Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:48 pm
deamonds wrote:you just ruined dubstep
Dubstepforum.com
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Anyone else kinda not looking forward to dubstep being big?
Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:49 pm
Displaced wrote:Joined: 15 May 2009
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:49 pm
Btw your getting parred at a rate you don't see on here very often, congratulations!
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:50 pm
86 Position wrote:roflThe_Dza88 wrote:Cus the first time people heard of dubstep is the date they joined the forum86 Position wrote:how is him joining on may 15h relevant..
the human mind knows how to reach and make "logical" connections out of nowhere, based on nothing at all. very interesting indeed
edit: thinking about it, maybe you were actually being serious...that's even more hilarious
I wasnt being serious you fool hence the rolling eyes 
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:53 pm
rolling eyes are wasteThe_Dza88 wrote:86 Position wrote:roflThe_Dza88 wrote:Cus the first time people heard of dubstep is the date they joined the forum86 Position wrote:how is him joining on may 15h relevant..
the human mind knows how to reach and make "logical" connections out of nowhere, based on nothing at all. very interesting indeed
edit: thinking about it, maybe you were actually being serious...that's even more hilarious
Re: Anyone else kinda not looking forward to dubstep being b
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Oh god, the skinny jeans people ruining the precious scene.Zane wrote:Some of you are gonna wonder what the fuck I'm on about there but it's a serious question. But I think it's safe to say that when any genre starts going through the corporate mill it often comes out the other side a little bit too shiny, a little bit too samey, and a little bit too shit.
When something is small and people are into it, they're usually pretty real about whatever "something" is. When it gets big, you get the bandwagon jumpers, scenesters, fakers, pretend experts etc (and don't get me wrong, we get this now).
I cringe when I hear "dubstep explosion" (FaltyDL interview on XLR8R) and other similar terms. I know it's a great thing that it's gonna be big and we'll all have more people to talk about it with but I just can't really say I want that to happen.
But at the same time I'm being a little bit elitist here and I know that. "Yeah we're the "underground"!" - "Fuck the mainstream", "I knew this before you did". etc. And I fully realise this. But I think for dubstep to remain true to it's shit, this is gonna be a bad thing... Or maybe it's just a positive evolution of the genre? I don't fucking know to be honest.
I just really hope the skinny jeans crowd don't get on it. Oh my daze.
(also gonna post this on my blog - would appreciate you guys taking a look - link below)
P.S your location indicates you like dub not dubstep, they are 2 different things.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:57 pm
Ok bear in mind I'm coming from an Irish perspective. We've had a few nice things over the past couple of years here but there's no "movement" here yet as such.. But it's on the way.
I think some of you are missing the point here though. Or maybe I didn't say what I wanted to in the right way.
"Electro" for example. Is shite. The poppy-electro all the "indie-electro" nights play anyway. This for me is because they've been corrupted by the "this is working! keep doing it! fuck that it sounds the same!" attitude. It's making money so why change something if it isn't broken etc. Which is fine. I don't believe in sellouts, everyone has to make money. But it's at the cost of the original, less-refined sound that was there in the first place.
And I would prefer if that didn't hapeen to dubstep. Feel me?
I think some of you are missing the point here though. Or maybe I didn't say what I wanted to in the right way.
"Electro" for example. Is shite. The poppy-electro all the "indie-electro" nights play anyway. This for me is because they've been corrupted by the "this is working! keep doing it! fuck that it sounds the same!" attitude. It's making money so why change something if it isn't broken etc. Which is fine. I don't believe in sellouts, everyone has to make money. But it's at the cost of the original, less-refined sound that was there in the first place.
And I would prefer if that didn't hapeen to dubstep. Feel me?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:58 pm
YOUR FUCKING WASTEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!86 Position wrote:rolling eyes are wasteThe_Dza88 wrote:86 Position wrote:roflThe_Dza88 wrote:Cus the first time people heard of dubstep is the date they joined the forum86 Position wrote:how is him joining on may 15h relevant..
the human mind knows how to reach and make "logical" connections out of nowhere, based on nothing at all. very interesting indeed
edit: thinking about it, maybe you were actually being serious...that's even more hilarious
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:00 pm
I hate it when people get your and you're mixed up.The_Dza88 wrote:YOUR FUCKING WASTEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!86 Position wrote:rolling eyes are wasteThe_Dza88 wrote:86 Position wrote:roflThe_Dza88 wrote: Cus the first time people heard of dubstep is the date they joined the forum
the human mind knows how to reach and make "logical" connections out of nowhere, based on nothing at all. very interesting indeed
edit: thinking about it, maybe you were actually being serious...that's even more hilarious
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:03 pm
Re: Anyone else kinda not looking forward to dubstep being b
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:04 pm
Sly digs like that and the "Joined: May 15th" are weak. I'm just trying to have a conversation.
