Dubstepforum.com

gwa wrote:nah he didnt. he's a fucking genius

southstar wrote:

gwa wrote:nah he didnt. he's a fucking genius

You ain't seen his acting then

dubfordessert wrote:thatcher shrank the state and made it possible for people to own their own houses by helping inflate house prices so far into the stratosphere no one can actually afford them without a government funded loan lol

test recordings wrote:

dubfordessert wrote:thatcher shrank the state and made it possible for people to own their own houses by helping inflate house prices so far into the stratosphere no one can actually afford them without a government funded loan lol

Actually, she DIDN'T shrink the state, she just reorganised it:



Here's some figures for you to check yourself as well: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog ... nding-1963 <<< shit holds true as far as I can see Ignore the apparently massive gap shown by the graph and look at the numbers on the table at the bottom of the page. There's never more than about a 5% variance despite the massive sell-off of national capital...

Electric_Head wrote:

southstar wrote:

gwa wrote:nah he didnt. he's a fucking genius

You ain't seen his acting then

It's not an act.

Perej wrote: Yes it is an 'accident' I suppose if you want to put it like that. It's subjective and a matter of opinion.

I am of the opinion that I am entitled to British healthcare more than lets say, a Polish immigrant because my family contributed towards the creation of the NHS and have been living on these shores for atleast 300 years. They have contributed to the economy of this nation for much longer and some of them fought in two World Wars.

I'm not saying people who haven't lived here for many generations should be denied anything (this doesn't happen anyway), but in the case of things like social housing or healthcare, Brits should take precedent. Seems fair no? Pretty sure they have a similar system in other countries regardless of ethnicity.
If you go to the Taj Mahal in India, they have a line for foreign people and a line for Indians, and Indian nationals pay a lot less. Mostly this is justified because many of those living in Agra are impoverished, but there are also a ton of more wealthy Indians who go in for less. It's just basic courtesy.

Just think it's common sense really.

gwa wrote:it's not very liberal to celebrate someone's death.


i'm neutral to her, regardless of what she did

SCope13 wrote:just saying not all life is sacred)

SCope13 wrote:Some people are better off dead. I think it's quite alright to celebrate the death of someone like, say, Hitler. (not comparing Thatcher to Hitler btw, just saying not all life is sacred)