Page 2 of 6

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:39 am
by AntlionUK
maybe it was all trollin' in the first place?

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:35 am
by TRNSPLNT
Dark Reign wrote:The Jakwob remix is even worse though, In fact hes just as bad as Mt Eden all together just without as many YouTube hits
this. I cant explain how shocked and annoyed i was when i saw fucking jakwob on a whp line up.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:42 am
by Rekah
jezza2212 wrote:i think there could be many reasons why they were taken off.
but to their gloating. it is very funny
i remember one of them saying "you are just jealous becasue you want to see your face spinning round and round" or something like that

TRNSPLNT wrote:
Dark Reign wrote:The Jakwob remix is even worse though, In fact hes just as bad as Mt Eden all together just without as many YouTube hits
this. I cant explain how shocked and annoyed i was when i saw fucking jakwob on a whp line up.
speaking of the whp i remember seeing hat man there last year, he was still a tnuc then

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:40 am
by brokedjs
Meh, feel for Mt Eden a bit as BBK ultimatly has been quite a big label over the years (more so in dnb) so securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
As much as I dont rate their production at the end of the day they are producers trying to do there thing in a heavily critical and flash in the pan scene (in terms of styles).

I say roll with the punches and endever to push your skills to the next level, got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:10 am
by Basic A
brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Well whats getting dropped by them say?

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:27 am
by brokedjs
Basic A wrote:
brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Well whats getting dropped by them say?
It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.

Its not like Adam F & Fresh didnt even hear the remix and decided to include it in the release, they obviously liked something about it, but due to places such as DSF etc they pulled it as there is alot of negativity surrounding the name Mt. Eden. (This is all conjecture, I dont know the actual reason for the pull but this seems the most obvious)

Like I said before, granted their production might not be up to scratch or whatever, but they are a name which is recognised and they are striving to produce music. For which I have respect for whether I like their tunes/production/style or not.
Wholeheartedly feel a bit sorry for them, considering they are trying to achieve their goals and ambitions and reach negativity on every front, gotta get boring after a while. Hopefully they will take a positive out of it and strive to be better.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:44 am
by NilsFG
AntlionUK wrote:maybe it was all trollin' in the first place?
When I saw Mt. Eden disappear from the release I thought Chemical Records was just trolling us

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:02 pm
by Pistonsbeneath
brokedjs wrote:
Basic A wrote:
brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Well whats getting dropped by them say?
It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.

Its not like Adam F & Fresh didnt even hear the remix and decided to include it in the release, they obviously liked something about it, but due to places such as DSF etc they pulled it as there is alot of negativity surrounding the name Mt. Eden. (This is all conjecture, I dont know the actual reason for the pull but this seems the most obvious)

Like I said before, granted their production might not be up to scratch or whatever, but they are a name which is recognised and they are striving to produce music. For which I have respect for whether I like their tunes/production/style or not.
Wholeheartedly feel a bit sorry for them, considering they are trying to achieve their goals and ambitions and reach negativity on every front, gotta get boring after a while. Hopefully they will take a positive out of it and strive to be better.
they should just make a song maybe????

i would respect that instead of the constant remixing. its a joke

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:06 pm
by brokedjs
Pistonsbeneath wrote:
brokedjs wrote:
Basic A wrote:
brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Well whats getting dropped by them say?
It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.

Its not like Adam F & Fresh didnt even hear the remix and decided to include it in the release, they obviously liked something about it, but due to places such as DSF etc they pulled it as there is alot of negativity surrounding the name Mt. Eden. (This is all conjecture, I dont know the actual reason for the pull but this seems the most obvious)

Like I said before, granted their production might not be up to scratch or whatever, but they are a name which is recognised and they are striving to produce music. For which I have respect for whether I like their tunes/production/style or not.
Wholeheartedly feel a bit sorry for them, considering they are trying to achieve their goals and ambitions and reach negativity on every front, gotta get boring after a while. Hopefully they will take a positive out of it and strive to be better.
they should just make a song maybe????



i would respect that instead of the constant remixing. its a joke
Yea maybe your right

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:09 pm
by ashley
After getting a 1/10 or whatever it was for their dead prez remix, releasing Mt Eden straight after isn't going to do them any favours lololol

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:11 pm
by symmetricalsounds
brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?
Pistonsbeneath wrote: they should just make a song maybe????

i would respect that instead of the constant remixing. its a joke
:z:


i reckon they probably got signed up because of the amount of youtube hits and when they actually listened to their tracks and saw the rep in the scene they got dropped.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:13 pm
by brokedjs
symmetricalsounds wrote:
brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?
Yes of course they do

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:14 pm
by jam1
Excellent troll from Chemical... :lol:

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:15 pm
by Pistonsbeneath
ashley wrote:After getting a 1/10 or whatever it was for their dead prez remix, releasing Mt Eden straight after isn't going to do them any favours lololol
where was this?

and i dont see how anything so far makes them any more producers than me making a mashup in ableton

i am making my own tunes now but in 2006 i wasnt dubstep wise and wouldnt have dared call my ableton combinations my own productions even though sometimes things were edited a lot

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:21 pm
by hasezwei
maybe it's time for a name change.

oh and now that i think of it, it's not mt eden i hate, it's their fans. the fact that they're so protective with their "y'all haters!!11"-attitude.
there's nothing bad about making shit tunes right? poor mt eden :cry:

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:30 pm
by ashley
Pistonsbeneath wrote:
ashley wrote:After getting a 1/10 or whatever it was for their dead prez remix, releasing Mt Eden straight after isn't going to do them any favours lololol
where was this?

and i dont see how anything so far makes them any more producers than me making a mashup in ableton

i am making my own tunes now but in 2006 i wasnt dubstep wise and wouldnt have dared call my ableton combinations my own productions even though sometimes things were edited a lot
Mixmag or DJ mag

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:43 pm
by symmetricalsounds
brokedjs wrote:
symmetricalsounds wrote:
brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?
Yes of course they do
yeah but they're not really producing their own content, just rehashing other peoples stuff.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:45 pm
by kingldub
Kinda gutted for them to be honest. It's not exactly their fault that they have found popularity amongst aggravated teens.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:52 pm
by joeki
kingldub wrote:Kinda gutted for them to be honest. It's not exactly their fault that they have found popularity amongst aggravated teens.
they should have thought of that before stealing other peoples tunes and mixing them down.

Good riddance, and yeah I already didn'th old Fresh in high regard and whole this episode has not improved that.

Re: Mt eden removed from record??

Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:58 pm
by brokedjs
symmetricalsounds wrote:
brokedjs wrote:
symmetricalsounds wrote:
brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?
Yes of course they do
yeah but they're not really producing their own content, just rehashing other peoples stuff.
Creating remixes doesnt write you off as a producer, allows you to create your own interpretation, that being said none of us know to what extent they create these remixes. If its in a sorta "Mash up" style then I would tend to agree with you that it is a rehash, however who knows.

Is pretty circular really, just hope they can learn from their experience in the scene so far and turn any negativity into a positive tool in the studio. They have the popularity (all be it to a seggregated part of the dubstep scene), thats the hard part, they now just need to deliver.
Dont forget they are not aiming tunes are you or me or DSF, there audience is different and they know that, and if that audience enjoy it then they are winning.

Is a shame really, if they put out a really great original track it will get shunned still, such a stigma attached to the name, I think it will be difficult to make waves.

Im certainly interested to see where they are a few years down the line though