I'm from Dublin.
I'm from Dublin.
techdub wrote:Oh god, the skinny jeans people ruining the precious scene.Zane wrote:Some of you are gonna wonder what the fuck I'm on about there but it's a serious question. But I think it's safe to say that when any genre starts going through the corporate mill it often comes out the other side a little bit too shiny, a little bit too samey, and a little bit too shit.
When something is small and people are into it, they're usually pretty real about whatever "something" is. When it gets big, you get the bandwagon jumpers, scenesters, fakers, pretend experts etc (and don't get me wrong, we get this now).
I cringe when I hear "dubstep explosion" (FaltyDL interview on XLR8R) and other similar terms. I know it's a great thing that it's gonna be big and we'll all have more people to talk about it with but I just can't really say I want that to happen.
But at the same time I'm being a little bit elitist here and I know that. "Yeah we're the "underground"!" - "Fuck the mainstream", "I knew this before you did". etc. And I fully realise this. But I think for dubstep to remain true to it's shit, this is gonna be a bad thing... Or maybe it's just a positive evolution of the genre? I don't fucking know to be honest.
I just really hope the skinny jeans crowd don't get on it. Oh my daze.
(also gonna post this on my blog - would appreciate you guys taking a look - link below)
P.S your location indicates you like dub not dubstep, they are 2 different things.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:07 pm
Im all for the scene to grow and become more popular however what I am concerned about is that as dubstep becomes more popular the music will ultimately suffer.
Anthem bashing, cloned derivative productions, reduced experimentation, constrained diversity, and distorted wobble tracks became more endemic. In truth, if this path continues to be the major part of the scene in the future, the genre will burn itself out or turn itself musically and culturally irrelevant in less time than it took to incubate in the dark Croydon shadows.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:14 pm
if the big producers stop making natural music (not making what people always want to hear) and stop loving what there doing then there will be a problem with dubstep getting too big. Look at someone like skream pretty much the biggest name in the scene atm for his tearout stuff, but cos he isnt just playing for the crowd he's making all sorts of stuff, some amazing deeper tunes.
Look at the Dead Weathers Rmx and the Bat For Lashes one, he could of just done a LaRoux but obv that wasnt natural.
Cos dubstep is bigger doesnt automatically mean its worse as lol, although the old dubstep days when it was really underground have been the best of the genre imo...
Look at the Dead Weathers Rmx and the Bat For Lashes one, he could of just done a LaRoux but obv that wasnt natural.
Cos dubstep is bigger doesnt automatically mean its worse as lol, although the old dubstep days when it was really underground have been the best of the genre imo...
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:16 pm
i take it you've never seen the crowd in room 1 at Why Not? then.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:26 pm
its too weird for the masses, its not gonna get much bigger
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:12 pm
there's cats in the production forum that are a few steps ahead of you. there's a "ban the DZA" poll thread in progress...and I think those in favour of "he should go" are in the lead!Sight wrote:<--- The_Dza88
The_Dza88 you seem to have something jammed way up your ass. How about you go take a flying leap ? Honestly... it would do us all good. You and Bandshell should either find some tall building or move to Siberia. Either way... the world is a better place !
Re: Anyone else kinda not looking forward to dubstep being b
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:15 pm
What is that supposed to mean?Zane wrote: I just really hope the skinny jeans crowd don't get on it. Oh my daze.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:16 pm
hooray86 Position wrote:
anyway, it's gonna happen eventually. and then another style of music will be born from the underground, become big, repeeat, and the cycle will repeat itself til the end of time.
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:17 pm
Sight wrote:
The_Dza88 you seem to have something jammed way up your ass. How about you go take a flying leap ? Honestly... it would do us all good. You and Bandshell should either find some tall building or move to Siberia. Either way... the world is a better place !
Its all fake remember