Dubstepforum.com

That's some wild shit, dawg.

hackman wrote: yeah goddamnit i wish that ball of light was just a tiny bit more defined
then i might be able to accept it's presence!

why are you having trouble accepting its presence? it's obviously there dude. is something wrong with your vision? i figured it was fairly obvious, even if it is fake... are you having screen problems? im pretty sure the ball of light is there in the video for the rest of us, maybe you should watch it again, full screen this time, you'll definitely see it

Star of wonder
Star of might
Star with burning beauty bright
Westwood leading
Still proceeding
Guide us to our perfect light


..Hands up they were on a UFO flex

knell wrote:

hackman wrote: yeah goddamnit i wish that ball of light was just a tiny bit more defined
then i might be able to accept it's presence!

why are you having trouble accepting its presence? it's obviously there dude. is something wrong with your vision? i figured it was fairly obvious, even if it is fake... are you having screen problems? im pretty sure the ball of light is there in the video for the rest of us, maybe you should watch it again, full screen this time, you'll definitely see it

i can't tell if you missed his sarcasm or are countering with your own

Hackman

fractal wrote:

knell wrote:

hackman wrote: yeah goddamnit i wish that ball of light was just a tiny bit more defined
then i might be able to accept it's presence!

why are you having trouble accepting its presence? it's obviously there dude. is something wrong with your vision? i figured it was fairly obvious, even if it is fake... are you having screen problems? im pretty sure the ball of light is there in the video for the rest of us, maybe you should watch it again, full screen this time, you'll definitely see it

i can't tell if you missed his sarcasm or are countering with your own

Me either, so confused.

they are both being sarcastic lol. because hackman missed the original point .

wtf hackmans back again?

i think he had a month ban, ending today apparantly

fair nuff

also this alien thing looks bare believable, also isnt obama meant to announce some statement about aliens soon

yeah and then in the 2012 olympics there will be a huge emergence, and all earth will unite under the NWO.
lol its straight outta Watchmen.

hahahaha shush

very fake

this vid shows how it's just a composite with edited sound and cgi

This is a stabilized version of the Temple Mount UFO video. The brightness and contrast have also been increased. This video highlights a major flaw of perspective, and proves it is fake.

Everyone should know that objects further away from the camera move more slowly than objects closer to the camera. That is called PARALLAX.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax

However, in this video, the city lights move faster than the man, wall, and tree which is closer to the camera. That is impossible. Also, the city lights move independently from the camera movement, that is not possible either. The city lights should be locked to the camera movement, and the man, wall, and tree should only be moving.

Hold your hand steady in front of your computer screen, close one eye, and move your head around... you will see the computer screen appears stationary while your hand moves around. That is how the city lights should move.

This video shows signs of being a composite.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compositing

Either a type of "green screen" or a "mask" was used to insert the city lights of Jerusalem into the scene. The man, the wall, and the tree were filmed first. Whoever made this video cut out the area around the man, above the wall, and next to the tree, and then inserted the city lights behind it.

You can get a good view of the "mask" or area that was cut out when you see the fake flash of light. When they created the fake light flash, they only increased the contrast of the city lights but not the rest of the scene (except for the edges of the man which is caused by blending the mask). You can see a good image here:

http://img692.imageshack.us/i/hoaxfak...

Also, light should not have reached the back right side of the man's jacket, that is impossible if the light is coming from the front. Also, if you look close at the image above you will see a dark shadow line along the right edge of the jacket too, that is impossible if the jacket is illuminated as well.

The lights are fake... there is no point source. It's just a magical increase in brightness on top of the scene.

The video of the UFO is CGI, and is a HOAX.

-edit for clarity-

Draw a horizontal line across the horizon of the city lights. Now draw a horizontal line across the top of the brick wall. These two lines should stay perfectly parallel to each other no matter what movement occurs. However, in the video you can see the two lines are constantly changing! This is only possible if they are on a boat on water! The horizon is completely FAKE.

It's a HOAX.

apmje wrote:

fractal wrote:

knell wrote:

hackman wrote: yeah goddamnit i wish that ball of light was just a tiny bit more defined
then i might be able to accept it's presence!

why are you having trouble accepting its presence? it's obviously there dude. is something wrong with your vision? i figured it was fairly obvious, even if it is fake... are you having screen problems? im pretty sure the ball of light is there in the video for the rest of us, maybe you should watch it again, full screen this time, you'll definitely see it

i don't know, i'm just insanely pedantic about shit like that
i need to see shit in hd to believe it's there
as a child i couldn't acknowledge the presence of my kid sister until hd was developed, some ten years, can you believe that?!?

but what about the vid with the people exclaiming?

why does everyone rush to prove something is wrong or fake?

Cant we just be left in our false sense of reality for a little bit longer. Would have been nice to think it was real for a change

fractal wrote:but what about the vid with the people exclaiming?

the 2nd video



is just this picture with them wobbling the camera around and adding on the sound and cgi after!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... t_7088.JPG

check how the flare from the house lights doesn't change at all lol
once you see how they did it you laugh at how fake it looks ))))

jugo wrote:

fractal wrote:but what about the vid with the people exclaiming?

the 2nd video



is just this picture with them wobbling the camera around and adding on the sound and cgi after!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... t_7088.JPG

check how the flare from the house lights doesn't change at all lol
once you see how they did it you laugh at how fake it looks ))))

God damnit! It does look super fake if you look at how the lights off the houses move. Oh well.

anyway, the phoenix lights isn't fake.