Dubstepforum.com

yeah i know that mate but the joke is funny cos its so typical of dubstepforum users

thrush wrote:i just meant it as a loose way to describe that it may be perceived as a negative thing.

edit: this is exactly what i mean from the guy above me. these forums are always moaning about dubstep being ruined.

Caspa shits on moanerz from a great height.

I had a thread go missing during changeover
It was probably considered unnecessary or crap.
So?
Don't get paranoid or resentful,
get revenge by posting beautifully insightful shit.
(like I do)

The irony here is:

People complain there is nothing different going on. Too many producers use the same sounds in their music etc. Then, when someone DOES do something new, its the same tossers who jump in there and say "its not dubstep, this should be in the wonky trip hop country western cowboy stripper music adult contemporary forum".

The good DJs will mix all styles into one set to the point where you dont really need imaginary divider lines between different sounds used.

I remember when it was all just "Techno" nobody cared about packaging up these semi defined styles and making sub genres out of them. Djs would start a set at 110 bpm and end a set at 180 bpm. Tracks were mixed with eachother more due to tempo than genre.

Amen breaks were techno
808 State was techno
Juan Atkins was techno
Carl Cox was techno
Doc Martin was techno
Hardkiss was techno
Future sound of London was techno
Warp records was techno
Moby was techno
Kraftwerk was techno
Aphex Twin was techno
Erasure was techno

If you couldnt mix it all together, you werent finding work as a DJ. Nowdaze, people will spin minimal bleepy microhouse, and thats it.

subgenres are the stupidest thing ever. its gotten to the stage now where's is become subjective so discussing it seems feutile to me. and no, subgenres never have and never will be detrimental to any "scene" quite the opposite i'd say. do you not think it's great that we can lump mala and untold in the same genre?

stop being pedantic and enjoy the tunes mmmmkay?

ur in luck, im an amateur gynacologist

some of this will sort u out http://www.canesten.co.uk/

pdomino wrote:

thrush wrote:i just meant it as a loose way to describe that it may be perceived as a negative thing.

edit: this is exactly what i mean from the guy above me. these forums are always moaning about dubstep being ruined.

Caspa shits on moanerz from a great height.

j_j_c wrote:and no, sub genres never have and never will be detrimental to any "scene" quite the opposite i'd say.

nah man, think about jungle or drum n bass, it was flourishing for so long until the sub genres became so specific and creativity is lost as people just follow the formula to producing what sub genre of the music it is they want.

ironically, the guy above you said

q23 wrote:If you couldnt mix it all together, you werent finding work as a DJ. Nowdaze, people will spin minimal bleepy microhouse, and thats it.

i think that contradicts your opinion j_j_c.

AND FOR THE RECORD I DESPISE THE IDEA OF SUB GENRE'S JUST AS MUCH AS YOU BUT THE SCENE IS PROGRESSING AND THEY'RE BECOMING MORE PROMINENT

thrush wrote:haha no bot. but i was just saying how i think we avoid sub genres so harshly (this thread highlights that i think) and how we use terms to describe sounds like filth for the datsik and borgore sounds, purple for the joker and kito sort of sound.

I think you've confused the word 'we' for 'I/me'. You personally may imagine lines of demarcation, and decide what kind of music certain artists are creating, and/or know other people that think like that. You don't speak for the majority though, and I'm sure artists don't appreciate being put into boxes either. And what if someone who does 'ragga' writes a 'filth' tune - then what box do they go in? Utterly futile.