Dubstepforum.com

gwa wrote:Sub sub forum for the SNH?

Laughs and jokes

Deep like titanic mek da dance panik section.

x2.

badger wrote:

bellybelle wrote:i've already gone back to mugging old ladies with my chav...

ooh you on chavgangs?

yes but a lowly one. i only have a machete and a burberry hoodie so i'm taking a very slow road. wanna get me a bus ticket to croydon tho. i'm workin at it

gwa wrote:

gwa wrote:Sub sub forum for the SNH?

Laughs and jokes

Deep like titanic mek da dance panik section.

x2.

x3.

you joined our gang yet?

badger wrote:you joined our gang yet?

not yet. i should tho....for protection from these other hooligans!

i want a new subforum for real discussion about real shit along the lines of low-bee's knowledge jewels forum

it has become quite impossible to have intelligent discussion here.

ChristopherA wrote:it has become quite impossible to have intelligent discussion here.

QFT

i'm afraid that even attempting to call any kind of discussion "intelligent" is going to result in a wave of indignant moaning about how i think i'm so much better than everybody

ChristopherA wrote:i want a new subforum for real discussion about real shit along the lines of low-bee's knowledge jewels forum

Try here

oh i've got posts all over there, champ. thanks for the tip though.

as a matter of fact, my pot thread there had the exact opposite reaction as here.

well it looks like an interesting site, might lurk for a while.

lol, the original post was made in jest, i thought it twud get....... FAIL.

ChristopherA wrote:oh i've got posts all over there, champ. thanks for the tip though.

as a matter of fact, my pot thread there had the exact opposite reaction as here.

so everyone just agreed with you?

bit boring innit

sooooo....

was watching the news last night and theres this article about how there's a great swathe of women democrats who are turning their backs on Barack Obama, and inteding to vote for McCain. The apparant rationale being that if they use their vote as a unified block it will demonstrate the power of the female vote.

now, much as i would like to see a woman in the white house, this strcuk me as totally militant. in fact i was shouting at the tv. I know alot of people don't seem to think it will make much of a difference if it's a democrat or a republican as president, but i feel differently. I don't know how these women can in good conscience abandon the plight of their nation in favour of some imagined (well that's how it seems to me) slight against them.

what dyall think.

Interesting proposition:
If you don't, we'll lose.
If we do, you'll lose.
So what's the deal?

Ikarai wrote:now, much as i would like to see a woman in the white house, this strcuk me as totally militant. in fact i was shouting at the tv. I know alot of people don't seem to think it will make much of a difference if it's a democrat or a republican as president, but i feel differently. I don't know how these women can in good conscience abandon the plight of their nation in favour of some imagined (well that's how it seems to me) slight against them.

what dyall think.

i think that's typical of militant feminism tbh. not seeing the forest for the trees. surely picking a president should be about the right person for the job and not about either gender or race? to suggest otherwise is incredibly discriminatory if you ask me

this is the exact sort of ridiculousness that makes lots of people lose a lot of respect for a movement that really should deserve it since it should be about equality, but in the end often proves to be more about women getting what they want at the expense of men

badger wrote: women getting what they want at the expense of men

oOoOOo touchy subject badger.
Few militant feminists on this board for sure.

i know there are. i'm not going to censor what i say to please them just like they won't do the same for me

i'm all for feminism when it's about equality (and any form of equality) but a lot of the militant wing couldn't give a fuck about equality and are more concerned about discrimination

badger wrote:i know there are. i'm not going to censor what i say to please them just like they won't do the same for me

i'm all for feminism when it's about equality (and any form of equality) but a lot of the militant wing couldn't give a fuck about equality and are more concerned about discrimination

If your going to argue equal rights it should be for everyone. The moment you start talking about gay rights, black right, womens right etc then the whole issue gets confused. However, the feminist movement has its roots in a very good cause and its more than understandable that it came about.