Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:14 am
showguns wrote:lego bricks
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
The plural of Lego is....
Page 7 of 35
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:15 am
I do.showguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?
It sounds cute ok.showguns wrote:fishes?
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:16 am
That's just stupid.perkalerk215 wrote:mouses?showguns wrote:fishes?Chu wrote:Exactlyshowguns wrote:who the fuck says sheeps?Chu wrote:It's just the old sheep/sheeps debate but squarer, made of plastic and a multitude of colours.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:19 am
Only one person did that.£10 Bag wrote:all the people calling it 'leggo' obviously don't know shit.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:20 am
Not giving birth?Thomas wrote:Stepping on a lego brick is the most painfull thing in the world.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:25 am
You don't call them KLEENEXes though do you, you just say "a box of Kleenex", like "a box of Lego".perkalerk215 wrote:DUDE..if youre calling the block itself by the name it was born as (lego)...then its just LEGO BLOCKS.if you call the blocks a diff name like how tissues are called KLEENEX...same thing. its not fuckin rocket science! its legoS. if im wrong, ill cut off a finger.
Now start chopping
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:26 am
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/Phaelon wrote:it is a much different thing to speak outloud and not fully annunciate or pronounce every syllable (in which many different groups of people do) and to run words together while speaking. It is another to write these psuedo-words and end up looking rediculous.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:29 am
the plural of CHEESE is not CHEESES..Parson wrote:hold up hold up hold up
legos is still way more correct than lego as a plural as it addresses that the blocks are nouns
calling plural lego is wrong in more ways than i can get my head around
anybody calling the plural of lego, lego is clearly bonkers
legos or lego pieces and thats that
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:30 am
F.Y.I.
Lego is a verb, and therefore has no plural.
.
Lego is a verb, and therefore has no plural.
.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:30 am
WastemanNoSpin wrote:
Showerman
Ya dun know about Dennis!
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:32 am
And is also grammatically correct. Fish and Fishes are both accepted collective nouns.ana wrote:It sounds cute ok.showguns wrote:fishes?
School up!
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:15 am
Let's ask Steven:
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:18 am
Giving birth to a baby sized bit of lego might top that. Well would top that let's face it. Still bound to get the National Enquirer front page anywayana wrote:Not giving birth?Thomas wrote:Stepping on a lego brick is the most painfull thing in the world.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:28 pm
"pick up your goddamn lego" just doesn't sound plural
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:33 pm
It's "pick up your lego you little bastard, I got it in my fackin feet you cahnt" is the UK versionParson wrote:"pick up your goddamn lego" just doesn't sound plural
Might work with hippos though
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:03 pm
see, that sounds fine so long as its not plural
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:08 pm
i thought work enough was enough to make me wanna throw my computer across the room...
giving birth and sleeping on a giant lego are completely different. and i highly doubt you will ever be able to experience that since no one would ever want to reproduce such ridiculously ugly babies that would come out of your womb.
i said it.
next. its seriously ridiculous to hear someone say "go clean up your LEGO"...if my mom said that to me when i was little, id go over and pick one single one block up. if you are calling it as a brand name, it is just LEGO. but if youre trying to call it as a noun, then it is like block....you dont say "pick up your block" when theres hundreds on the floor. you say "pick up your blockS"..much like legoS.
and the KLEENEX thing was a bad example. i guess. my fault. so come here and cut it off for me. maybe it would help my day get a little more interesting instead of completely retarded.
and ps. fishes doesnt sound cute at all. you sound like a 3 yr old kid who is just simply STUPID.
giving birth and sleeping on a giant lego are completely different. and i highly doubt you will ever be able to experience that since no one would ever want to reproduce such ridiculously ugly babies that would come out of your womb.
i said it. next. its seriously ridiculous to hear someone say "go clean up your LEGO"...if my mom said that to me when i was little, id go over and pick one single one block up. if you are calling it as a brand name, it is just LEGO. but if youre trying to call it as a noun, then it is like block....you dont say "pick up your block" when theres hundreds on the floor. you say "pick up your blockS"..much like legoS.
and the KLEENEX thing was a bad example. i guess. my fault. so come here and cut it off for me. maybe it would help my day get a little more interesting instead of completely retarded.
and ps. fishes doesnt sound cute at all. you sound like a 3 yr old kid who is just simply STUPID.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:28 pm
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:56 pm
If you have a couple of Eggo waffles, then you have a couple of Eggos. If you have a couple of Lego peices, then you have a couple of Legos.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:00 pm
It's not the same, you're wrong and you should just get over it. Someone should ask a dane, they're the one's that invented it.Kate... wrote:If you have a couple of Eggo waffles, then you have a couple of Eggos. If you have a couple of Lego peices, then you have a couple of Legos.
Might just complicate things further though