Dubstepforum.com

redraven wrote:

gnome wrote:

boko91 wrote:REverse Compression

Best kept secret in the buzinezz

That does sound impossible...But I'm sure your going to tell me how

Wouldn't that be an Expander?

REverse compression sure does sound fancy

FSTZ wrote:

redraven wrote:

gnome wrote:

boko91 wrote:REverse Compression

Best kept secret in the buzinezz

That does sound impossible...But I'm sure your going to tell me how

Wouldn't that be an Expander?

REverse compression sure does sound fancy

I for one am intrigued........

he's got to be chatting about expanders or maximisers

from what im gathering off the ol internets its a way of fattening a sound without compressing the initial transients. might have to fuck about with this tonight

JFK wrote:

FSTZ wrote:

redraven wrote:

gnome wrote:

boko91 wrote:REverse Compression

Best kept secret in the buzinezz

That does sound impossible...But I'm sure your going to tell me how

Wouldn't that be an Expander?

REverse compression sure does sound fancy

I for one am intrigued........

its the same as reveres reverb. just reveres your auido then, compress then, reverse it again.

yea so a sucking effect vs a pumping like with sidechaining
messed with it before for some interesting results, just you have to think of your envelope and ratio in a diff way

FSTZ wrote:he's got to be chatting about expanders or maximisers

yes and no, so of the effect can be made the way the other is kinda tricky to explain and already have some booze in me, but lemme have a smoke and think of a good way to explain it

3za wrote: its the same as reveres reverb. just reveres your auido then, compress then, reverse it again.

never once thought of doing that! gonna have to give it a go...

Without consulting the interwebs, I think u lot r crazy. Compressors usually contain attack and release controls. If you want to retain your transients, use a slower attack...? Wut wut?

nowaysj wrote:Without consulting the interwebs, I think u lot r crazy. Compressors usually contain attack and release controls. If you want to retain your transients, use a slower attack...? Wut wut?

i was thinking the same thing at first but......its different. probably wont use it but good to know it exists.

sounds like a lot of mucking around...

this "experimentation" sounds fun but not very practical

nowaysj wrote:Without consulting the interwebs, I think u lot r crazy. Compressors usually contain attack and release controls. If you want to retain your transients, use a slower attack...? Wut wut?

Rule number 1: If all eles fails play it backwards. (and compress it)

i fancy up my productions by wearing an ascot and drinking my pabst with a pinky out.

yoseph wrote:i fancy up my productions by wearing an ascot and drinking my pabst with a pinky out.

i have no idea what your on about man

yoseph wrote:i fancy up my productions by wearing an ascot and drinking my pabst with a pinky out.

nuff sarcastic stnuc on here

thats not sarcasm, thats just funny. Don't get booty hurt for nothin.

For those interested in creative compression:
http://emusician.com/tutorials/emusic_c ... mpression/

daamn can't wait to try reverse compression on drums

Well it's official, reverse compression is a fancy production tip.

Reverse Limiting

seriously though on a site explaining reverse compression, the guy went into "sidechained reverb"?

basically take a source e.g snare send to a reverb bus, then add a compressor after the reverb with the sidechain input coming from the snare (or anything else you want)

you get a really clean/dry sound when the sound is played but then you get the reverb creep up in the tail to fill out the space a bit. Thought it was quite cool