Dubstepforum.com

dp

i did

was scared of being on the "list"

XOR wrote:I don't get it...Parson was rude from the outset and aggressive to many, particularly to Seckle and Stanton, and yet people are saying they don't see what he did wrong. He may have been smart and entertaining in the past, but seriously, he was way too defensive in this thread.

Just out of interest Parson (and this is a serious question), are you that removed from open-mindedness and the general consensus, that you can't see that your beliefs might draw a little well intentioned jokery, that your aggressive reactions might just get in the way of proper discussion once the jokes were done?

after reading the locked thread I absolutely agree. It's really hard for me to understand how someone can take this stuff so seriously. Being offended and going away from the forum is just childish...

BlizzardMusic wrote:

Parson wrote:don't take my word or seckle's

read the thread and draw your own conclusions

ive already read it.

i just cant see what you actually did wrong in the thread.

Me too and neither can I.

claw wrote:parsons good folk, so are the others i know that have been banned/left from here....people need to remember its just a forum, not get so caught up in 'serious' heated discussions

respect!

it sucks that whenever that topic is brought up, it is met with condescending people laced in smugness. all i saw was parson reflecting the ignorance that was sent to him in kind. there is nothing wrong with standing up for oneself. its a real bummer that homie was chastised for sticking up for himself... but that just so happens to be the state of affairs.

respect to the truth seekers and the free thinkers! your time.

parson is a right good fellow. he is an active seeker of the truth. he makes sincere attempts to understand his own subjectivity and how it may contribute to that truth.

in this instance, i saw that parson was presenting his views for others to see, and responding to criticism as best he could with the knowledge that he possessed.

what human being does not respond to mockery of their views? i'm not excusing unkind words, but i will say that i don't view him as acting aggressively. not everyone has the finesse of a poet, but that doesn't mean they don't deserve an open forum among their peers. of course, stating your views will open you to criticism. but there should be a standard; nonsense ridicule and willfull mockery should be below that.

if you think you've got life figured out because you've read a few books concerning the illuminati or occult practices, i wish you the best. i hope i never pretend to know as much, because i never will. life is a constant process, and i applaud those of you continuing in the collective pursuit of understanding

let me also remind you - lest we all forget.

parson
is a catbot


FYI

bloody knew it he seemed a bit cat botish

Man, i don't post in this section enough. That illuminati thread was like a Jane Austen novel

Bob Crunkhouse wrote:told me to eat a bowl of dicks...

But really...

Who among us can say they themselves havent at one time directed another to consume a dick bowl?

wow, a lot can happen while youre asleep.

I don't like most of what's happened. Parson definitely has a point.

boi...

yeah id be a bit pissy if i was parson to but you gota expect people to dissagree with ya and theres no point getting to aggie about it , poor tnuc probably just having a shitty day or something .

Wow, that all got a bit full on.

It seems as though I wasn't believed when I was trying to make peace with Mr P, I was honestly. It'll be shame if he stops posting on here. Sorry if I've come across as a pompous dickhead.

This whole things just a bit well, silly really. Discussions about threads, people getting heated and taking things personally, moderating decisions being taken into question, it's infringing on our liberties, make them pay, string em up by their boots etc etc, it's all just a bit too earnest to sit comfortably with me.

Jubscarz wrote:Discussions about threads

it's quite postmodern.

gah wish you hadn't reminded me about postmodernism. it's the most annoying thing i've ever had to study. yes it's worse than physics

BlizzardMusic wrote:

Ashley wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:

Ashley wrote:

BlizzardMusic wrote:BTW, theres only one admin. And thats seckle, so you might as well call him directly.

So whats dubway then?

Hes called a forum owner.
You know, them things that own forums?

Send a Private Message to one of the Moderators:
Boomnoise
ThinKing
Ricky Ricardo
BunZero
Conspira
Joe Nice

Send a Private Message To an Admin
Seckle

Send a Private Message To The Forum Owner
Dubway
Email The Forum Owner
dubway@dubstepforum.com

-

see, i even bolded out the text so even your pathetic brain can understand! u'll thank me later.

As far as I am concerned and the way phpBB is set up they are both under the administrator group.

Might own the forum but he is still an admin.


Anyways moving on from your childish flame baiting, are lumpfish edible?

yeah, theres such thing as lumpfish caviar, so it probably is.

But caviar is fish eggs or fish poo, cant remember which..

But what if I wanted a fillet of lumpfish?

i'm pretty sure it's not fish poo lol. tastes like it though

and i'm sure you could have a fillet, whether it would taste nice i have no idea

Wikipedia wrote:The roe of larger species is used extensively in Danish cuisine, where the fish are known as stenbider. The roe is also used as a delicious and affordable alternative to the sometimes wildly expensive caviar.

i've never had caviar, i mean, it just looks nasty, no thanks.