Re: Any point in writing dubstep in 6/8 ?
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 3:09 pm
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=time+signaturesLTUK wrote:Don't suppose anyone could explain time signatures?
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=time+signaturesLTUK wrote:Don't suppose anyone could explain time signatures?
venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
7/4 is very possible. 4/7 is not. You can't give an odd number as the second part of a signature.deadly habit wrote:venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
thisAssassin wrote:7/4 is very possible. 4/7 is not. You can't give an odd number as the second part of a signature.deadly habit wrote:venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
Yeah, but that's not 4/7.deadly habit wrote:venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
That's clarified what I thought. I've had arguments with metalheads that "write" in "4/3" and "7/5", with them trying to tell me insane notes exist.static_cast wrote:Yeah, but that's not 4/7.deadly habit wrote:venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
4/7 = "four seventh notes per bar" --------> "seventh notes" don't exist, neither do 6th notes. Time signatures are all (any number)/(1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32).... but almost always (any number)/(4 or 8 ).
@Assassin: 4/4 and 8/8 have bars of the same length but imply a different feel - in 8/8 you'd count eighth notes, in 4/4 you'd count quarter notes.
I suppose if you wanted to get pedantic about it, most halftime dubstep is actually in 4/2....
metal and alot of live band work has tempo and time signature changes which can be a bitch to emulate or recreate drum tracks for when working in a daw. why i love cubase's tempo track etcAssassin wrote:That's clarified what I thought. I've had arguments with metalheads that "write" in "4/3" and "7/5", with them trying to tell me insane notes exist.static_cast wrote:Yeah, but that's not 4/7.deadly habit wrote:venetian snares writes in 7/4 time to timestatic_cast wrote:Umm, 4/7? Is that even possible?Hurtdeer wrote:i released a couple of tracks that switch from 4/7 to 7/7 on twenty twelve last year. time signatures are fun
4/7 = "four seventh notes per bar" --------> "seventh notes" don't exist, neither do 6th notes. Time signatures are all (any number)/(1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32).... but almost always (any number)/(4 or 8 ).
@Assassin: 4/4 and 8/8 have bars of the same length but imply a different feel - in 8/8 you'd count eighth notes, in 4/4 you'd count quarter notes.
I suppose if you wanted to get pedantic about it, most halftime dubstep is actually in 4/2....
It's just people trying the sound clever.
Disagree, I find it much easier to work out how the two tracks are sitting when there's smaller beat divisions than crotchets... to each their own!sully.harmitage wrote:some practical advise:
if you want your tune to be realistically mixable,
don't use 1/8 notes in the intro, only crotchets.
or write the intro in 4/4.
haha at 4/7. thats straight out of Spinal Tap.
LTUK wrote:Don't suppose anyone could explain time signatures?
So would every 2 bars of the 6/8 tune take the same amount of time as 1 bar of 4/4?ajfa wrote:4/4 at 140bpm will have the same length bar as 6/8 at 105bpm I think...? So if you mix a 4/4 triplet feel tune with a 6/8 105bpm it should work if your mixing is tight.
No. It should take a third less time at 105 meaning the bars would be the same length. But at 140 it should go:green plan wrote:So would every 2 bars of the 6/8 tune take the same amount of time as 1 bar of 4/4?ajfa wrote:4/4 at 140bpm will have the same length bar as 6/8 at 105bpm I think...? So if you mix a 4/4 triplet feel tune with a 6/8 105bpm it should work if your mixing is tight.
1 & a 2 & a 1 & a 2 & a
1 2 3 4
check out nike by moscaAssassin wrote:No. It should take a third less time at 105 meaning the bars would be the same length. But at 140 it should go:green plan wrote:So would every 2 bars of the 6/8 tune take the same amount of time as 1 bar of 4/4?ajfa wrote:4/4 at 140bpm will have the same length bar as 6/8 at 105bpm I think...? So if you mix a 4/4 triplet feel tune with a 6/8 105bpm it should work if your mixing is tight.
1 & a 2 & a 1 & a 2 & a
1 2 3 4
1 & 2 & 3 & 1 &(6/8)
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 &(4/4)
so basically the first beat starts on the four on the first bar. But obviously this would continually change.
So:
1 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 1 & 2 & 3 & (6/8)
1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & (4/4) (I do know this shouldn't be counted as 1/8 notes before someone gets pedantic but it's easier to type.)
So if the snare was put on the third 1/4 note as normal it would land on the third, the second, the first and the fourth before coming back again. Which I guess doesn't make it impossible but it would be a challenge.
However at 105 (6/8) mixing into 140 (4/4) it would be more of a triplet feel. For example:
1 & 2 & 3 &
1& 2& 3& 4&
Therefore it should mix well into a song with a decent triplet feel. But it also means that the third will fall late so it could still be difficult, unless you garage it up a bit.