Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:28 pm
blueberry elephant
I wouldn't bother, it'll probably be ruined by someone responding without having read it and spouting an inane platitude as a response, someone shouting prik, usual pathetic cyber-chirpsing or some other such shit.badger wrote:maybe we should have a "serious discussion" warning thing like the NSFW to warn priks not to read a thread
in light of that.*Grand* wrote:history repeats itself.Shonky wrote:badger wrote:that's the point shonky was making. it should be MORE than that*Grand* wrote:education.. primary school, secondary school, university.. imo
1 to keep you of the streets
2 learn social skills in a formal environment
3 so you can add to the economy *the point i was making*
Decisions made for the benefit of the few are going to create a disastrous chain-reaction for the majority.
it was a geeky rap pun relating to shonky's use of 'completely irrelevant'.badger wrote:maybe we should have a "serious discussion" warning thing like the NSFW to warn priks not to read a thread
So basically cut out the whole bit about oil and the rest of the paragraph to make it look like your comment made sense, and then chuck in a meaningless platitude.*Grand* wrote:in light of that.*Grand* wrote:history repeats itself.Shonky wrote:badger wrote:that's the point shonky was making. it should be MORE than that*Grand* wrote:education.. primary school, secondary school, university.. imo
1 to keep you of the streets
2 learn social skills in a formal environment
3 so you can add to the economy *the point i was making*
Decisions made for the benefit of the few are going to create a disastrous chain-reaction for the majority.
what is it turn against me or something, i was referring to that. hence why i cut out the oil bit. why you acting like a tnuc?Shonky wrote:So basically cut out the whole bit about oil and the rest of the paragraph to make it look like your comment made sense, and then chuck in a meaningless platitude.*Grand* wrote:*Grand* wrote:history repeats itself.Shonky wrote:badger wrote: that's the point shonky was making. it should be MORE than that
Decisions made for the benefit of the few are going to create a disastrous chain-reaction for the majority.
in light of that.
yeah that's true. the great depression largely only happened because people started bandied around the word "depresssion", when previously when there'd been a stock market crash they used the word "slump". people panicked, over-reacted, and the great depression started*Grand* wrote:Well a lot of the slow downs in the last century have been the result of a few simple minded people who have made complete and utter wrong decisions, causing nothing but utter poverty for the majority.
Yep, and if we continue thinking that wealth creation via the consumption of consumer goods when we are rapidly running out of the materials to make them and transport them round the world is a good idea - WE ARE FUCKED*Grand* wrote:Well a lot of the slow downs in the last century have been the result of a few simple minded people who have made complete and utter wrong decisions, causing nothing but utter poverty for the majority.
and what do you suppose we do about it?Shonky wrote:Yep, and if we continue thinking that wealth creation via the consumption of consumer goods when we are rapidly running out of the materials to make them and transport them round the world is a good idea - WE ARE FUCKED*Grand* wrote:Well a lot of the slow downs in the last century have been the result of a few simple minded people who have made complete and utter wrong decisions, causing nothing but utter poverty for the majority.
Thus capitalism being the most useless possible system to actually face the environmental hazards ahead. This was the bit I was referring to
And let's face it the majority of those simple-minded, short-sighted idiots are the ones that have most influence on our society
Irresponsible capitalism, certainly. But capitalism could be sustainable if it's tempered by common sense and responsibility.Thus capitalism being the most useless possible system to actually face the environmental hazards ahead.
Which of course would be capitalism that isn't entirely focused on profit, a complete contradiction in terms. But the capitalism model could still work if the aims are tempered by responsible consideration of the methodssome fat fuck wrote: Irresponsible capitalism, certainly. But capitalism could be sustainable if it's tempered by common sense and responsibility.
I was pointing out that your assumption that economic growth is the be-all and end-all is not sustainable and that something drastic needs to be done, which businesses will not do as it affects their margins, and governments will not do because they see growth as far more important than the planet. On a personal level, reduce the carbon footprint through less air travel, try and buy local produce, reduce the amount of unnecessary consumer shit and generally try and cause as little damage as possible.*Grand* wrote:and what do you suppose we do about it?Shonky wrote:Yep, and if we continue thinking that wealth creation via the consumption of consumer goods when we are rapidly running out of the materials to make them and transport them round the world is a good idea - WE ARE FUCKED*Grand* wrote:Well a lot of the slow downs in the last century have been the result of a few simple minded people who have made complete and utter wrong decisions, causing nothing but utter poverty for the majority.
Thus capitalism being the most useless possible system to actually face the environmental hazards ahead. This was the bit I was referring to
And let's face it the majority of those simple-minded, short-sighted idiots are the ones that have most influence on our society