Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 2:52 am
I use AKG K141. I've used them for years. Great sound and seem to last forever.
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
I have these, and while their sound quality is good enough for writing, I wouldn't mix down in them. Hardly any bass comes through.Soi wrote:these sennheiser's HD280
Foamo wrote:For late night production head phones are ok but not for mixing.Buy yourself a pair of Tannoy Reveals preferably the passive model link this up to a good power amp (Samson will do) and you will be fine ,You do not need to worry about going down to 20 hz because your basslines do not need to be that low and most club soundsystems do not reproduce that low anyway.
cheers for the reply, great to get sum advice of the 'master' hehe
ill def look into the reveals..
i know you dont need to go all way down to 20hz, but, for example, these tannoys say they go down to 65 Hz, surely you need to monitor below this though?
as for headphones.. i reckon its between the sennheiser hd580 and akg k240s
AgreedLet me add that every single time I've attempted to mix late night on 'phones, I've always utterly ballsed it up. Every single bloody time. The temptation to make it sound 'exciting' on 'phones always ends up with fatigue and hyped levels that sound like shite the morning after.
I've come to this same compromise - Mix during the day on my monitors, but only ever put things together, sequence, produce, compose on the headphones.
Another good thing I've been doing is summing my master buss into mono and using just ONE monitor to mix with. This sounds crazy, but you CAN pan around in Mono and find the sweet spot for your elements. A trick I learnt from some clever blokes sat behind the big desks. It's easy to concentrate your balance on one speaker, then back over to stereo for finesse and stereo tweakage. Plus, if you get it sounding good on one speaker, in two it'll really sing.
Also, I keep the levels down most of the time. I rarely go above 9 'o clock on the amp when mixing. It's easier to 'feel' the texture of the track and listen for holes. I only whack the volume every now and again to feel the thing and see if it's working. Tracks mixed at low volumes work at all volumes. Tracks mixed loud are often a bit hyped and have difficulty translating to other systems.
I'm mixing on Dynaudio BM6As during sociable hours and using K240s for late night antics - Seems like a good compromise.
It all depends on the bassline and the tune,I think it is important to concentrate on what the tune sounds like first and then worry about the sonics .I do not want to encourage people to mix using spectrum analysers.i'll consider myself corrected! but how low should you go? i had always thought lots of weight between 20 and 40hz was a good thing.
also, how come ppl reccomend against active monitors?
Nohey j so if we cut 20-25 or 30 or whatever will we get more bass
weight
no but you'll get more headroomParson wrote:hey j so if we cut 20-25 or 30 or whatever will we get more bass weight
yeah they normally measure LF extension at the -3db or -6db point. so it wouldn't be flat to 65. but like you say that doesnt mean they don't go lower, its just that they get quieter and quieter the further you go below 65hz.Jtransition wrote:The spec on the Tannoy Reveals does not do these speakes any justice,I think when they are quoting the frequency response of speakers they are talking about accuracy (eg they are accurate down to 65hz ).