Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:09 pm
i remember when i used to go to sleep worrying about nuclear bombs when i was about 10 years old.
thanks ronald reagan.

thanks ronald reagan.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
sapphic_beats wrote:action is what makes change happen. so then the obvious question at that point is: how can we make change happen?
sapphic_beats wrote: elections are only one way to affect things
dont forget to thank charelton heston and "The Day After"showguns wrote:i remember when i used to go to sleep worrying about nuclear bombs when i was about 10 years old.
thanks ronald reagan.
It's potentially far worse now I think, even though it's not in the headlines as much. Seemed in the 80's it was another nuclear test every month or so and that it was all paving the way to eventual conflict.CursedC wrote:I would still worry if I were you.
read it again. i said they are "only one way", NOT "the only way".Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote: elections are only one way to affect things
NOPE, though as an activist I don't think you really mean this. Right now spreading important information, such as information about 9/11 or Obama or Rex 84 or the Military Commissions act has a serious affect! Many people in the world are living with very limited picture of the subjects being discussed in this thread. Right now getting the word out is a key means of slowing down the criminal agenda's going on with our governments. We must not get stuck in simply discussing one candidate versus another, voting, and then assuming we are making change and supporting democracy. We need to stay active in spreading information if we are gonna do anything to save the little democracy we have left.


i'm pretty ok with things if it were to end for me today. not quite as frightening as being a 10 year old.CursedC wrote:I would still worry if I were you.
Shonky wrote:It's potentially far worse now I think, even though it's not in the headlines as much. Seemed in the 80's it was another nuclear test every month or so and that it was all paving the way to eventual conflict.CursedC wrote:I would still worry if I were you.
read it again. i said they are "only one way", NOT "the only way".sapphic_beats wrote:Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote: elections are only one way to affect things
NOPE, though as an activist I don't think you really mean this. Right now spreading important information, such as information about 9/11 or Obama or Rex 84 or the Military Commissions act has a serious affect! Many people in the world are living with very limited picture of the subjects being discussed in this thread. Right now getting the word out is a key means of slowing down the criminal agenda's going on with our governments. We must not get stuck in simply discussing one candidate versus another, voting, and then assuming we are making change and supporting democracy. We need to stay active in spreading information if we are gonna do anything to save the little democracy we have left.
LOL. that's "sis".Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote:read it again. i said they are "only one way", NOT "the only way".Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote: elections are only one way to affect things
NOPE, though as an activist I don't think you really mean this. Right now spreading important information, such as information about 9/11 or Obama or Rex 84 or the Military Commissions act has a serious affect! Many people in the world are living with very limited picture of the subjects being discussed in this thread. Right now getting the word out is a key means of slowing down the criminal agenda's going on with our governments. We must not get stuck in simply discussing one candidate versus another, voting, and then assuming we are making change and supporting democracy. We need to stay active in spreading information if we are gonna do anything to save the little democracy we have left.i think you just misread me.
doh! right you are sir..
wow, how presumptuous and sexist of me...sorry for the second time....sapphic_beats wrote:Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote:read it again. i said they are "only one way", NOT "the only way".Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote: elections are only one way to affect things
NOPE, though as an activist I don't think you really mean this. Right now spreading important information, such as information about 9/11 or Obama or Rex 84 or the Military Commissions act has a serious affect! Many people in the world are living with very limited picture of the subjects being discussed in this thread. Right now getting the word out is a key means of slowing down the criminal agenda's going on with our governments. We must not get stuck in simply discussing one candidate versus another, voting, and then assuming we are making change and supporting democracy. We need to stay active in spreading information if we are gonna do anything to save the little democracy we have left.i think you just misread me.
doh! right you are sir..
LOL. that's "sis".
no worries...i only mentioned it to be cheeky and correct you a second time because i was feeling silly.Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote:wow, how presumptuous and sexist of me...sorry for the second time....Dubsworth wrote:sapphic_beats wrote:read it again. i said they are "only one way", NOT "the only way".Dubsworth wrote:
NOPE, though as an activist I don't think you really mean this. Right now spreading important information, such as information about 9/11 or Obama or Rex 84 or the Military Commissions act has a serious affect! Many people in the world are living with very limited picture of the subjects being discussed in this thread. Right now getting the word out is a key means of slowing down the criminal agenda's going on with our governments. We must not get stuck in simply discussing one candidate versus another, voting, and then assuming we are making change and supporting democracy. We need to stay active in spreading information if we are gonna do anything to save the little democracy we have left.i think you just misread me.
doh! right you are sir..
LOL. that's "sis".
it literally is an assault on the collective consciousness. i am sickened by how few are sickened by it.relaks wrote:I'm in America now, for the first time in months.
I have to say I am flat-out fucking SHOCKED with how plastered the media is with this bullshit nomination. It is so incredibly dramatized, people just can't think/talk about anything else. America is in an election stupor, it's narcotic.
I had no idea it was at such a "1984" level of distraction.
While i said earlier I would much rather have Obama than Hillary it doesn't mean he doesn't stink of shit. The whole thing stinks. The process is shit, the candidates are awful, everything seems pretty bleak.
BUT- thank god he's charismatic at least. Adds a pleasantry to the ordeal. Then again, after 8 years of the current office a 8 foot turd might seem appealing. (certainly more appealing than hillary or mccain)
Anyways, there's a bit of my thoughts, I think it's worth noting for people outside america how dramatized/staged the entire media coverage is to a sickening fucking level.