Page 2 of 3
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:55 pm
by firky
Frodo wrote:The whole coverage is a disgrace though. Even the BBC asked her in an interview.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:01 am
by boomstix
fuck sake
can't the others afford steroids or something?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:59 am
by MikeE
ok, I really regret googling china clit now..
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:07 am
by Dead Rats
Firky wrote:she wasn't my nan she was just some oap i fucked for her fox's glacier mints
Mate, I actually understand.
Mmmmm....Fox Glacier Mints....
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:50 am
by triptych
Any news on this yet?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:32 pm
by frodo
Triptych wrote:Any news on this yet?
Apparently it will take at least two more weeks.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:29 pm
by Whistla
this has been an issue in the olympics since day one.
how do you decide gender as its a role the individual assigns to themselves and as sum1 posted already, can change!
so, what do you do in that situation?
shud it be done on "muscle mass" and the whole idea of gender specific contests be abandoned? as like clearly this athelete has a more stereotypically masculine physic than the other competitors and is therefore probably genetically pre-disposed to run faster than those without such a physic.
its a difficult one imo.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:22 pm
by firky
think it's disgusting that her sex is being discussed in the news, it should have been done in private. She could have some Androgen or Intasex disorder that she didn't previously know about and now she is going to be labelled a freak, plus her mental health is going to take one helluva hit. If there was any doubt it should have been aired prior the event and not after it, again in private. She's only 18 and this is going to be seriously damaging for her
Plus it borders dangerously close to eugenics for me.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:53 pm
by triptych
Firky wrote:Plus it borders dangerously close to eugenics for me.
It's not really eugenics, unless she's been bred by the new world order to create a genetic-freak super woman is it?
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:28 pm
by firky
It could be said to be borderline eugenics insofar as it is a scientific selective process as to what constitutes a person to be of one particular sex and if anything deters from that it is considered 'not normal'.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:49 pm
by mr_vega
As i said. It's just really embarrassing. I just hope that it does turn out to be a man because, let's face it, that's a sensational fucking news story.
But I did put that "some other freaky shit" category in there for a reason. I.e. Open to debate. Possible hermie? Possible post-operation? Possible Lady Gaga???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUlSCpURc3M (ONE MINUTE IN!. Look at it 1:00) They're everywhere!!!!!!!!

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:10 pm
by mr_vega
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:10 pm
by fretn
that china clit is horrific
wth man...
instant fail

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:16 pm
by triptych
Gina Carano is so fit though.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:34 pm
by xarcane
This is ridiculous. I don't see them testing any of the female shotputters to see if their women and they look far more manly.
This is complete bullshit
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:41 pm
by mr_vega
I officially turn this into the new "Questionable female athlete thread"! Any dodgy looking 'female' sportsperson shall be named and maybe shamed here.
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:47 pm
by mr_vega
Triptych wrote:
Gina Carano is so fit though.
yeah of course, she's hotness. that's what i mean though. there was only gonna be one winner there. the one with at least one testicle.
Re: Female athlete might have penis.
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 12:57 pm
by the acid never lies
This one actually is a man. Plus has the unfortunate name that is Sithole *sadface*
Re: Female athlete might have penis.
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:10 pm
by set records
if she fancies herself a woman, she's a woman. doesn't matter what the genetalia says tbh.
Re: Female athlete might have penis.
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:11 pm
by collige
set records wrote:if she fancies herself a woman, she's a woman. doesn't matter what the genetalia says tbh.
I agree 100%. But the issues of hormones, etc. make the sex (not gender) of an athlete relevant.