Page 2 of 2
Re: DAWs that aren't ridiculously irritating?
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:07 am
by nowaysj
I've gone on and on about this, so excuse me if I'm brief, but fl has never had the ability to do auto plugin delay compensation. A very big technical issue, that is actually going to be resolved, after the dev told me directly for years that it COULDN'T be implemented.

Re: DAWs that aren't ridiculously irritating?
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:08 am
by DZA
DS10 or gtfo
Re: DAWs that aren't ridiculously irritating?
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:45 am
by tavravlavish
logic, there are a few things that bug me a little bit, but im sure if i new more about the program there are probably options to make these problems go away, the automation can be kinda a bitch sometimes too, but there are ways to make it an unpainful experience. fruity loops is the most frustrating thing ever in my opinion.
Re: DAWs that aren't ridiculously irritating?
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:08 am
by youthful_implants
I am getting pretty fluent in Ableton after having used Cubase for over 10 years. I am learning Ableton so I can take it on the road and do a live set which I cant with Cubase.
Ableton is easy to use, but it still frustrates the shit out of me because I want it to be a quick as Cubase to do certain things.
However there are things I can do more easily in Ableton so its been worth the effort.
I would strongly recommend learning one DAW properly before switching though, as ultimately they all do roughly the same thing so understanding one is key to understanding them all.
Re: DAWs that aren't ridiculously irritating?
Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:07 pm
by MidnightMassDubstep
Echoi wrote:MidnightMassDubstep wrote:did you make the track in your sig? It's satisfying

is that directed to me? if so, yes i did make it, hats sound a bit iffy though on soundcloud, glad you dig
They sound great on soundcloud... the sub sounds so lush and smooth. good job