Page 2 of 2

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:20 pm
by paradigm_x

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:45 pm
by sackley
Nice, will try it out later.

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:42 am
by kaiori breathe
Pussy...

Real men produce through the crackle!

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:48 am
by Ldizzy
resampling could help u too.. couldnt it?

i have a friend who's able to make beats with fl while its clipping like hell... and kinda devellopped an ear that could compensate that shitty aspect of computer music... i swear he draws waveforms in his mind

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:50 am
by Ldizzy
kaiori breathe wrote:Pussy...

Real men produce through the crackle!

HAHA

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:07 pm
by symmetricalsounds
kaiori breathe wrote:Pussy...

Real men produce through the crackle!
and the glitches, had plenty of that since my dual core laptop died and i'm relegated to my gf's single core 1gig machine. hard times :u:

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:17 pm
by zuta
This gonna hurt but

Options > audio settings > sample rate 22050 :t:

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:28 pm
by symmetricalsounds
zuta wrote:This gonna hurt but

Options > audio settings > sample rate 22050 :t:
personally i would never put the sample rate that low.

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:30 pm
by zuta
is the last resort ...
and my FL projects don't sound that bad in 22.050
So i guess is just another option

Re: Acceptable setup question

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:54 pm
by symmetricalsounds
zuta wrote:is the last resort ...
and my FL projects don't sound that bad in 22.050
So i guess is just another option
so you've exhausted options like bouncing everything down, and combining says all the drums into one track so takes up less resources?