Page 7 of 9

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:32 am
by ufo over easy
Paulie wrote: Ooh, there's a lefty in the house. Maybe we should all grow our own food and sing songs about making the world a better place?
Maybe you should start making some sense.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:34 am
by metalboxproducts
Paulie wrote:
NINE wrote:
Paulie wrote:
It's hilarious that the most divisive, destructive influence in society today is in such complete denial, at least at foot soldier / grunt level.
lol
not clear on the direct links between dubstep and international finance capital, but we'll all take your word for it.
Ooh, there's a lefty in the house. Maybe we should all grow our own food and sing songs about making the world a better place?
:lol:

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:35 am
by joseph-j
What we're confusing are people who are good for the scene and people are aren't.

We shouldn't dismiss Martin as a journalist just because people like Vice Magazine have an objectionable, patronising, semi-rascist slant on dubstep and grime.

They're the people that should be targeted, cause they see the scene as a joke, a novelty.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:36 am
by paulie
UFO over easy wrote:
Paulie wrote: Ooh, there's a lefty in the house. Maybe we should all grow our own food and sing songs about making the world a better place?
Maybe you should start making some sense.
I've been pretty consistent in this thread, I think you'll find. My basic point is that journalism and the media's contribution to society and everything within it is a negative one. It's not that hard to understand is it?

Yes I do feel qualified to make such a generalisation, before anyone starts whinging.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:37 am
by batfink
Paulie wrote:
Batfink wrote:
Paulie wrote:It's hilarious that the most divisive, destructive influence in society today is in such complete denial, at least at foot soldier / grunt level.
:o

jeez man. i think you're confusing the issue a bit. Are we talking about dubstep critics or are we getting in to the thorny territory of political bias in news journalism?

I think tarring all journalists with a shitty brush for the misdemeanours of a select few is short sighted at best.
No i was talking about the media in general. It's all the same really.
Ah, so you are generalising. How much deep analysis of "the media" have you done in order to to be able to make statements like "It's all the same really"?

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:38 am
by ufo over easy
Paulie wrote: I've been pretty consistent in this thread
Consistently moronic.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:38 am
by mr. messer
Joseph-J wrote:What we're confusing are people who are good for the scene and people are aren't.

We shouldn't dismiss Martin as a journalist just because people like Vice Magazine have an objectionable, patronising, semi-rascist slant on dubstep and grime.

They're the people that should be targeted, cause they see the scene as a joke, a novelty.
for fuck sake

if Vice has gotten to you, then theyve done their job! theyre not to be taken seriously! theyre a joke ting. theyre taking the piss out of your scene cos they know it gets to people like you!

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:38 am
by joseph-j
Eh???

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:39 am
by mr. messer
im sorry, i thought u said something about vice magazine.

boys goin blind!

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:40 am
by joseph-j
What did I say?

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:40 am
by mr. messer
lol. your quick ting edits. crafty

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:41 am
by joseph-j
Didn't edit nuffink mate, and yeah I did say something negative about Vice and positive about Martin Clark, so I'm not sure what your issue is.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:41 am
by paulie
UFO over easy wrote:
Paulie wrote: I've been pretty consistent in this thread
Consistently moronic.
Care to expand on that, Confucius?

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:42 am
by ufo over easy
Paulie wrote:
Care to expand on that, Confucius?
Nah. I don't like backing up my arguments either :)

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:42 am
by tronman
take this to dissenssus please

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:43 am
by mr. messer
Joseph-J wrote:Didn't edit nuffink mate, and yeah I did say something negative about Vice and positive about Martin Clark, so I'm not sure what your issue is.
BOOM CHILE

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:44 am
by spaceboy
NINE wrote:
Paulie wrote:
It's hilarious that the most divisive, destructive influence in society today is in such complete denial, at least at foot soldier / grunt level.
lol
not clear on the direct links between dubstep and international finance capital, but we'll all take your word for it.
its quite simple really. You entertain us. Like a court-jester would've done to his King. Only jokin steve...but international finance capital...that sounds serious. :D

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:50 am
by zap pow
tronman wrote:take this to dissenssus please
Yeah, can we just have a list of big tunes and release dates, please? There isn't nearly enough of that on here.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:53 am
by tronman
zap pow wrote:
tronman wrote:take this to dissenssus please
Yeah, can we just have a list of big tunes and release dates, please? There isn't nearly enough of that on here.
Image

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:54 am
by mr. messer
i think its time Ricky Blaze spoke up.

why are u so dormant, sir? we would really like to know what you think! your opinion is valued among the dubstep community.

RICKY BLAZE you are SUMMONED rooboy.