Demonstrably, dental health has improved because of it
but it has not cured our aversion to being told to shut up & read.
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:49 pm
by alien pimp
DRTY wrote:
alien pimp wrote:
ADA sucks donkey balls because the list is made only of organisations from the 4 states that use fluoridation (i think australia does too, but they are not on the list either), the only two international orgs are the last two and the claim that WHO endorses their paper is a lie, here's the actual WHO position on it: http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/11/21/21066.aspx
Oh ok, I see how it is. Links you post must be correct, links I post must be part of the system.
my link was to the actual official and genuine WHO document, proving ADA lies. where's your better link on it? i just saw an US org claiming shit without any proof. so what link are you talking about?
and again, maybe you're magma's brother, so i'll repeat myself for the last time: why don't you ask me if i lie and believe what i answer?
complicated logic, huh?
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:51 pm
by alien pimp
sd5 wrote:Yeah, Oz urban areas fluoridize.
Demonstrably, dental health has improved because of it
but it has not cured our aversion to being told to shut up & read.
demonstrate it please!
maybe you also know why they don't support ADA's bullcrap
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:55 pm
by alien pimp
alien pimp wrote:
Examples of dental fluorosis in 8- and 9-year old children
who grew up in fluoridated Auckland, New Zealand
repost for another old friend of mine with reading disabilities
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:56 pm
by DRTY
Yes Alien you're a fucking genius.
Everything is definately a conspiracy. There's a group of people behind the curtain trying to control all the people through things like water fluoridation.
They also faked the moon landing, put explosives in the twin towers, made the federal reserve, and own all media. Oh they're all reptiles too btw. Oh and MMR and every other vaccination is just a mass cull.
I wish I was as enlightened as you are.
I mean, ignore all scientific and medical journals, I saw some l33t video on the internet. And even managed to find other stuff through Google from people that hunt giant extinct birds. I mean, scientists are just part of the system.
Wake up man. And when you're awake look up Confirmation Bias.
Nice picture btw, looks like a pretty fresh study. ALSO POSTED BY A LUNATIC CHASING GIANT EXTINCT BIRDS.
This is my last post in here, I literally see no way of making you think logically.
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:01 pm
by alien pimp
DRTY wrote:I mean, ignore all scientific and medical journals,
yeah, but you call that just one lame link from some proven liars, i gave you tons of scientific and medical journals, you just can't read
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:02 pm
by alien pimp
+
Dentist advice:
Remember, children should spit out toothpaste after brushing to avoid getting too much fluoride. If too much fluoride is ingested, a condition known as fluorosis can occur. If your child is too young or unable to spit out toothpaste, consider providing them with a fluoride free toothpaste, using no toothpaste, or using only a "pea size" amount of toothpaste.
= ?
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:05 pm
by feral witchchild
DRTY wrote:
they put explosives in the twin towers
So are you saying that people who were actually there who believe this are lying to themselves?
There's skepticism, and then there's straight up ignoring facts and logic.
Though I'm sure you'll accuse these people of lying for "the money" or some stupid shit.
EDIT: Really sorry to derail the thread but I took personal offense to that.
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:10 pm
by magma
alien pimp wrote: +
Dentist advice:
Remember, children should spit out toothpaste after brushing to avoid getting too much fluoride. If too much fluoride is ingested, a condition known as fluorosis can occur. If your child is too young or unable to spit out toothpaste, consider providing them with a fluoride free toothpaste, using no toothpaste, or using only a "pea size" amount of toothpaste.
= ?
I said all that in one of my first posts on the subject. I even told you that I knew a girl at school who got it. You can treat it through most teeth-whitening procedures these days.
This is a genuine danger of fluoridation, but it's not life threatening and/or mind controlling.
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:14 pm
by DRTY
feral witchchild wrote:
EDIT: Really sorry to derail the thread but I took personal offense to that.
Sorry if I offended you, my implication was that 'the people behind the curtain', not that there was/wasn't. Should've made that clearer.
EDIT: I don't think you need to worry about de-railing this thread about Coca Cola
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:16 pm
by alien pimp
144 cities in US and UK that decided to "ignore all scientific and medical journals", alongside most of the civilized world, except for 5 countries: http://www.nofluoride.com/cities_rejecting.cfm
conspirationists!
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:17 pm
by DRTY
alien pimp wrote:144 cities in US and UK that decided to "ignore all scientific and medical journals", alongside most of the civilized world, except for 5 countries: http://www.nofluoride.com/cities_rejecting.cfm
conspirationists!
