Dubstepforum.com

dont like that spooky refix

dont like the orig either tbh lol

Skeng remix!

why bother with that skeng remix?

much prefer the original

Geey wrote:why bother with that skeng remix?

much prefer the original

Geey wrote:why bother with that skeng remix?

much prefer the original

yeah sounds pretty much the same

It is the same apart from the intro that bigs up kahn & neek, nothing wrong with that.

Geey wrote:why bother with that skeng remix?

it's a dubplate in a soundclash ffs

What's going on with Kung fu kick?

dididub wrote:

Geey wrote:why bother with that skeng remix?

it's a dubplate in a soundclash ffs

make your own tune if you wanna be a big boy at a big boy soundclash imo

lol u never seen a sound clash?

all about the classics with slightly different chorus/lyrics... hence special

Geey wrote:

dididub wrote:

Geey wrote:why bother with that skeng remix?

it's a dubplate in a soundclash ffs

make your own tune if you wanna be a big boy at a big boy soundclash imo

fair enough but you can see why people do specials for soundclashes

i didnt really know many of the tunes vivek played but i'm sure some of them were re-vocaled already made tunes, like that skeng remix

Dub_freak wrote:It is the same apart from the intro that bigs up kahn & neek, nothing wrong with that.

And all the different bars that big up Kahn & Neek & the different arrangement.

I think its sick. Absolute anthem & theyve got a personalised version, not some gash bootleg.

Mad to think how far Kahn's come in the last 3 years that he's managed to get a Skeng remix

soulkids wrote:lol u never seen a sound clash?

all about the classics with slightly different chorus/lyrics... hence special

shit sorry mate, never got round to reading the soundclash rulebook before.

can understand why he got flowdan to re do lyrics of the tune, just cant understand why he never remixed the actual tune aswell?

and because its how people normally do it is such a lame excuse.

im not hating on the guy or the tune, just kinda seems sacrilege bunning one of my favourite tunes.
if it hadnt of been kahn and had of been compa "remaking" the tune most man in this thread would be cussin the guy.

but yea i do agree, man has come a long way in 3 years.
salute to him

Geey wrote:shit sorry mate, never got round to reading the soundclash rulebook before.

No need to get sarcastic just cause you made the basic error of not knowing what a soundclash actually is. If you're even remotely aware of David Rodigan you should understand the general jist of a soundclash.. I highly recommend you watch his Redbull lecture, its an INCREDIBLE story and by the end you'll understand exactly what a soundclash is.. his Sopranos dub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Geey wrote:can understand why he got flowdan to re do lyrics of the tune, just cant understand why he never remixed the actual tune aswell?

Again, I advise you to watch the Rodigan redbull lecture.. but if you cba and I know you were taking the piss before but the main rules of a traditional soundclash is you have to have your name mentioned on the dub (so its personalised to you) and you can't play the same tune as the other guy... so you don't even need to be a producer to clash and you don't need to spend ages remixing tunes.. you probably don't even need permission from the guy who produced the original you just need personalised vocals.

Geey wrote:and because its how people normally do it is such a lame excuse.

Not really, also its not an excuse its an explanation to your misunderstanding of what a soundclash is.. I don't think anybody is trying to make an excuse for why Kahn pulled out a traditional soundclash dub instead of a remix

Geey wrote:im not hating on the guy or the tune, just kinda seems sacrilege bunning one of my favourite tunes.
if it hadnt of been kahn and had of been compa "remaking" the tune most man in this thread would be cussin the guy.

Again this comment makes no sense because you don't understand what a soundclash dub is. Theres a reason someone would cuss someone over an unofficial bootleg and not cuss someone over a legitimate dub.

Geey wrote:but yea i do agree, man has come a long way in 3 years.
salute to him

Agreed, to get a dub of Skeng in a couple of years is pretty much one of the best compliments you can get as a producer in the dubstep scene imo. His original Skeng will never get played again

Oh I'd also like to point out that rewording lyrics takes a lot less time than remixing a tune, its just a quick way of having personalised dubs in a clash.

m8son wrote:i didnt really know many of the tunes vivek played but i'm sure some of them were re-vocaled already made tunes, like that skeng remix

Pretty sure he played a re-vocal of his remix of Fully Rankin.

i don't know how flowdan does his business, but it's usually more a question of money than respect for a certain dj. i'm not saying kahn had to pay for his dub though. i'm just surprised there aren't more dubplates around in dubstep. warrior queen voices for money for example.

please stop using the phrase "rules of the sound clash"

if every producer/dj/musician stuck to rules, music would be boring.

i've heard these refixes in soundclashes a thousand times before, its been done.
is it that hard a concept to grasp that someone can break the mould and do something new/different?

i was bunning in soundclashes when you was bunning your momma nipples bruv so stop with the big I AM talk.

^ my bad for trying to help, carry on.

@ Baddis, I think someone on here had a Jah War dub?