Page 97 of 162
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:17 am
by jiba
Love those bits Incinic!
New stuff from me:

More of the
Of You Series
Have just set up a FaceBook page also if anyone cares:
Rich Johns Photography
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:58 pm
by crackf
i dono somethin i did today, ill put up some drawings an sheeet in a piece
some real orgasmic stuff goin on in this thread though!!!
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:59 pm
by crackf
lol damn tiny picture and bad quality, nice one imageshack
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:04 am
by DZA
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:06 pm
by Dutchstep


couse Caspa is awsum
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:30 pm
by nasty biznes
DID THIS LAST NIGHT AS I WAS BORED
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:34 pm
by Dutchstep
holy fuck, what did you use?
me want some
nice work tough
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:29 am
by jaydot
Little logo I made i MS paint
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 5:35 pm
by Dutchstep
never ever save as JPG
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:41 pm
by horse
Dutchstep wrote:never ever save as JPG
i deal almost exclusively in JPEGs
why would you never save in JPEG?
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:35 am
by jiba
horse wrote:Dutchstep wrote:never ever save as JPG
i deal almost exclusively in JPEGs
why would you never save in JPEG?
I always save my work as a layer based photoshop file .PSD, a maximum resolution, 300dpi .JPG, a smaller low resolution .JPG for uploading onto various sites and a hi res, 300dpi .PDF for the ones that go to the print shop.
What is your reasoning for not saving in JPEG Dutchstep? I do know that my colours alter ever so slightly for each of these 3 different file formats, and JPEGs are of a slightly lower quality, but at 300dpi you would have to be blowing it up to the size of a giant building to notice any major discrepancies imo.
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:07 am
by jiba
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:59 am
by horse
outstanding work as usual mate.
love the muted blue hues on those.
personally, if i had to pick my favourite - i would go for the bathtub image.
your link doesnt work tho so i cant go vote!!
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:11 am
by incnic
she looks like a junkie imo.
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:23 am
by jiba
Thanks Horse!!
Have fixed the link I think haha
Was trying to go for the whole zombie look, it worked in some of them, but yeah, some of them do look quite junky like, think it comes down to the tones, the wet hair and the almost gaunt look in some of them due to trying to retain the fake blood in the mouth for extended periods of time, In some of the other shots she looks more like the victim of a brutal assault.
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:51 am
by horse
voted.
had a look through the other entries.
i dont think youve got anything to worry about man, 99% of the others are fucking terrible. some truly astoundingly bad photoshop work in some of them. and awful photography in the rest!!
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:05 pm
by gnome
4 and 5 are my fav. You got my vote!
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 10:55 pm
by Dutchstep
jiba wrote:horse wrote:Dutchstep wrote:never ever save as JPG
i deal almost exclusively in JPEGs
why would you never save in JPEG?
I always save my work as a layer based photoshop file .PSD, a maximum resolution, 300dpi .JPG, a smaller low resolution .JPG for uploading onto various sites and a hi res, 300dpi .PDF for the ones that go to the print shop.
What is your reasoning for not saving in JPEG Dutchstep? I do know that my colours alter ever so slightly for each of these 3 different file formats, and JPEGs are of a slightly lower quality, but at 300dpi you would have to be blowing it up to the size of a giant building to notice any major discrepancies imo.
not with things like this:

it's not to everything, sometimes the difference isn't disturbing ( like huge photo's )
but right now it looks like a crappy paint whore, (no offence)
PSD is way to high, PNG & BMP are way way better
because this is the difference between PNG & JPEG,
so when you use a font in your work, never use JPEG
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:34 am
by helix
Jpg is like mp3, it's useful to show somebody a preview, but when it comes to the finished product, you want a different format.
Re: The artwork thread ...NSFW
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:28 am
by incnic
except that i bet you cant tell the difference between a 5k level 12 jpg and any lossless format
much like wavs / mp3s.
much of a muchness