, which i wanna see. Not so i can mock it, but because i want to be able to make my own mind up about it.

i can do better than that but not in internet posts swarmed with assholes calling me names. if you want to talk you can come over here and we'll talk.

Parson wrote:i do not like you because you're an asshole.

this is perfect use of you're you nitwit.

Slim wrote:I love it when threads like this pop up in the hideout, cos, while skeptical i am genuinely interested in people's beliefs about these things. Talking to Parson is usually interesting, cos he is obviously not a nut job, but also believes things most would consider weird, so it's good to hear from someone willing to argue these things in a more logical way than most.

Although when you say you "know" about aliens and stuff, how is that possible?

I'd agree about democracy being a sham, but soley for the reason that ticking a box on a sheet of paper once every seven years and deciding which group of politically and visually indistinguishable middle aged men in suits makes all the decisions has fuck all to do with people power.

As for the masons, a friend of mine's dad is one and he is a boring bastard, so if the world does turn out to be run by them i am not going to lose a lot of sleep.

And there was definitely something wrong with Dr Kelly's death, that I am fairly sure of, but would quite like to see that debunking video if possible

there ya go - http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... 3411489909

leaves you a bit cold really, dunno what to think

Parson wrote:

Parson wrote:i do not like you because you're an asshole.

this is perfect use of you're you nitwit.

Yes I know, I was trying to introduce some levity into this thread by removing words from a previous post of yours so it became a comment about your appreciation of my beautiful exit and then lightly mocked the fact that in this new context the correct spelling would have been 'your' rather than 'you're'.

Parson wrote:

Parson wrote:i do not like you because you're an asshole.

this is perfect use of you're you nitwit.

Excellent use of nitwit though. Not used enough these days in my opinion, good show.

i realize this and decided to ignore your attempt at levity and reinforce my assertion that you're retarded

Yeah, people need to take this thread less seriously. Allow the hate and learn from each other's beliefs. And possibly tell me to fuck off, cos that did sound far too hippie-like

Slim wrote:Yeah, people need to take this thread less seriously. Allow the hate and learn from each other's beliefs. And possibly tell me to fuck off, cos that did sound far too hippie-like

Take the brown acid, really go on, it's cool