Dubstepforum.com

Swissdub wrote:its just the pose they are chucing, youll notice in that little gif thing the face dosent change from emma's its just the grey hair and backround.

look closely at the face features...e.g nose eyes mouth eyebrows they all stay as emma's


almost ruined this thread with that gif thing

it does change, it's just subtle because it doesn't remain at either extreme for a particularly long time

Swissdub wrote:its just the pose they are chucing, youll notice in that little gif thing the face dosent change from emma's its just the grey hair and backround.

look closely at the face features...e.g nose eyes mouth eyebrows they all stay as emma's


almost ruined this thread with that gif thing

eyebrows, lips, wrinkles around the eyes... it all changes.
your just missing out on how similar their features are!!

!!chea

I'd honestly bang both of them, so none of this really matters...

She falls into the category of "Would-be-fit-if-she-had-tits"


See also; Kiera Knightley, Lily Allen

AllNightDayDream wrote:

wub wrote:She falls into the category of "Would-be-fit-if-she-had-tits"


See also; Kiera Knightley, Lily Allen

i don't understand this

i mean, i don't find emma watson super gorgeous in the first place, but would you really disregard someone has hot as kiera knightley just cause she's a bit flat? I've always felt that shape of the tits is far more important than anything else, and small tits are more nicely shaped. Large breasts are often flabby and shapeless blobs. and don't even get me started on lopsided boobs...

Phigure wrote: I've always felt that shape of the tits is far more important than anything else, and small tits are more nicely shaped. Large breasts are often flabby and shapeless blobs. and don't even get me started on lopsided boobs...

bottle feed??? I feel sorry for ya son,
but alas... each to their own!

I have double handfulls with my miss. LOVELY FAT BOOBIES!!

!!chea

Sirius wrote:

Phigure wrote: I've always felt that shape of the tits is far more important than anything else, and small tits are more nicely shaped. Large breasts are often flabby and shapeless blobs. and don't even get me started on lopsided boobs...

bottle feed??? I feel sorry for ya son,
but alas... each to their own!

I have double handfulls with my miss. LOVELY FAT BOOBIES!!

!!chea

agreed, it's personal preference, but i don't think it's really that important. i mean, to be honest, what do you really do with them?

Phigure wrote:

wub wrote:She falls into the category of "Would-be-fit-if-she-had-tits"


See also; Kiera Knightley, Lily Allen

i don't understand this

i mean, i don't find emma watson super gorgeous in the first place, but would you really disregard someone has hot as kiera knightley just cause she's a bit flat? .

Personaly preference. I'm not saying that Emma Watson or Kiera Knightley aren't fit, it's just that I like boobs. A good handful, just short of something you could knock yourself unconcious with.

Phigure wrote:

Sirius wrote:

Phigure wrote: I've always felt that shape of the tits is far more important than anything else, and small tits are more nicely shaped. Large breasts are often flabby and shapeless blobs. and don't even get me started on lopsided boobs...

bottle feed??? I feel sorry for ya son,
but alas... each to their own!

I have double handfulls with my miss. LOVELY FAT BOOBIES!!

!!chea

agreed, it's personal preference, but i don't think it's really that important. i mean, to be honest, what do you really do with them?

A wahine with good cleavage is meke as!

ya suckle em, rub em, fuck em, put ya head between & raspberry em!

ya put ya head on em & go to sleep.

shit... big boobies = world peace!!

!!chea

!!titschea

nice under-arms & inner thighs

Pistonsbeneath wrote:

back to the matter at hand though. emma watson is fit, small boobs or not...

hahahaahahhhahhahhahaahahahhahhaahhahah

shit made me crack up hardout!

!!chea

Ah, maaan that's disturbing!

you guys can see its just the light right?

shes the most perteyest girl

Phigure wrote:

wub wrote:She falls into the category of "Would-be-fit-if-she-had-tits"


See also; Kiera Knightley, Lily Allen

i don't understand this

i mean, i don't find emma watson super gorgeous in the first place, but would you really disregard someone has hot as kiera knightley just cause she's a bit flat? I've always felt that shape of the tits is far more important than anything else, and small tits are more nicely shaped. Large breasts are often flabby and shapeless blobs. and don't even get me started on lopsided boobs...

Preach, brother, preach.