Page 2 of 2
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:20 pm
by paradigm_x
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:45 pm
by sackley
Nice, will try it out later.
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:42 am
by kaiori breathe
Pussy...
Real men produce through the crackle!
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:48 am
by Ldizzy
resampling could help u too.. couldnt it?
i have a friend who's able to make beats with fl while its clipping like hell... and kinda devellopped an ear that could compensate that shitty aspect of computer music... i swear he draws waveforms in his mind
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:50 am
by Ldizzy
kaiori breathe wrote:Pussy...
Real men produce through the crackle!
HAHA
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:07 pm
by symmetricalsounds
kaiori breathe wrote:Pussy...
Real men produce through the crackle!
and the glitches, had plenty of that since my dual core laptop died and i'm relegated to my gf's single core 1gig machine. hard times

Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:17 pm
by zuta
This gonna hurt but
Options > audio settings > sample rate 22050

Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:28 pm
by symmetricalsounds
zuta wrote:This gonna hurt but
Options > audio settings > sample rate 22050

personally i would never put the sample rate that low.
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:30 pm
by zuta
is the last resort ...
and my FL projects don't sound that bad in 22.050
So i guess is just another option
Re: Acceptable setup question
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:54 pm
by symmetricalsounds
zuta wrote:is the last resort ...
and my FL projects don't sound that bad in 22.050
So i guess is just another option
so you've exhausted options like bouncing everything down, and combining says all the drums into one track so takes up less resources?