Dubstepforum.com

svpreme wrote:The whole sea burial thing REEKS of shadiness. As far as I know, we've never done that for any of our other worst enemies that have been killed in combat, so it's perplexing why the US gov't would suddenly become so religiously sensitive.

So as not to enrage Islamistan.

...and the thing is, Uday and Qusay weren't even household names in the way that Osama has become a fixture in the American mindset. Yet the government still provided the media with pics of their corpses, as if to satiate the masses with "proof" of our progress in the middle east.

It's REALLY, REALLY strange that they would treat his death like this and not even let the public get one picture.

svpreme wrote:...and the thing is, Uday and Qusay weren't even household names in the way that Osama has become a fixture in the American mindset. Yet the government still provided the media with pics of their corpses, as if to satiate the masses with "proof" of our progress in the middle east.

It's REALLY, REALLY strange that they would treat his death like this and not even let the public get one picture.

it's been a day son... they announced the shit a few hours ago.

They'll release it.

This sea burial is totally widgety whack. Trying to play nice with the islamic world? Like we'll kill you, but bury you properly? Maybe make nice with his family? That I can see more. Look at the way his family was treated immediately after 9/11.

But still, put me on that conspiracy roster, I don't buy this burial at sea.

svpreme wrote:The whole sea burial thing REEKS of shadiness. As far as I know, we've never done that for any of our other worst enemies that have been killed in combat, so it's perplexing why the US gov't would suddenly become so religiously sensitive.

saudi arabia denied burial rights. by islamic right the body has to be buried within 24hrs of death. they also know that any sort of burial on land, would get ransacked or pillaged, as you say, people need a finality. last night they said that photos and video were taken. i don't know if they'll show the burial at sea, but they'll definitely show a final photo. remember that the final video of sadaam didn't come out immediately.

Badman Juice wrote:8 lines down.

more like wasteman juice

They shouldn't have chucked him into the sea....haven't they seen Transformers 2?

So how does America get jurisdiction in Pakistan to shoot a man on sight?

Now for the most important question....

how much will oil/gasoline/petrol prices increase because of this?

Shit always happens right before the summer.

faust.dtc wrote:So how does America get jurisdiction in Pakistan to shoot a man on sight?

is that all??

i might go shoot a man in pakistan if its only gona cost a tonne...

noam wrote:is that all??

i might go shoot a man in pakistan if its only gona cost a tonne...

Ryanair flights are a tnuc tho' Drop you off in turkey innit

cityzen wrote:

svpreme wrote:The whole sea burial thing REEKS of shadiness. As far as I know, we've never done that for any of our other worst enemies that have been killed in combat, so it's perplexing why the US gov't would suddenly become so religiously sensitive.

So as not to enrage Islamistan.

except burial at sea is uncommon for Muslims...

knell wrote:

cityzen wrote:

svpreme wrote:The whole sea burial thing REEKS of shadiness. As far as I know, we've never done that for any of our other worst enemies that have been killed in combat, so it's perplexing why the US gov't would suddenly become so religiously sensitive.

So as not to enrage Islamistan.

except burial at sea is uncommon for Muslims...

Didn't that party on the boat where Kode9 played al that unreleased Burial shit dock in Turkey? It may be a lot more frequent than you think.

*beats a dead horse*

nah that was Ramadanman

faust.dtc wrote:So how does America get jurisdiction in Pakistan to shoot a man on sight?

7 year agreement
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6649898/

seckle wrote:

faust.dtc wrote:So how does America get jurisdiction in Pakistan to shoot a man on sight?

7 year agreement
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6649898/

GOT EM COACH

faust.dtc wrote:So how does America get jurisdiction in Pakistan to shoot a man on sight?

lol @ this

When you violate UN resolutions (specifically 1373 and the branching resolution) your country loses it's jurisdiction if it impedes another in accordance.

The ease at which the US could prove pakistan violate 1373 would be overwhelming.

kingGhost wrote:

Badman Juice wrote:8 lines down.

more like wasteman juice

sorry for posting a link about islamic burial rites, I know it potentially contradicts your lefty pop politics conspiracy bullshit.

discussions are so much better when everyone agrees.

Badman Juice wrote:

kingGhost wrote:

Badman Juice wrote:8 lines down.

more like wasteman juice

sorry for posting a link about islamic burial rites, I know it potentially contradicts your lefty pop politics conspiracy bullshit.

discussions are so much better when everyone agrees.

i quoted the wrong post, it's hard to distinguish one of your troll attempts from the next.