Because they all bit the fear media bullshit created by people like yourself.
alien pimp wrote:144 cities in US and UK that decided to "ignore all scientific and medical journals", alongside most of the civilized world, except for 5 countries: http://www.nofluoride.com/cities_rejecting.cfm
conspirationists!
Because they all bit the fear media bullshit created by people like yourself.
Alien Pimp deepthroated a throbbing media campaign 20 years ago and is still regurgitating the massive load of "truth-juice" he imbibed.
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:25 pm
by alien pimp
DRTY wrote:
alien pimp wrote:144 cities in US and UK that decided to "ignore all scientific and medical journals", alongside most of the civilized world, except for 5 countries: http://www.nofluoride.com/cities_rejecting.cfm
conspirationists!
Because they all bit the fear media bullshit created by people like yourself.
alien pimp wrote:144 cities in US and UK that decided to "ignore all scientific and medical journals", alongside most of the civilized world, except for 5 countries: http://www.nofluoride.com/cities_rejecting.cfm
conspirationists!
Because they all bit the fear media bullshit created by people like yourself.
stupid ppl, innit?
this shit it's all over the media and they all fell for it, right?
except for some parts of 5 countries
shiit, SD5 will be disappointed too, but no fluoridation has same effects as fluoridation, so it's gotta be fluoridation:
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:26 pm
by feral witchchild
DRTY wrote:
Sorry if I offended you, my implication was that 'the people behind the curtain', not that there was/wasn't. Should've made that clearer.
EDIT: I don't think you need to worry about de-railing this thread about Coca Cola
Ah, it's all good, man. For the record, I do agree with you that there likely isn't some grand unifying conspiracy which ties all of the stuff you mentioned in together, and I do think that most conspiracy theories are ridiculous to some extent (and I do think people who are heavily into them are sometimes affected by the whole confirmation bias thing), but the whole 9/11 thing IS pretty shady if you actually look into it. That being said, I don't by any means believe that no planes hit the towers. lol I just think it's possible that there were also explosives inside the buildings to help things along, based on the testimonies of people who were there. It's not really the kind of thing I want to believe, by any means. :/
...and yeah, this thread has certainly come a long way. lol
Re: Coke Addiction
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:30 pm
by DRTY
Another massively accurate source that wouldn't be at all biased 'nofluoride.com' Fucking hell man, do you not see?
Here's a 125 page case study into the fluordation of water. This paper has been published, and still exists (that means it has not been disproven); that's what the scientific community does btw. They publish findings in journals. Then other scientists do their absolute best to disprove it. Not maliciously, just to self criticise.
On that link btw, you want to click the bit that says; Full Report (it's a PDF).
That's one of the only official papers I can find. There's one on the BMJ and Science Direct but you have to pay to access them. (I presume you don't want to.)
DRTY wrote:Another massively accurate source that wouldn't be at all biased 'nofluoride.com' Fucking hell man, do you not see?
Here's a 125 page case study into the fluordation of water. This paper has been published, and still exists (that means it has not been disproven); that's what the scientific community does btw. They publish findings in journals. Then other scientists do their absolute best to disprove it. Not maliciously, just to self criticise.
On that link btw, you want to click the bit that says; Full Report (it's a PDF).
That's one of the only official papers I can find. There's one on the BMJ and Science Direct but you have to pay to access them. (I presume you don't want to.)
it's indecent to ask me to read 125 pages when you didn't even read properly the posts you are answering, not to mention the linked shit.
but because i'm such a nice guy, i'll share with you what i found on your own link, which obviously you didn't bother to really read either:
Findings: The review found that although a large number of studies had been conducted over the previous 50 years, there was a lack of reliable, good quality evidence in the fluoridation literature world-wide. The available evidence suggests that water fluoridation reduces caries prevalence but the degree to which it does is not clear from the data (results of individual studies ranged from a substantial reduction to a slight increase in prevalence). The available evidence also suggests that this beneficial effect also came at the expense of a likely increase in the prevalence of dental fluorosis (mottled teeth). The research evidence is of insufficient quality to allow confident statements about other potential harms or whether there is any impact on social inequalities. This evidence on benefits and harms needs to be considered along with the ethical, environmental, ecological, costs and legal issues that surround any decisions about water fluoridation. All of these issues fell outside the scope of this review. Further details and information can be found on the review web page.
i mean, after this one i'm entitled to ask: how far are you ready to go in proving yourself stupid, after believing what ADA says about WHO and not what WHO itself says?
