Dubstepforum.com

Conic wrote:Unemployment isn't going to go up because Pakis dont work so they are not taking our jobs. They just claim benifits with their 12 kids

snuff wrote:

the acid never lies wrote:Here's an interesting article - tackles the myths about immigration with a knockdown blow when you need to make someone feel foolish

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=20351

its an interesting article not particularly cleverly written, clearly pushing the scoialist agenda as you would expect.

What, from a magazine published by the Socialist Workers' Party?


Jesus wept.

Conic wrote:Unemployment isn't going to go up because Pakis dont work so they are not taking our jobs. They just claim benifits with their 12 kids

Ugh.

You did not get to choose where you were born.

You were randomly assigned.

Stop being a dick.

Conic wrote:Unemployment isn't going to go up because Pakis dont work so they are not taking our jobs. They just claim benifits with their 12 kids

Can anyone else spot the flawed logic in this statement besides the racism?

Yeah, I didn't quite get the point either, despite it being put so eloquently. Spelling the word "benefit" incorrectly I can forgive though, given the intelligence of who spelt it.

gh02 wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:
I know enough British women at home calming benefits with their many kids.

truth...this is the real problem... if you can't pay for them yourself you shouldn't have them in the first place! and if you do, why does that mean you can't work too!? (rant over)

Exactly.

WhosZena? wrote:

gh02 wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:
I know enough British women at home calming benefits with their many kids.

truth...this is the real problem... if you can't pay for them yourself you shouldn't have them in the first place! and if you do, why does that mean you can't work too!? (rant over)

Exactly.

I've moved into the UK recently, and I really noticed very young moms.

I was told they actually get kids on purpose to claim the benefits to buy new louie viton bags, which is sick.

kejk wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:

gh02 wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:
I know enough British women at home calming benefits with their many kids.

truth...this is the real problem... if you can't pay for them yourself you shouldn't have them in the first place! and if you do, why does that mean you can't work too!? (rant over)

Exactly.

I've moved into the UK recently, and I really noticed very young moms.

I was told they actually get kids on purpose to claim the benefits to buy new louie viton bags, which is sick.

You are in Greenock old chap!!!

kejk wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:

gh02 wrote:

WhosZena? wrote:
I know enough British women at home calming benefits with their many kids.

truth...this is the real problem... if you can't pay for them yourself you shouldn't have them in the first place! and if you do, why does that mean you can't work too!? (rant over)

Exactly.

I've moved into the UK recently, and I really noticed very young moms.

I was told they actually get kids on purpose to claim the benefits to buy new louie viton bags, which is sick.

Yeah... that sounds about right.

kejk wrote: I was told they actually get kids on purpose to claim the benefits to buy new louie viton bags, which is sick.

That's largely a myth perpetrated by some taboloids, and like most things if it is repeated enough people will start to accept it as a fact. If you think about it, it is just the right wing media segregating young mothers as a moral example at which the rest of society can point and stare. Futher reinforcing the patriarchal society that we live in. The fact is that most young mums don't get a council house or receive very much in the way of benefits, in fact the vast majority (around 95%) of young mums live with their parents, and the child's grandparents are the main carers - this gives the chance of the young mum to finish her schooling or work.

Overall most mums actually have children later in life, this is of course a side effect of women becoming more empowered in the work place and in society as a whole. Most people also seem to think that teenage mums are on the rise, again this is a myth, teenage pregnancy is on the whole on the decline. Also the way that stats are gathered are inaccurate of how many women actually become mums, conception and pregnancy does not equate being a mum, that is media spin. One thing that si true is that we do have the highest rates of teenage pregancy in europe.

firky wrote:

kejk wrote: I was told they actually get kids on purpose to claim the benefits to buy new louie viton bags, which is sick.

That's largely a myth perpetrated by some taboloids, and like most things if it is repeated enough people will start to accept it as a fact. If you think about it, it is just the right wing media segregating young mothers as a moral example at which the rest of society can point and stare. Futher reinforcing the patriarchal society that we live in. The fact is that most young mums don't get a council house or receive very much in the way of benefits, in fact the vast majority (around 95%) of young mums live with their parents, and the child's grandparents are the main carers - this gives the chance of the young mum to finish her schooling or work.

Overall most mums actually have children later in life, this is of course a side effect of women becoming more empowered in the work place and in society as a whole. Most people also seem to think that teenage mums are on the rise, again this is a myth, teenage pregnancy is on the whole on the decline. Also the way that stats are gathered are inaccurate of how many women actually become mums, conception and pregnancy does not equate being a mum, that is media spin. One thing that si true is that we do have the highest rates of teenage pregancy in europe.

Nice post. I do have to disagree with a few points...

