Dubstepforum.com

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:56 pm**

i read 2nd april

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:14 pm**

I dont really feel it.

Am I the only one that thinks the original of this one is better? If there was one track that was completely headbuckingly energetic, and DIDNT need to be half-ed down it was it.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:20 pm**

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:27 pm**

I love 'em both

The contrast between loefah's beat and flowdans vocal is fantastic in the remix, and loefah's vocal edits are sick. The original is just pure energy. Different tunes for different times..

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:32 pm**

ADRUU wrote:I dont really feel it.

Am I the only one that thinks the original of this one is better? If there was one track that was completely headbuckingly energetic, and DIDNT need to be half-ed down it was it.

Definitely agree here, the original is great the way it is. I honestly don't see how any club related remixes can bring anything new to the table with this, particularly not a typical halfstep minimalist-makeover that Loefah has done so many times already.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:41 pm**

UFO over easy wrote:I love 'em both The contrast between loefah's beat and flowdans vocal is fantastic in the remix, and loefah's vocal edits are sick. The original is just pure energy. Different tunes for different times..

at first the remix didn't get me. nor me it. but after hearing it out and loud many times i've grown to love it. exactly how you say ben.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:56 pm**

Sand Leaper wrote:Definitely agree here, the original is great the way it is. I honestly don't see how any club related remixes can bring anything new to the table with this, particularly not a typical halfstep minimalist-makeover that Loefah has done so many times already.

Remix is sick, absolutely goes off at fwd.

Not understanding the criticism on this.

Club related remix what? It aint about any of that mate, it's just how Loefah thinks he can make a good tune even better. That's what a remix is.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:10 pm**

Plasticman wrote:Easily my favourite track at the moment.

Perfect for the person who likes their grimy dubstep!

yea, bad tune went off proper at the fix up on friday

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:15 pm**

DIRTY wrote:hopefully get a release on bleep

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:18 pm**

dunno, caught it on the 1xtra four hour thing and it just didnt grab me like the original did. tis probably a club thing...

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:42 pm**

The first time i heard the Loefah mix loud i knew it was a killer.

Nice to have 2 different styles on one 12

Looking forward to getting it on my own turntables

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:46 pm**

Tune is big out, sounds fucking jank on my PC though just like every other Loefah tune

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:00 pm**

Digital wrote: Club related remix what? It aint about any of that mate, it's just how Loefah thinks he can make a good tune even better. That's what a remix is.

By "club related" I mean remixes that are meant for the dance, as I think there is little to no potential left for a remix catering to the dance when the original is as good as it is (I remember the original got three rewinds on Kode9's FWD podcast last year).

Obviously, I disagree with Loefah on this kind of makeover making the tune better. And, just in case: the first time I ever heard this was at Warrior Dubz last year, didn't like it then either.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:09 pm**

I know what you meant.

So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed? Ha. Isn't the majority of dubstep catered for the dance?

Heavy remixes of already shower tunes:
Rutten
Third Choice
Request Line
Avenger
Splurt
Punisher...to name a few.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:14 pm**

Digital wrote:I know what you meant.

So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed? Ha. Isn't the majority of dubstep catered for the dance?

Heavy remixes of already shower tunes:
Rutten
Third Choice
Request Line
Avenger
Splurt
Punisher...to name a few.

youve got a difference of opinion, let it go man, people are allowed to like different stuff

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:38 pm**

Digital wrote: So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed?

Yeah, that was exactly what I meant.

I was merely making a reminiscing remark similar to your "This remix is sick, it goes off at FWD"-remark.

And so what if the majority of dubstep is catering to the dance? That should just be all the more incentive for producers to take a completely different approach if you ask me.

Posted: **Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:12 pm**

Sand Leaper wrote:
Digital wrote: So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed?
Yeah, that was exactly what I meant. I was merely making a reminiscing remark similar to your "This remix is sick, it goes off at FWD"-remark.

And so what if the majority of dubstep is catering to the dance? That should just be all the more incentive for producers to take a completely different approach if you ask me.

Yeah ok then, nice one.

Posted: **Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:36 am**

Brap! I like this

Posted: **Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:37 am**

Heavy, where can I get it!

Posted: **Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:19 pm**

Think its played on the Forward @ The End snippet on YouTube.

Dubstepforum.com

Jah War- The Bug feat. Flowdan (Loefah remix)