Re: Alternative Sound Design Techniques
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:19 pm
Thank you 

worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
Wrigzilla wrote:I think I load more EDM artists need to do an Amon Tobin and start sampling "real" sounds and then mangling them. I'm a great fan of recording/sampling "real" sounds and transforming them into more dance orientated sounds.yamaz wrote:A microphone. Want industrial, sample a boiler room. Want ambient, sample the forest. Want weird, sample torture chamber in an alien mothership. Want sexy sample asian lesbian sex slaves. Want filth sample mud.
This thread is an attempt to get people to think outside the massive brootal electro way of doing wobbles/sounds.
that way of doing things is certainly the way that film sound designers often approach their work.Wrigzilla wrote:I think I load more EDM artists need to do an Amon Tobin and start sampling "real" sounds and then mangling them. I'm a great fan of recording/sampling "real" sounds and transforming them into more dance orientated sounds.yamaz wrote:A microphone. Want industrial, sample a boiler room. Want ambient, sample the forest. Want weird, sample torture chamber in an alien mothership. Want sexy sample asian lesbian sex slaves. Want filth sample mud.
Haha. That's sick. My flatmate's got a blown hifi speaker with a pretty hefty bass driver but some nasty rattles when you play pure subs through it. Been meaning to sample it for ages, maybe I will this weekend...alex_l wrote:6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwjO1c8TfhE (I think this actually made it onto the album on 'Leakage')
Now I'm sure THAT one is a joke (although it may yield results...) noisia never mentioned anything like that on their Q&A on DOA.6) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwjO1c8TfhE (I think this actually made it onto the album on 'Leakage')
You can combine these for fun and profit - I've got quite into using a snappy percussive sound with a short delay at 100% feedback to produce a strange rattley oscillator sound, and then sticking a volume envelope and all the usual crap over the top. Then start messing around with the delay time to change pitch and rhythm...Wrigzilla wrote:Feedback:
Send a sound to a bus and send the bus to itself (put a limiter on the bus or the master - YOU CAN BLOW YOUR SPEAKERS BY DOING THIS OR DAMAGE YOUR EARS). The send level to the bus is the feedback level, by adding inserts to the bus you can modify the feedback loop. Try automating the volume, send level and insert effects to create interesting new sounds.
Short Delays:
Create a sound and add a delay plug in as an insert (50% wet) now set the delay time to something less than 30ms. This can create a chorus style effect and if you turn up the feedback this goes more into the territory of phaser/flanger. Try messing about with lfo settings to create more twisted sounds.
I'm afraid I don't know how Reaktor handles feedback (although I'm sure it does it well enough, if I remember correctly the Space Drone ensemble makes some really nice feedback style noises). When I can afford it I'm definitely getting Reaktor, I've been using pD for my more leftfield effects ideas and some things are a lot easier to do in Reaktor.slothrop wrote:You can combine these for fun and profit - I've got quite into using a snappy percussive sound with a short delay at 100% feedback to produce a strange rattley oscillator sound, and then sticking a volume envelope and all the usual crap over the top. Then start messing around with the delay time to change pitch and rhythm...
I like Synthedit for this - IMO stuff on the borderline between sound design and synth design - particularly using feedback effects - is where it really shines. Although I've been starting to use Reaktor lately (got it with Komplete, but just haven't had the time to start digging into it properly yet) - does that handle feedback loops nicely?
Reaktor can do whatever you want it to do. If you need feedback you just hook it up. It's basically just a graphical DSP programming language -- if you know the algorithm, you can make pretty much any effect you want. Most of the NI stuff is prototyped in Reaktor.Wrigzilla wrote:I'm afraid I don't know how Reaktor handles feedback (although I'm sure it does it well enough, if I remember correctly the Space Drone ensemble makes some really nice feedback style noises). When I can afford it I'm definitely getting Reaktor, I've been using pD for my more leftfield effects ideas and some things are a lot easier to do in Reaktor.slothrop wrote:You can combine these for fun and profit - I've got quite into using a snappy percussive sound with a short delay at 100% feedback to produce a strange rattley oscillator sound, and then sticking a volume envelope and all the usual crap over the top. Then start messing around with the delay time to change pitch and rhythm...
I like Synthedit for this - IMO stuff on the borderline between sound design and synth design - particularly using feedback effects - is where it really shines. Although I've been starting to use Reaktor lately (got it with Komplete, but just haven't had the time to start digging into it properly yet) - does that handle feedback loops nicely?
Yeah, I think that's about fair. It certainly feels like its slightly more towards the 'analog modular' end of the analog modular to programming language continuum. I found it marginally more user friendly to start with (and haven't been using Reaktor for long enough to know how it compares in terms of long-term usability) although it also has a bit of the standard high-level language issue that if you want to do something almost but not quite standard it can be a bit of a faff.static_cast wrote:Never used SynthEdit but from what I hear it's like Reaktor but more user-friendly, more CPU intensive and maybe less geared up towards low-level mathy stuff.
I'm doing a degree in Creative Music Technology at Bath Spa. We've studied: recording techniques, sound design for TV/film, digital signal processing (audio theory and how to make effects), production techniques, sonic art (anything from soundscapes to electroacoustic music), multimedia (so stuff like flash games, making videos etc). There are also options for things like game audio, interactive audio and sonic performance.VirtualMark wrote:Wrigzilla - what course is it you're doing? Sounds interesting. I've been looking at courses from point blank and dubspot but i'd need a lot of cash for these. Sounds like the degree route may be better. What sort of things have you been studying?
For sure, there's always a trade off between more control + creative options vs quick workflow. Personally I often go for the quicker workflow route, but it's always good to try different ways of doing things.this is an interesting topic as its always nice to see fresh ideas for experimentation. although i'd think some of them may slow down workflow(i.e i'd rather use a delay plug and flick through presets quickly than do a manual delay) theres definitely some interesting ideas there.
I've never tried it but these articles look good:Does anyone know how to make impulse responses? its not something i've tried, but i like the suggestion of using non ir's in a convolution reverb and want to give it a try.
Well well well, so am IWrigzilla wrote:I'm doing a degree in Creative Music Technology at Bath Spa. We've studied: recording techniques, sound design for TV/film, digital signal processing (audio theory and how to make effects), production techniques, sonic art (anything from soundscapes to electroacoustic music), multimedia (so stuff like flash games, making videos etc). There are also options for things like game audio, interactive audio and sonic performance.VirtualMark wrote:Wrigzilla - what course is it you're doing? Sounds interesting. I've been looking at courses from point blank and dubspot but i'd need a lot of cash for these. Sounds like the degree route may be better. What sort of things have you been studying?