Re: Mt eden removed from record??
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:39 am
maybe it was all trollin' in the first place?
worldwide dubstep community
https://www.dubstepforum.com/forum/
this. I cant explain how shocked and annoyed i was when i saw fucking jakwob on a whp line up.Dark Reign wrote:The Jakwob remix is even worse though, In fact hes just as bad as Mt Eden all together just without as many YouTube hits
jezza2212 wrote:i think there could be many reasons why they were taken off.
but to their gloating. it is very funny
i remember one of them saying "you are just jealous becasue you want to see your face spinning round and round" or something like that
speaking of the whp i remember seeing hat man there last year, he was still a tnuc thenTRNSPLNT wrote:this. I cant explain how shocked and annoyed i was when i saw fucking jakwob on a whp line up.Dark Reign wrote:The Jakwob remix is even worse though, In fact hes just as bad as Mt Eden all together just without as many YouTube hits
Well whats getting dropped by them say?brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.Basic A wrote:Well whats getting dropped by them say?brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
When I saw Mt. Eden disappear from the release I thought Chemical Records was just trolling usAntlionUK wrote:maybe it was all trollin' in the first place?
they should just make a song maybe????brokedjs wrote:It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.Basic A wrote:Well whats getting dropped by them say?brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Its not like Adam F & Fresh didnt even hear the remix and decided to include it in the release, they obviously liked something about it, but due to places such as DSF etc they pulled it as there is alot of negativity surrounding the name Mt. Eden. (This is all conjecture, I dont know the actual reason for the pull but this seems the most obvious)
Like I said before, granted their production might not be up to scratch or whatever, but they are a name which is recognised and they are striving to produce music. For which I have respect for whether I like their tunes/production/style or not.
Wholeheartedly feel a bit sorry for them, considering they are trying to achieve their goals and ambitions and reach negativity on every front, gotta get boring after a while. Hopefully they will take a positive out of it and strive to be better.
Yea maybe your rightPistonsbeneath wrote:they should just make a song maybe????brokedjs wrote:It probably says that they are really fucking gutted.Basic A wrote:Well whats getting dropped by them say?brokedjs wrote:securing a release with them has got to be a real boost.
Its not like Adam F & Fresh didnt even hear the remix and decided to include it in the release, they obviously liked something about it, but due to places such as DSF etc they pulled it as there is alot of negativity surrounding the name Mt. Eden. (This is all conjecture, I dont know the actual reason for the pull but this seems the most obvious)
Like I said before, granted their production might not be up to scratch or whatever, but they are a name which is recognised and they are striving to produce music. For which I have respect for whether I like their tunes/production/style or not.
Wholeheartedly feel a bit sorry for them, considering they are trying to achieve their goals and ambitions and reach negativity on every front, gotta get boring after a while. Hopefully they will take a positive out of it and strive to be better.
i would respect that instead of the constant remixing. its a joke
but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
Pistonsbeneath wrote: they should just make a song maybe????
i would respect that instead of the constant remixing. its a joke
Yes of course they dosymmetricalsounds wrote:but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
where was this?ashley wrote:After getting a 1/10 or whatever it was for their dead prez remix, releasing Mt Eden straight after isn't going to do them any favours lololol
Mixmag or DJ magPistonsbeneath wrote:where was this?ashley wrote:After getting a 1/10 or whatever it was for their dead prez remix, releasing Mt Eden straight after isn't going to do them any favours lololol
and i dont see how anything so far makes them any more producers than me making a mashup in ableton
i am making my own tunes now but in 2006 i wasnt dubstep wise and wouldnt have dared call my ableton combinations my own productions even though sometimes things were edited a lot
yeah but they're not really producing their own content, just rehashing other peoples stuff.brokedjs wrote:Yes of course they dosymmetricalsounds wrote:but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style
they should have thought of that before stealing other peoples tunes and mixing them down.kingldub wrote:Kinda gutted for them to be honest. It's not exactly their fault that they have found popularity amongst aggravated teens.
Creating remixes doesnt write you off as a producer, allows you to create your own interpretation, that being said none of us know to what extent they create these remixes. If its in a sorta "Mash up" style then I would tend to agree with you that it is a rehash, however who knows.symmetricalsounds wrote:yeah but they're not really producing their own content, just rehashing other peoples stuff.brokedjs wrote:Yes of course they dosymmetricalsounds wrote:but do they really count as producers til they make their own tunes?brokedjs wrote: got enough respect for ANY producer no matter their ability or style