Re: Vinyl Pressing
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:52 pm
droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
i got one of my tracks donedroogie wrote:What are people getting cut here,personal tracks or WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax?Just curious
hendramarshall wrote:droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
What a weird position, but I have to ask since your mixes below suggest you are on vinyl only: do you have them, did you purchase them back then, and if so do you drop them at all in your mixes on CD?grillis wrote:hendramarshall wrote:droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
what are people thoughts on cutting tracks that have previously been available on vinyl but have the wav (those dmz that went for sale a few years ago for example?) personally i wouldn't feel too comfortable cutting my own version of a release
Yeh seems to come down to how you personally feel about the matter- I would certainly prefer a legitimate copy of 003 to one I've cutIntended Malice wrote:What a weird position, but I have to ask since your mixes below suggest you are on vinyl only: do you have them, did you purchase them back then, and if so do you drop them at all in your mixes on CD?grillis wrote:hendramarshall wrote:droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
what are people thoughts on cutting tracks that have previously been available on vinyl but have the wav (those dmz that went for sale a few years ago for example?) personally i wouldn't feel too comfortable cutting my own version of a release
I recently found mine in 320 on an old HDD and had I not been so shortsighted (I wasn't into vinyl at all back then) and bought them in an inferior bit rate I'd be tempted to cut Mud and Twist up VIP on vinyl. I don't see the problem myself.
Now, if you decide to mass market them and inflate the current supply in order to profit from it then I could understand the stigma associated to it--and even then I don't think anyone but Mala, Coki or Loefah could really have any valid criticisms. (And I use the word loosely as they Marketed their product in this format with all the known pros/cons associated with it.)
hendra cut lurka's prophet vip. iirc, he posted this a while back and lurka himself was pretty excited that someone (especially from here in the states!) would bother getting a digital release cut to wax.grillis wrote:hendramarshall wrote:droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
what are people thoughts on cutting tracks that have previously been available on vinyl but have the wav (those dmz that went for sale a few years ago for example?) personally i wouldn't feel too comfortable cutting my own version of a release
yeh man I was heavily disappointed when that release didn't make it to vinyl and had considered getting it cut as well- My mate called dibs though.. I got an icicle and silkie tune done insteadskitz_0 wrote:hendra cut lurka's prophet vip. iirc, he posted this a while back and lurka himself was pretty excited that someone (especially from here in the states!) would bother getting a digital release cut to wax.grillis wrote:hendramarshall wrote:droogie wrote:WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax
what are people thoughts on cutting tracks that have previously been available on vinyl but have the wav (those dmz that went for sale a few years ago for example?) personally i wouldn't feel too comfortable cutting my own version of a release
I cut music I get sent, and off friends and my own tunes of course. As Thinking says, Both plastic dubs and acetates have their pros and cons, but I've always preferred acetate.droogie wrote:What are people getting cut here,personal tracks or WAV's they legally purchased but now want on wax?Just curious
eh? so you think a small scale label shouldn't be pissed if someone bootlegs their releases?Now, if you decide to mass market them and inflate the current supply in order to profit from it then I could understand the stigma associated to it--and even then I don't think anyone but Mala, Coki or Loefah could really have any valid criticisms. (And I use the word loosely as they Marketed their product in this format with all the known pros/cons associated with it.)
Intended Malice
Posts: 651
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:21 am
he didnt say selling them... what he said was if he got a digi copy but missed the vinyl release then he might consider cutting the digi version to vinyl for personal usephishu wrote:eh? so you think a small scale label shouldn't be pissed if someone bootlegs their releases?Now, if you decide to mass market them and inflate the current supply in order to profit from it then I could understand the stigma associated to it--and even then I don't think anyone but Mala, Coki or Loefah could really have any valid criticisms. (And I use the word loosely as they Marketed their product in this format with all the known pros/cons associated with it.)
Intended Malice
Posts: 651
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:21 am
repackaging someone's work and selling it for profit, without a licensing agreement, is a pretty dickish thing to do, shows zero respect.