First of all, I've actually met quite a few girls in the club, and when we go to her place it turns out she has a kid (this happened 3 times already, actually out of the 4 girls I've had here, 3 were moms). A friend of me caught some girl making holes in his condoms, so seriously, it's out of control here. About the housing/benefits, I don't really know, I did not research this, but based on personal experience... Only one of them had a job, yet they all had their own place and I met them in the club (which is not free either).

You might be right about their grandparents taking care of them, but still the mum gets the monies.

I do think teenage pregnacy is on the rise, or at least it has been on the rise. There is no way that 30 years back girls were having as much babies in their 14~24s as they do now.

Pregnancy is not the same as being a mom. The thing I tried saying though was that in the UK (Greenock based on my experience) lots of girls TRY to be a mom so they get the benefits.




Inb4 lol typojew, I'm sorry, I'm tired.

haha firky i live underneath these people trust me...

they dont work...have massive tvs that they ensure are visible from the street....are entirely unsuitable parents...screeching constantly yet never that ive seen using actual discipline to stop their kids becoming evil stnuc by the time theyre in their teens...

on my estate the majority of people are always at home bussin r kelly out da windows...

im sure most estates are similar...they are more than happy sponging and not contributing...

they just shouldnt have a kid if they cant afford to pay for it..its that simple...theyre lazy and this is their motivation in working the system

Oh yeah some people do just want to pop a baby out, sit at home smoking cigarettes and watching TV all day. I don't deny that, I have to grit my teeth and work to 'help' some people who are exactly as you describe but overall that is a very small minority of people. Everything I have read with regards to it (I am doing sociology init) paints a very different picture, a quick google brings up this:




Myth: "They only do it to get benefits."
Fact: Pregnant young women under 16 are not entitled to any benefits; 16-18 year-olds get between £33.50 and £44.05 a week. When their baby is born, they get between £102.01 and £112.56 per week. This has to pay for equipment like cots and prams, nappies and clothes, as well as food, bills, and any extra costs like childcare.

However, as with housing, most young mums have little knowledge of social security policy before getting pregnant.

http://www.ywca-england-wales.co.uk/you ... efacts.asp

and

http://teenagemums.org.uk/the-worst-in-europe.php

The Worst in Europe

Many people believe that girls get pregnant so as to get a flat of their own from the Council. In fact 90% of teenage mums live in other people’s homes – normally their parents’.
*

Many believe that the number of teenage pregnancies is rising. In fact the peak was between 1995 and 1997 and there has been a steady, though fairly small fall since 1997.
*

Many believe that British teenagers are just more promiscuous than their European counterparts, which is why we have higher levels of teenage pregnancy. In fact there is little evidence that we are any different in this regard from the rest of Europe.
*

The media often focus on the youngest teenage mums. In fact more than half of teenage pregnancies were to 18 year olds and only 6% to under 16 year olds.
*

Some have suggested that non-Whites are more likely to become teenage mums. In fact 89% of teenage mums are White British and the lowest rates of teenage pregnancy are found amongst Asian women.

Nice actual facts you got there. I guess I judged the "system" too soon.

firky wrote:Many believe that British teenagers are just more promiscuous than their European counterparts, which is why we have higher levels of teenage pregnancy. In fact there is little evidence that we are any different in this regard from the rest of Europe.

Trust me on this one, in 19 years of Amsterdam I've only "picked up" 2 women from the club.

4 months in Greenock and I'm counting 4 already, the vibe is just different here, they are also cool with it if you never even call/see them again.

those are numbers...i only go on my experiences and not hearsay.....on my estate most people dont work...this is clear as they are always here when i have a day off in the week...

not disputing the facts in what youre sayin but this country is fucked....people go out and work increasingly hard given the economic climate and others dont work and sit at home....i have no issue with people on jobseekers as it only lasts 6 months anyway...i take issue with anyone living off the taxpayer even if it a paltry amount they get...they still get it for nothing and are in the situation 9 times out of 10 through willful choice...

i feel like an outsider on my estate as i work and have ethics....

and tbh i always thought it was lazy whites having all the kids....asian culture has the right approach to family values if you ask me...

It's because you have an accent, if you're Geordie down south it's easy to pull, you just have to talk and make them laugh. Always had more results when I lived down south or in London than I ever had up north. If you have an Irish accent, women fight over you

@ pistons, the problem with being on the dole is that you're less likely to get a job because you're on the dole. The longer you're on the dole the less chance you have to get a dole because people assume you don't want to work. The welfare state can actually stagment social mobility. Yet half the reason this country is still fucked is because of Thatcher's legacy, and partly because New Labour have actually increased the gap between the rich and poor (take a look at the gini coefficient) - catch 22.

anyone can change their situation and existence imho

they just need to change their mindset which only they can do

Us minorities are into that spite poverty.

In fact, I AIM to go on both disability (by eating my way there) and welfare just to piss off white devils.

Yeah.